viper vs gt
ORIGINAL: MidnightBlueNeon
Yes, that is true...
ORIGINAL: turbospirites
I heard that mercedes wont let them build the ME 4-12 because of it beating there super car the slk mclaren.
I heard that mercedes wont let them build the ME 4-12 because of it beating there super car the slk mclaren.
yeah my dad was pissed off about it, and so is many people.
Acceleration, sec
0-30 mph 1.7 1.7
0-40 mph 2.4 2.3
0-50 mph 3.0 2.9
0-60 mph 3.9 3.6
0-70 mph 4.8 4.7
0-80 mph 5.8 5.6
0-90 mph 7.0 6.5
0-100 mph 8.4 8.1
viper / Gt
but the viper wins? BS... so it wins ONCE out of 20 runs. The number can be manipulated however you want... the GT is still faster. If you look long enough you'll find numbers saying the Geo Metro is faster (exaggeration). I mean come on guys... You gotta give credit where credit is due. If your talking 'Bang for the Buck' thats a different story... the Viper is much less expensive for pretty close to the power of the GT. But as far as the viper being faster... Sorry... but no. (not w/ equal drivers and the same road conditions) Maybe you could take a Freak viper vs. a weak GT... but thats SUPER rare.
And for the people saying "Just put a turbo on the viper", Now your talking Apples and Oranges. Then someone COULD put a bigger SC on the GT... Its not easy to just change /upgrade / add a turbo... Especially when they are as fine tuned as these cars. There is SO much work that has to be done to change the compression to except the added TC / SC.
Keep your Apples w/ your Apples and Oranges w/ Oranges. The GT is Faster then the viper -> stock for stock. But the Viper is a WAY! better bang for your buck.
0-30 mph 1.7 1.7
0-40 mph 2.4 2.3
0-50 mph 3.0 2.9
0-60 mph 3.9 3.6
0-70 mph 4.8 4.7
0-80 mph 5.8 5.6
0-90 mph 7.0 6.5
0-100 mph 8.4 8.1
viper / Gt
but the viper wins? BS... so it wins ONCE out of 20 runs. The number can be manipulated however you want... the GT is still faster. If you look long enough you'll find numbers saying the Geo Metro is faster (exaggeration). I mean come on guys... You gotta give credit where credit is due. If your talking 'Bang for the Buck' thats a different story... the Viper is much less expensive for pretty close to the power of the GT. But as far as the viper being faster... Sorry... but no. (not w/ equal drivers and the same road conditions) Maybe you could take a Freak viper vs. a weak GT... but thats SUPER rare.
And for the people saying "Just put a turbo on the viper", Now your talking Apples and Oranges. Then someone COULD put a bigger SC on the GT... Its not easy to just change /upgrade / add a turbo... Especially when they are as fine tuned as these cars. There is SO much work that has to be done to change the compression to except the added TC / SC.
Keep your Apples w/ your Apples and Oranges w/ Oranges. The GT is Faster then the viper -> stock for stock. But the Viper is a WAY! better bang for your buck.

Ford, for example, electronically governs its GT supercar to a top speed of 205 mph, but the vehicle could go faster. According to a company spokesman, it did hit 211 mph at a test track in Nardo, Italy, and "through calibration [the speed governor] could be removed or set at a higher limit"--although Ford does not recommend that, because it certified all systems, including tires, at 205 mph.
Basically, the car's governed to a certain speed and the entire car is certified at that speed.....
I dunno if that applies to the Viper....
Bang for the buck = Viper winning
Basically, the car's governed to a certain speed and the entire car is certified at that speed.....
I dunno if that applies to the Viper....
Bang for the buck = Viper winning




