1st Gen Dakota Tech 1987 - 1996 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 1st Gen Dakota.

1995 dodge dakota

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-31-2010, 02:42 PM
dhall's Avatar
dhall
dhall is offline
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face 1995 dodge dakota

Will a 5.9 engine fits 1995 dodge dakota that has a 5.2 in it? If so what modifications are involved?
 
  #2  
Old 12-31-2010, 04:05 PM
mazda7475's Avatar
mazda7475
mazda7475 is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: new glasgow, nova scotia
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

as far as i know dude the 360 will fit into a 318 truck (i'm old school canadian, i know both metric and american). i'm pretty sure there the same block. as for the electronics crazy can fill you in on that one.
 
  #3  
Old 12-31-2010, 08:22 PM
siggie30's Avatar
siggie30
siggie30 is offline
Captain
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Of course it will. It is the exact same block. Holes and everything. The main concern is the balance. Your easiest solution is to get a full long block, the appropriate weighted flexplate/flywheel, correct ECM, the correct injectors if it didn't come with it, and go to it. The 5.2l to 5.9l is extremely easy, but your 5.2l is technically a better engine to mod, in lieu of replacing, costwise. Plus, you can brag about beating the 5.9l after investing the money in the 5.2l. Cam, intake, heads, exhaust. The recipe will never change.
 
  #4  
Old 01-01-2011, 04:44 AM
oxygen454's Avatar
oxygen454
oxygen454 is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lower Mainland BC, Canada
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

My old 81 ramcharger had the option of a 318 or 360 but things may have changed but from what everyone is saying, sounds like it will work.
 
  #5  
Old 01-02-2011, 07:14 PM
dhall's Avatar
dhall
dhall is offline
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks! Appreciate all the info.
 
  #6  
Old 01-02-2011, 07:29 PM
jnjinfla's Avatar
jnjinfla
jnjinfla is offline
Rookie
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes it is a pretty straightforward swap. I did the 5.2-5.9 swap in my 92. Just remember that the 5.9 is balanced on the flywheel so you will need to include that in your swap. Your 5.2 ECM will run the 5.9 but it is best to try and find a 5.9 ECM. I happen to use a performance 5.9 ECM for a 94-95 ram in mine.
 

Last edited by jnjinfla; 01-03-2011 at 07:07 AM.
  #7  
Old 01-03-2011, 04:05 AM
Doug2287's Avatar
Doug2287
Doug2287 is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't agree that the two engines are the same block. Mind you, I am going by what I know from the first generation 318 and 360 engines. The 360 engine has a longer stroke than the 318 engine. They are both of the same engine family, and one will bolt in place of the other, but the internal parts (crankshaft, pistons, rods, harmonic balancer) will not interchange from one engine to the other. I would recommend changing computers to the engine you are swapping to. However, I suspect you could get away without it.
 
  #8  
Old 01-03-2011, 01:50 PM
Crazy4x4RT's Avatar
Crazy4x4RT
Crazy4x4RT is offline
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NM
Posts: 10,926
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Doug2287
I don't agree that the two engines are the same block. Mind you, I am going by what I know from the first generation 318 and 360 engines. The 360 engine has a longer stroke than the 318 engine. They are both of the same engine family, and one will bolt in place of the other, but the internal parts (crankshaft, pistons, rods, harmonic balancer) will not interchange from one engine to the other. I would recommend changing computers to the engine you are swapping to. However, I suspect you could get away without it.
They are EXTERNALLY the same. Magnum 5.2 and 5.9. As well as the 3.9 V6 just the V6 is shorter in the front. All 3 are swappable the mounting locations are EXACTLY the same.

The same for the LA pre Magnums. 318 and 360 are EXTERNALLY the same and the 3.9 V6 (I don't know the CI if it.) too just sort in front. All 3 are Swappable, the mounting locations are EXACTLY the same.

The Magnums and LA's both have the EXACT mounting locations as each other. Some LA's don't have the bosses drilled and tapped. All 6 are swappable, a few may need a little work. All 6 bell housings are the same as well.
 

Last edited by Crazy4x4RT; 01-03-2011 at 01:53 PM.
  #9  
Old 01-03-2011, 03:32 PM
siggie30's Avatar
siggie30
siggie30 is offline
Captain
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Doug2287
I don't agree that the two engines are the same block. Mind you, I am going by what I know from the first generation 318 and 360 engines. The 360 engine has a longer stroke than the 318 engine. They are both of the same engine family, and one will bolt in place of the other, but the internal parts (crankshaft, pistons, rods, harmonic balancer) will not interchange from one engine to the other. I would recommend changing computers to the engine you are swapping to. However, I suspect you could get away without it.

If you sat a 5.2l and a 5.9l block side by side, you could not differentiate between them. I understand the mains bore diameter, and piston bore difference, yada yada, but the two blocks are physically the same size (exterior holes and everything). Same as with the 318 and 360 blocks. I do know that the casting numbers are different, but with the exception of the aformentioned differences, they are statistically identical. Chevy did it with the 305 and 350, Ford with the 260-289-302 (a very common "stock" upgrade in a classic).
Historically, if you were to throw them into water, they would sink, because they are irregularly shaped, not because they are made of pig iron. (personal humor about physics).
 

Last edited by siggie30; 01-04-2011 at 04:32 PM.



Quick Reply: 1995 dodge dakota



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:46 AM.