Racing Talk Talk about any racing here, whether it be street/strip, NASCAR, F1 etc.

Dakota vs Minivan: Track Times

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 17, 2007 | 12:15 PM
  #51  
curtiplas's Avatar
curtiplas
Record Breaker
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
From: Motor City, Hockey Town, Metro Detroit
Default RE: Dakota vs Minivan: Track Times

Well its not a race car...but who says we can't make em go like a race car....for god sakes if they have NASCAR race Trucks... why can't we make Street Race trucks [sm=lildevil.gif]
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2007 | 08:36 PM
  #52  
RP Racing940's Avatar
RP Racing940
Record Breaker
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,048
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Dakota vs Minivan: Track Times

ORIGINAL: curtiplas

Well its not a race car...but who says we can't make em go like a race car....for god sakes if they have NASCAR race Trucks... why can't we make Street Race trucks [sm=lildevil.gif]
Those napcar race "trucks" are nothing but car chassis with fiberglass pickup looking bodies.They are as much a truck as a Yugo is a sports car.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2007 | 10:26 PM
  #53  
turbot_bird's Avatar
turbot_bird
Record Breaker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,147
Likes: 0
From: Winter Garden, Fl
Default RE: Dakota vs Minivan: Track Times

the supercharger, last I heared the one for earier 4.7's fit
 
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 02:15 AM
  #54  
rookie's Avatar
rookie
Captain
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 660
Likes: 5
From:
Default RE: Dakota vs Minivan: Track Times

so shell out the dough, bolt it on and reset the computer, what do I get 80-90 horses?
 
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 02:17 AM
  #55  
turbot_bird's Avatar
turbot_bird
Record Breaker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,147
Likes: 0
From: Winter Garden, Fl
Default RE: Dakota vs Minivan: Track Times

youll probably need your computer flashed to change the spark table and fuel map
 
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 02:31 AM
  #56  
rookie's Avatar
rookie
Captain
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 660
Likes: 5
From:
Default RE: Dakota vs Minivan: Track Times

what exactly does that entail?
 
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 02:51 AM
  #57  
turbot_bird's Avatar
turbot_bird
Record Breaker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,147
Likes: 0
From: Winter Garden, Fl
Default RE: Dakota vs Minivan: Track Times

I dont know where you would go to have it done check witht he manufacturer of the supercharger
 
Reply
Old May 23, 2007 | 11:05 AM
  #58  
RealityCheck's Avatar
RealityCheck
Thread Starter
|
Rookie
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Default RE: Dakota vs Minivan: Track Times

ORIGINAL: QCDAKblue

Well excuse me, the vue was killer fast for a small suv. It shocked the heck out of alot of people. I had intake and a TRD exhaust on it and that saturn ran a consisitant 6.6 0-60 on my gtech timer. The gtech is pretty accurate as it pegged my M3 at 4.7 0-60 (that is fast) Lets see your mini van run that :}
I have to admit that I didn't know Saturn Vues were that fast - still 6.6 O-60 isn'tquick in the grand scheme of things. In a world whererun-of-the-mill 4 door family cars run 14s in the 1/4 mile (V6 Accord, Camry, Altima, Sonota, etc.), a 15 second vehicle can't really bedescribed as quick. Everyone has their own personal defination of quick. To me,5 seconds or less 0-60 and13s in the 1/4 mile are quick.

BTW, I have a Dakota. The minivan was not mine.

My motorcycle does 0-60 in under 3 seconds, which willdestroy your M3. Like I said, there's always someone quicker/faster.

Finally, G-Techs can be waay off under some circumstances, and things like elevation, temperature andatmospheric pressure can have a huge affect on times (hence NHRA correction factors). My 2000 Lightning ran a 13.1@106 at a good track (Cecil County Dragway) in great conditions (cool, dense air, good traction). I ran it later in the summer (same exact mods)at a poor track (Capitol Raceway) under poor conditions (hot, humid) and it was .6 seconds and 2 mph slower. All of which is why it is hard to compare times for two vehicles unless you know the circumstances. Since I ran my Dakota against my brother's minivan at the same track within minutes of each other, the times are directly comparable, especially since (thanks to AWD on both vehicles) no skill was involved.
 
Reply
Old May 23, 2007 | 11:26 AM
  #59  
sdsdsd's Avatar
sdsdsd
Captain
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
From: Malvern, Pa.
Default RE: Dakota vs Minivan: Track Times

Who cares what it does in 1/4 mile. It's a truck not a sports car !!!
 
Reply
Old May 23, 2007 | 11:50 AM
  #60  
graythang's Avatar
graythang
Record Breaker
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, FL
Default RE: Dakota vs Minivan: Track Times

Look I know it’s a truck “and not a race car” nor is the minivan a race car. I just came back from a camping trip this weekend and I saw a Toyota minivan towing a large popup loaded with six people In the van and stuff on the roof rack. They drove from the Carolinas to Florida. They didn’t need a truck to toque that ride. As much as hate to say it the Dak is a lame duck when it comes to performance. A mid size truck with a V8 should kick butt, Period! The competition (Tacoma, Frontier) have caught up in performance with their V6 and in fact will walk a 3.7 and a 4.7 and give the HO a hard run for the money. If you think the 290 HP in the 08 is going to save the day, it will for 08 and part of 09 until the Japs make the changes needed to do it all over again. Sorry but it’s just the way it is. The poor old Ram is also eating the dust of a 381 hp Tundra with the only saving grace if Dodge finally installs an optional 6.1 Hemi.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:09 AM.