1st Gen Dakota general discussion This section is for general discussions about your 1st gen Dakota. Non tech related Dakota threads belong here.

96 Dakota 2wd V6 to V8 swap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 22, 2021 | 10:07 AM
  #21  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,478
Likes: 4,223
From: Clayton MI
Default

Originally Posted by DakotaStreetMods
Thanks Ralph - I will check it out and yes I meant 318.
Additionally, Hey You had replied a while back and stated the following: "You REALLY want the 46RE. (and it has to be 96 or 97 as well, so you have the provision for the VSS on the tailshaft housing.) There are a LOT of upgrade options for the 46RE trans. "

Do you know if I were to procure a 96 or 97 46RE with the VSS tailshaft hole for the sensor - do I need to mate it with a similar year 5.9 or can the 5.9 be
newer as long as I have the engine harness and computers from the engine year that I purchase?

Not sure if that makes sense, but I'm trying to avoid incompatibility issues between the 5.9 and the A/T electronics (ie VSS). I believe I read that the vehicles newer than 96 or 97 have speed sensor on the rear diff.

Thanks again for your feedback and expertise!
Bolt patterns on the blocks didn't change throughout production, so, any year trans, will bolt to any year engine. 3.9, 5.2, and 5.9 all used the same pattern. The pre-magnum engines did as well, but, the trans may or may not have the cutout for the crank sensor. (but those would be RH in any event.)

Just need to make sure you use the correct year flexplate/torque converter combination. The 5.9 is externally balanced, and where the balance weights were changed from 95-96. On the older versions, the weights were on the torque converter, for the newer versions, the weights moved to the flexplate, and the t/c was neutral balance.
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2021 | 02:15 PM
  #22  
DakotaStreetMods's Avatar
DakotaStreetMods
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
Default

Excellent info and article - thanks! Unfortunately I got a 318 with apparently a 46RH trans. :-(
A tough lesson on my account as I don't need either of them.
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2021 | 02:19 PM
  #23  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,478
Likes: 4,223
From: Clayton MI
Default

Originally Posted by DakotaStreetMods
Excellent info and article - thanks! Unfortunately I got a 318 with apparently a 46RH trans. :-(
A tough lesson on my account as I don't need either of them.
Somebody probably does. Listing 'em on craigslist, or facebook marketplace.
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2021 | 02:28 PM
  #24  
DakotaStreetMods's Avatar
DakotaStreetMods
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
Default

You guys are awesome! I really do appreciate your expertise and feedback!!
I'm really looking forward to this project (although I don't need more projects), however as you can tell I have a lot to learn.
I have two old trucks now and just ordered a 5.9 with harness and PCM from a 96 dodge 1500. Now I need to locate a 46re.
I took the advice forth 5.9 as I want to build a stroker engine.
I'm hoping to be 400 HP or so. Tobe more specific I want the truck to be quick, not necessarily fast.
I'd like to focus on torque over HP with low end mid range punch.
Any suggestions on rear end gearing? I also want to convert to rear disk and 5 lug.

Thanks again!
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2021 | 02:57 PM
  #25  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,478
Likes: 4,223
From: Clayton MI
Default

What size tires do you want to run? What is going to be the trucks primary usage? Plan on doing any towing/hauling with it??

If you are looking for low-end grunt, then don't expect huge horsepower numbers..... An engine that makes a lotta torque down low, isn't going to make a lot of power in the upper ranges.... unless you do forced induction.. than all bets are off. And given the limited scope of intake manifolds available.... Might go with a modified kegger, or hughes air-gap on a 408. (think I would lean toward the hughes...) They appear to be out of stock at hughes at the moment... might wanna chat with 'em, and see if they are going to get anymore of them, or not...... Or, if you are REALLY incredibly lucky, a Mopar M1 2 barrel manifold would be way cool. Match the cam to the RPM range you want the engine to operate at, some good headers, and a tune, and you will build decent, if not stellar power, but, you won't need the right tires to push the house off the foundation either.
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2021 | 05:18 PM
  #26  
DakotaStreetMods's Avatar
DakotaStreetMods
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
Default

All good questions - I plan on just using the truck for sporting around, roasting tires and cruising really. I would like to run 20" wheels with a low aspect ratio tire. I'd like to tub the rear to get some wider tires on the rear as well as wanting to be able to slam it with a full airbag suspension and 4 link rear end. Not sure if I have the notch the frame or not yet. For some reason I have 400 HP in my head as I haven't ever had anything with very much grunt, it's all been 4 banger stuff.
I was planning on staying with fuel injection but not certain.
I don't need numbers - its the performance I'm after really. Thoughts?
I'm totally new to this arena...

Thanks again!
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2021 | 08:24 PM
  #27  
RalphP's Avatar
RalphP
Champion
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,737
Likes: 374
From: Northwest Louisiana
Default

Define "crusing". Just on the boulevards with the rest of the crew, speeds 45MPH and under? Down the 85MPH Interstate?

(Yes, it makes a bit of difference.)

But overall - stiffer rear gears is where I'd start. Do you know what you have in the back now?

RwP
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:41 AM.