1st Gen Dakota Tech 1987 - 1996 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 1st Gen Dakota.

Siggie30- 89' vert build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 13, 2010 | 09:27 PM
  #31  
shadowthedakota's Avatar
shadowthedakota
Record Breaker
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 1
From: Appleton, WI
Default

you should stick the radiator in front of the rad support if there is room. might even try to find a water pump that doesn't stick out so far? good build.

might just be the angle of the pic but it looks like the motor is set more forward.
 

Last edited by shadowthedakota; Dec 13, 2010 at 09:30 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2010 | 09:59 AM
  #32  
siggie30's Avatar
siggie30
Thread Starter
|
Captain
10 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 579
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Default

Possibly, I may have the engine mounting plates on the opposite sides, but searches have proven lacking. Can someone shoot a pic of the original plate setup for the 3.9l V6 for comparison? They appear interchangeable to me, but perhaps I have them upside down and do not realize it.
 
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2010 | 02:15 PM
  #33  
siggie30's Avatar
siggie30
Thread Starter
|
Captain
10 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 579
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Default

I cannot seem to stay logged in for more than one page to load. I am sure somebody can help. I have tried adjusting my cookies, but windows 7 is being difficult.

Here are the stock mounts from a 92 Dakota, which are very different from mine. Should I just swap to these?

Name:  92passside.jpg
Views: 353
Size:  140.3 KB

Name:  92Drvrside.jpg
Views: 360
Size:  144.9 KB


And these are the manifolds off the same 92. Just a rough comparison between the two.

Name:  Exhaustcomparison.jpg
Views: 365
Size:  100.6 KB

Name:  Exhaustcomp2.jpg
Views: 364
Size:  191.7 KB
 
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2010 | 04:37 PM
  #34  
Crazy4x4RT's Avatar
Crazy4x4RT
Hall Of Fame
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,923
Likes: 19
From: NM
Default

The motor mounts look like they bolt up to the same location to me. But I can't see it in person so I can't say for sure.

Pre 90 had the core support that was closer to the engine. 91-up had more room due to a new core support. Maybe Electric fans or swap in a newer radiator core support and grill hood ect.
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2010 | 10:54 PM
  #35  
siggie30's Avatar
siggie30
Thread Starter
|
Captain
10 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 579
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Default

I bought some "newer" mounts just to see if I can get an inch or so. I believe I have a standard duty radiator that will not allow me to get the clearance I need. I will be purchasing a HD radiator after I swap the mounts if neccessary. I will not be changing the front end for clearance.

Finished the preliminary wiring, except for the choke and the sensors (temp, oil pres, voltometer). Will need to wrap them soon.

Drivetrain done except the toggles for the lockup and OD. Not sure if I am going to do the PATC setup yet, but maybe in the Spring. Plus, I need to get the correct speedo cable.

I could really use some pics of the transmission linkage for a V8 dakota automatic (A518). I think I am missing a triangular piece down by the levers. If anyone could snap one off and post it, I would be eternally grateful. Otherwise, I will have to go to the boneyard and scrounge.

Things left to do:

Intake hardware (coolant hoses etc.)

Vacuum lines for brake, PCV, distributor.

Wire loom.

Run the fuel circuit from the tank. I think I will just run new lines. OR I could cheese out and run some braided line from the stearing knuckle.

The stock Y-pipe did not like the new transmission and exhaust manifolds. So I need to go procure a new Y pipe at the yard.

Finish setting the alternator bracketry. Real tricky with the smaller Nippon Denso alternator and the Vbelt setup. I think I have it resolved though.

Radiator and the 2 asociated hoses.

Plumb the transmission cooler lines.

Fill with fluids.

Test fire/ break in.

I will be replacing the entire dash prior to street duty, so that will put me back a weekend. The existing dash is fairly done, but there is a basically new one at the yard that will fit nicely.

Question: Is the box behind the dash on the passenger side for the rear axle ABS?
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 01:59 PM
  #36  
siggie30's Avatar
siggie30
Thread Starter
|
Captain
10 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 579
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Default

A few more pics:


Drvr side exhaust and preliminary linkage

Name:  exhaustds.jpg
Views: 371
Size:  198.6 KB

Pass side exhaust mock

Name:  exhaustps.jpg
Views: 358
Size:  178.5 KB

Pulley clearance (note the angle of the radiator mount, also, I have not swapped mounts yet)

Name:  pulleyclearance.jpg
Views: 365
Size:  137.7 KB
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2010 | 11:19 AM
  #37  
logancounterman's Avatar
logancounterman
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 328
Likes: 1
From: tannersville,pa
Default

wow your truck is awesome. sorry i didn't read the thread are you going to drag it or just a play truck
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2010 | 11:09 AM
  #38  
siggie30's Avatar
siggie30
Thread Starter
|
Captain
10 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 579
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Default

Started routing the coolant lines and fuel lines. I am really getting behind on this thing, but regardless:

Name:  fuelhoserouting.jpg
Views: 390
Size:  162.4 KB


My argument is to use the rod versus the tv cable. I think that the rod will work and finding the correct bracket will not happen, so I am pretty sure that the cable will have to be used. Note the "Summit" carb bracket. It is file to fit with the expansion/locking/isolator clips on the cables. The finish is a crappy chrome as well. I must say I REALLY hate chrome for a DD/WR.

Name:  linkage.jpg
Views: 373
Size:  168.1 KB

This is the rear of my intake (of particular interest here is the EGR port). After reviewing the functionality of PCV systems, I would like to take advantage of the port and use it as a full vacuum port (FVP) for the PCV and bypass the FVP on the carburetor. Any input here is appreciated.

Name:  vacuumportrearmanifold.jpg
Views: 353
Size:  116.9 KB
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2010 | 11:19 AM
  #39  
siggie30's Avatar
siggie30
Thread Starter
|
Captain
10 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 579
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Default

It occured to me recently that some of you may be wondering why I am using an EFI manifold for a carbureted engine. The fuel port area is for a DP nitrous install later. I hope that clarifies the reason. Although that will not happen until the Fall. This manifold (M1) is also the older square bore 4v style that I do not see alot of from looking at other builds (being they are typically 2v (the newer ones and negates the 2v conversion piece). The air cleaner bolt, as is, is about 1/2" from the hood.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2010 | 05:04 PM
  #40  
shadowthedakota's Avatar
shadowthedakota
Record Breaker
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 1
From: Appleton, WI
Default

did the carb mount to the intake alright or did it need an adapter?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:15 PM.