I had an '88 Daytona Shelby Z 2.2L Turbo II 4 cylinder and it had well over 200,000 miles on it before I had the engine rebuilt and it's still going to this very day. My stepfathers 2 Honda Accords are in the bone yard with far fewer miles on them than what my Shelby Z had before I had the engine rebuilt. When and where have I said any "mad BS about your SRT-4"? I have never claimed that my SRT-4 was anything other than a great car. The SRT-4 is what it is and that's all, it's a car that beats everything in it's price class and most cars that are double it's price. A little less pricey[sm=wtf.gif], I don't consider $8,000 to $10,000+ to be a little less. If you were to get an SRT-4 and add that much in mods to it, it would not only crush these other cars, but it would be doing the same to far more expensive cars. Yes, an SRT-4 is indeed a Neon, and an STi is an Imprezza and an Evo is a Lancer, what's your point? Just because someone likes the way the SRT-4 looks and you don't is no reason to flame them and make fun of them for it. There is no one on here that has claimed to have perfectly flawless SRT-4's or any other car for that matter regardless of make or model. Every car manufacturer and every model made by them has had problems, none have ever been flawless. Talk about getting real, your the only one that has made the fantastic claims without a shread of proof.



"P.S. Whats wrong roadrunner71 couldnt handle a little joke. (a.k.a. neonster)"

I don't consider flaming, cussing/cursing, misquoting/changing someones words around and acting extremely childish and immature to be "a little joke". If you cannot and will not conduct yourself with proper manners and follow the simple rules of of this forum, then you do not need to be here and you should go elsewhere.

 

What an idiot. Different name, same thoughtless dribble.
[sm=loser.gif]

 

Yep, that it/he is.[sm=bangbang.gif]

 

uh, oh

 

yea thanx for playing dude. im with you on this one rr.