Dodge Journey Dodge Journey forum for discussion on the popular Dodge Crossover and CUV.

Why is the Journey Tow Capacity lower than a Grand Caravan?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 13, 2017 | 11:05 AM
  #1  
Steven Cooper's Avatar
Steven Cooper
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Default Why is the Journey Tow Capacity lower than a Grand Caravan?

Can anyone explain why the 2017 Dodge Journey Crossroads Tow Capacity is lower than the Grand Caravan when both have the same 3.6L V6 engine and VVT transmission? 3,600 to 2,500 is a huge drop if only based on base curb weight or wheel base.
 
Attached Thumbnails Why is the Journey Tow Capacity lower than a Grand Caravan?-screenshot_20170811-183132.png  

Last edited by Steven Cooper; Aug 13, 2017 at 01:00 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2017 | 05:33 PM
  #2  
jkeaton's Avatar
jkeaton
DF Admin
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 28,211
Likes: 366
From: Winston Salem, NC
Default

Completely different platform.
 
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2017 | 06:49 PM
  #3  
primem's Avatar
primem
Record Breaker
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,815
Likes: 56
From: Alberta
Default

yep, gotta consider gvwr.
...and awd would lower the towing capacity due to the added weight and the rear drive unit is pretty small.
 
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2017 | 09:27 PM
  #4  
Steven Cooper's Avatar
Steven Cooper
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Default The numbers don't add up!

Dodge installed tires rated for 1,709 lbs. on the Journey. Both vehicles seat 7 passengers. I understand tongue weight is normally based on 10% of the load being towed. Dodge has given the Journey a meer 2,500 lbs towing capacity.
If I load 7 passengers in my Journey, I have put more weight on the rear axle than the 250 lbs of maximum tongue weight Dodge gives the Journey for towing.
My Journey is156 lbs lighter than the Grand Caravan. Has less surface area which creates less drag. Has the exact same engine and transmission right down to the final drive axle ratio of 3.16. The power to weight ratio should be in the Journeys favor for towing heavier loads. Did Dodge use steel and or fasteners with lower shear and deflection strengths in the chassis of the Journey?
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2017 | 07:14 AM
  #5  
jkeaton's Avatar
jkeaton
DF Admin
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 28,211
Likes: 366
From: Winston Salem, NC
Default

Quite possibly yes. Probably need to pose these questions to the design engineers to get the answers you want.
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2017 | 08:45 AM
  #6  
Steven Cooper's Avatar
Steven Cooper
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Default Does Dodge offer input from design engineers for questions like mine

Chassis design seems to be the only possible variable to explain the low tow capacity on the Journey compared to the Grand Caravan. That seems unlikely though considering Dodge categorizes both the Journey and Grand Caravan as 7 passenger vehicles. You could take towing completely out of the equation and design engineers would have to provide the same platform design aspects to support the same passenger capacity. How do I get an answer from an official Dodge engineer if not through the Dodge forum?
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2017 | 09:06 AM
  #7  
primem's Avatar
primem
Record Breaker
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,815
Likes: 56
From: Alberta
Default

engineers don't have time to answer dealer tech questions let alone a forum that is not associated with fca other than the title.

maybe you should google factors that go into calculating towing capacity.


the twist beam rear axle designof the caravan is stronger than irs of the journey.
 

Last edited by primem; Aug 14, 2017 at 09:11 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2017 | 10:29 AM
  #8  
Steven Cooper's Avatar
Steven Cooper
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Default The rear axle twist beam doesnt provide the answer

The rear axle twist beam compensates for axle deflection relative to weight distribution or uneven surfaces. As I mentioned previously, I would have more weight on the rear axle with 7 passengers than I would have with me and the 350 lb tongue weight of my boat and trailer. The torque required to pull is transfered from engine to transmission to final drive axle to chassis. My Journey is FWD so no torque is transfered to the rear axle. I believe Grand Caravans are the same. The chassis has to be the weak link. I just cant understand why they determined to de-rate the chassis when both have to support 7 passengers. I would assume more people tow with SUV's than with mini vans.
 

Last edited by Steven Cooper; Aug 14, 2017 at 11:44 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2017 | 09:12 AM
  #9  
primem's Avatar
primem
Record Breaker
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,815
Likes: 56
From: Alberta
Default

its part of the equation. the axle supports the weight of the entire vehicle. Look at pickups; solid front axle have greater load capacity than ifs.

the limiting factory is not engine and trans. even the 1500 and 2500 use the same engine trans combo: 04 to 08 gas pickups.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:17 AM.