1st Gen Dakota Tech 1987 - 1996 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 1st Gen Dakota.

Finished the 360 swap, runs great :)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-03-2022 | 03:28 PM
tbugden's Avatar
tbugden
Thread Starter
|
All Star
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 941
Likes: 22
From: Connecticut
Default Finished the 360 swap, runs great :)

It's very smooth and makes a fair bit more power than the 318 I had. Also working well with the 318 PCM. Supposedly it will run lean at higher RPMs, but I did a couple pulls and it didn't seem to falter. Besides, it'll hardly see 3k RPM in regular driving anyway.

I guess, nothing in this picture proves it's a 360 so I guess you'll have to take my word for it


 
The following 2 users liked this post by tbugden:
bronze (03-03-2022), onemore94dak (03-03-2022)
  #2  
Old 03-03-2022 | 03:36 PM
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 82,706
Likes: 3,425
From: Clayton MI
Default

Need a different air cleaner cover that SAYS "360". I know they are out there.
 
  #3  
Old 03-03-2022 | 03:38 PM
tbugden's Avatar
tbugden
Thread Starter
|
All Star
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 941
Likes: 22
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by HeyYou
Need a different air cleaner cover that SAYS "360". I know they are out there.
Oh that's a good idea!
 
  #4  
Old 03-03-2022 | 05:14 PM
bronze's Avatar
bronze
Record Breaker
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,016
Likes: 439
From: North Carolina
Default

Nice!
 
The following users liked this post:
tbugden (03-03-2022)
  #5  
Old 03-04-2022 | 06:29 PM
tbugden's Avatar
tbugden
Thread Starter
|
All Star
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 941
Likes: 22
From: Connecticut
Default

I've put about 50 miles on it and it's perfect, except I'm chasing a high idle that I had with the 318 too. I thought it was a Vac leak but I've gone over everything and tested the system--no leaks. Still idles around 8-900 RPM when warm.

I'm wondering if it has anything to do with the auto PCM running a manual engine. Expecting the drag from the transmission oil pump or something? I have no idea, just spitballing.

Not a terribly big deal as "city" driving is only about 0.1% of my driving but ideally I like things to work properly if anyone has an idea.
 
  #6  
Old 03-05-2022 | 08:48 AM
ol' grouch's Avatar
ol' grouch
Champion
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 4,440
Likes: 599
From: S.W. Indiana
Default

Originally Posted by HeyYou
Need a different air cleaner cover that SAYS "360". I know they are out there.

I'd see about swapping the pie pan on the air cleaner with one that says "440 Magnum" or something like that. Have a little fun with people.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by ol' grouch:
bronze (03-05-2022), tbugden (03-05-2022)
  #7  
Old 03-05-2022 | 08:54 AM
bronze's Avatar
bronze
Record Breaker
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,016
Likes: 439
From: North Carolina
Default

Or ".357 Magnum".
 
The following 2 users liked this post by bronze:
Lotus_65 (03-08-2022), tbugden (03-05-2022)
  #8  
Old 03-11-2022 | 04:17 PM
93 ragtop's Avatar
93 ragtop
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,812
Likes: 102
From: Va
Default

Well that was a fast swap! Did you use the 318 injectors? If not I wonder if maybe the 5.9 are a different size and maybe conflict with your 5.2 computer. Just a thought.
 
  #9  
Old 03-12-2022 | 10:12 AM
tbugden's Avatar
tbugden
Thread Starter
|
All Star
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 941
Likes: 22
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by 93 ragtop
Well that was a fast swap! Did you use the 318 injectors? If not I wonder if maybe the 5.9 are a different size and maybe conflict with your 5.2 computer. Just a thought.
I did consider that. I did use the 318 injectors though, cuz they were in good shape and already in the intake manifold. Seems to run okay though, definitely doesn't fall on its face and it's got TONS of torque for a little truck, I can just leave it in 4th going 20 mph up hills lol. I don't make a habit of that but it's nice to know how much pull that it's got. Especially considering it should have 50 ft lbs more over a HEALTHY 5.2 and my 5.2 was far from healthy with a totally dead cylinder..so it's probably more like 75 ft lbs at least more than what I'm used to.
 
  #10  
Old 03-12-2022 | 11:15 AM
bronze's Avatar
bronze
Record Breaker
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,016
Likes: 439
From: North Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by tbugden
I did consider that. I did use the 318 injectors though, cuz they were in good shape and already in the intake manifold. Seems to run okay though, definitely doesn't fall on its face and it's got TONS of torque for a little truck, I can just leave it in 4th going 20 mph up hills lol. I don't make a habit of that but it's nice to know how much pull that it's got. Especially considering it should have 50 ft lbs more over a HEALTHY 5.2 and my 5.2 was far from healthy with a totally dead cylinder..so it's probably more like 75 ft lbs at least more than what I'm used to.
A 5.9 would be nice but I'll never complain about my 5.2.

Crazy enuf, but I had a new catalytic converter put in last July. Replaced the original which was shot beyond recognition. My 5.2L has had more pep ever since. Kinda nice to get a boost like that.
 
The following users liked this post:
tndakman (03-12-2022)


Quick Reply: Finished the 360 swap, runs great :)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:02 AM.