stock evo vs stock srt-4
#13
#14
#15
RE: stock evo vs stock srt-4
harsh.... whats with people getting all butt hurt with the term rice? come on folks if that term bugs you there might be some other issues you need to look at that are probally more important.
ORIGINAL: NeonSXT04
Yeah, I want to see this vid. I love SRT4 vids. Don't you think the ricer comment is a little harsh RR? LOL. Don't be hatin on the Evo, its actually fast, even if it is a bit ricer.
Yeah, I want to see this vid. I love SRT4 vids. Don't you think the ricer comment is a little harsh RR? LOL. Don't be hatin on the Evo, its actually fast, even if it is a bit ricer.
#16
RE: stock evo vs stock srt-4
ORIGINAL: Gump
harsh.... whats with people getting all butt hurt with the term rice? come on folks if that term bugs you there might be some other issues you need to look at that are probally more important.
harsh.... whats with people getting all butt hurt with the term rice? come on folks if that term bugs you there might be some other issues you need to look at that are probally more important.
ORIGINAL: NeonSXT04
Yeah, I want to see this vid. I love SRT4 vids. Don't you think the ricer comment is a little harsh RR? LOL. Don't be hatin on the Evo, its actually fast, even if it is a bit ricer.
Yeah, I want to see this vid. I love SRT4 vids. Don't you think the ricer comment is a little harsh RR? LOL. Don't be hatin on the Evo, its actually fast, even if it is a bit ricer.
Pfft. You could call my car rice and I wouldn't care. I just generally associate the term "rice" with something that looks fast but is not. Which would rule out the Evo, because it actually is fast. But everyone has a different meaning for the word rice.
#17
RE: stock evo vs stock srt-4
I used the term rice and not ricer, they have completely different meanings. I said it was a rice box and calling it rice is accurate since it is indeed and Asian car, derived from the older term rice burner. And since it is rather square in shape with harsh sharp edges and lines, I called it a rice box. Maybe I should have simply called it Uncle Bens.[sm=icon_rofl.gif] I'm not knocking it's performance, it is one of the best performing cars made, it's just not my style. I highly prefer the STi and I really like them, but I'll take an SRT-4 over both of them any day.
#19
RE: stock evo vs stock srt-4
im not trying to call nobody a liar... but my friend also owns a 2003 evo (stock), i have a 2003 srt-4 (stock), i might not be the best driver, but im not bad, we've taken both cars to a local drag strip (1/8) called yellow belly. well my best time so far was a 9.3 and his time was 8.5 thats almosta second [X(]. the highway its a diferent story but never lost sight of him he was right behind me the whole time. again gilles i'm not trying to call u a lier or nothing im just telling my personal experiences.
#20
RE: stock evo vs stock srt-4
im not trying to call nobody a liar... but my friend also owns a 2003 evo (stock), i have a 2003 srt-4 (stock), i might not be the best driver, but im not bad, we've taken both cars to a local drag strip (1/8) called yellow belly. well my best time so far was a 9.3 and his time was 8.5 thats almosta second . the highway its a diferent story but never lost sight of him he was right behind me the whole time. again gilles i'm not trying to call u a lier or nothing im just telling my personal experiences.
Note: I have also raced them on the road in turns and if you know how to drive a fwd well you can almost hang. If you know how to drive srt-4's extremely well, you can make most of the difference up in acceleration bursts due to instantly available torque.
Wouldn't even try it on a very wet or snowy road, though. The evo would trounce any srt in those situations.
Just my .02.[sm=icon_rock.gif]