1st Gen Dakota Tech 1987 - 1996 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 1st Gen Dakota.

Found this Y pipe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 13, 2017 | 12:53 AM
  #1  
onemore94dak's Avatar
onemore94dak
Thread Starter
|
Champion
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,723
Likes: 152
Default Found this Y pipe

Found this while looking for the correct OE O2 sensor on my 94 dak

http://www.ebay.com/itm/JBA-Headers-...Model%3ADakota
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2017 | 05:53 AM
  #2  
93 ragtop's Avatar
93 ragtop
Record Breaker
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 109
From: Va
Default

I have seen that before...... I believe it is stock size, but its two advantages seem to be 1. stainless, 2. mandrel bends.
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2017 | 10:32 AM
  #3  
onemore94dak's Avatar
onemore94dak
Thread Starter
|
Champion
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,723
Likes: 152
Default

I posted it because of the mandrel bends. I have the $45 Walker Y with the crinkle in it. There is a joint in the middle of the Y that I figured can be welded once it's fit and clamped.
Your post made me look at it again as the "stainless" did not register with me. The appearance is of carbon steel and the first review at the bottom complains that it is not stainless when he received it. He also says it did not fit without having to dent it on the passenger side and complains the bell was too small and he had to have it enlarged 1/4 inch at a shop. If that is all he needed he could have got it by tightening driving it and tightening it again while hot. I was just figuring it would be good for anyone looking to have a new Y with mandrel bends. The price I don't believe. Sure seems way high for bending pipes not even to direct fit. I could see it maybe if it was stainless and one piece but even then that's high.
 

Last edited by onemore94dak; Aug 14, 2017 at 10:35 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2017 | 10:54 AM
  #4  
93 ragtop's Avatar
93 ragtop
Record Breaker
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 109
From: Va
Default

In addition to the mandrel bends, it appears to be less restrictive in the y connection......
Here are my thoughts on future mods. What about using a set of shorty headers, cut the flange off. The collectors seem to be 2.5 in. Then have a exhaust bent in 2.5 stainless, use a slip connector at the collector end, and , run dual exhaust in 2.5 in . if possible. If not y back to a 3in and run a single 3 in exhaust.
Just a thought. BTW thanks for posting the link for the y pipe.
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2017 | 11:58 AM
  #5  
RalphP's Avatar
RalphP
Champion
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,737
Likes: 374
From: Northwest Louisiana
Default

That price is because it's for headers ...

Too bad they don't have one to fit 92/93 Dakotas with the larger manifolds and exhaust pipes, since Walker shows theirs to be NLA now.

RwP
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2017 | 02:50 PM
  #6  
93 ragtop's Avatar
93 ragtop
Record Breaker
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 109
From: Va
Default

Originally Posted by RalphP
That price is because it's for headers ...

Too bad they don't have one to fit 92/93 Dakotas with the larger manifolds and exhaust pipes, since Walker shows theirs to be NLA now.

RwP


Actually its for stock manifolds or their shorty headers, (along with everybody else who makes them)

But in addition to the early y not made anymore, I cant find anyone who makes the early manifolds.

Thats the reason I have been considering shorty headers, cut the flange off so you are back to a 2.5 collector, and then work from there.
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2017 | 07:25 PM
  #7  
RalphP's Avatar
RalphP
Champion
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,737
Likes: 374
From: Northwest Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by RalphP
That price is because it's for headers ...

Too bad they don't have one to fit 92/93 Dakotas with the larger manifolds and exhaust pipes, since Walker shows theirs to be NLA now.

RwP
Originally Posted by 93 ragtop



Actually its for stock manifolds or their shorty headers, (along with everybody else who makes them)

But in addition to the early y not made anymore, I cant find anyone who makes the early manifolds.

Thats the reason I have been considering shorty headers, cut the flange off so you are back to a 2.5 collector, and then work from there.
No, you misunderstand me.

Yes, it fits standard exhaust manifolds also.

The PRICE is because it fits their headers

RwP
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2017 | 09:10 AM
  #8  
93 ragtop's Avatar
93 ragtop
Record Breaker
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 109
From: Va
Default

Originally Posted by RalphP
No, you misunderstand me.

Yes, it fits standard exhaust manifolds also.

The PRICE is because it fits their headers

RwP


You are correct, that went right over my head!!
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:12 AM.