Article: "The Most Rocketing Pocket Rocket of Them All"
Posted in LA Car today: The Most Rocketing Pocket Rocket of Them All
"When Dodge first announced the Neon-based SRT-4, enthusiasts were skeptical. They just couldn't get around the fact that it was based on a Neon. Then, the SRT-4 came out, and it kicked everyone's tail. Highly regarded sport compact cars, such as the Honda Civic Si, Ford Focus SVT, Nissan Sentra SE-R, and Acura RSX S-Type were reduced to road kill. Even the vaunted Subaru WRX (in non-STi form) can't match the 13.9 second quarter-mile elapsed time of the SRT-4. Running 13s in the quarter mile is quite a feat for a muscle car. For a four-cylinder sedan under $21,000, it is mind-boggling. It's now been close to two years since the SRT-4 was announced, and no one is snickering now. During this short time, the SRT-4 reputation has come a long way."
"When Dodge first announced the Neon-based SRT-4, enthusiasts were skeptical. They just couldn't get around the fact that it was based on a Neon. Then, the SRT-4 came out, and it kicked everyone's tail. Highly regarded sport compact cars, such as the Honda Civic Si, Ford Focus SVT, Nissan Sentra SE-R, and Acura RSX S-Type were reduced to road kill. Even the vaunted Subaru WRX (in non-STi form) can't match the 13.9 second quarter-mile elapsed time of the SRT-4. Running 13s in the quarter mile is quite a feat for a muscle car. For a four-cylinder sedan under $21,000, it is mind-boggling. It's now been close to two years since the SRT-4 was announced, and no one is snickering now. During this short time, the SRT-4 reputation has come a long way."
That's a great article. Most of the more well know rags like Motor Trend simple hate it and will rag on it just because it isn't foreign. If this were a Honda it would have been their car of the year.[:@]
well yeah look at the Civic Si how much does that cost, $19,000 if I'm not mistaken, all that for such liitle performance compare to the SRT-4.
Yeah, I don't even read MT any more due to its obvious bias. Road & Track and Car and Driver are much better....
Road and Track covers alot of O/S car makers but they also have alot on the classic race/sports cars of the 50s/60s/70s....C&D is playing to the market as most car magazines are nowdays seeing that such a large chunk of cars come from O/S or at least O/S based companies.....C&D did do a pretty good write up on the SRT-4 in their April 2004 issue though....[&:]
DID C&D give the SRT-4 [sm=smiley10.gif][sm=smiley10.gif][sm=smiley10.gif][sm=smiley10.gif][sm=smiley10.gif]
Trending Topics
Yeah, I have that issue. I copied that page for display at the car shows with a dyno comparison of the top cars in the same price range, nothing else is even close.
You can go to www.caranddriver.com and see the article. Actually there are two, one written in Dec 2002 and the latest written in April 2004....[sm=smiley5.gif]



