1st Gen Dakota Tech 1987 - 1996 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 1st Gen Dakota.

360 in a first gen dak.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 26, 2006 | 05:51 AM
  #31  
Ryathis's Avatar
Ryathis
Thread Starter
|
Rookie
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 360 in a first gen dak.

So for christmas, I bought myself a book on Small block A engines from mopar performance to plan my motor build up/research it some. I know i am no where even close to doing it but i like ta plan ahead.

Current thoughts are:
cam shaft: Mopar part number p4452759 duration 260/268 Lift .430/.450

Intake: Mopar part number p4529116 MP m1 Dual plane intake

for a carb either a 650 or 750 CFM cant decide yet.

Headers: 1 and 5/8ths tube headers

Heads: 308 "swirl port" if i have extra money, might get a vavle job,

Pistons: either 8.66:1 or 9.5:1,

Cant decide on a few things, and still need to research rocker arms/lifters/valve springs.

Just thought id get your guys input

Merry Christmas to all!
 
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2006 | 10:25 PM
  #32  
CB's Avatar
CB
Rookie
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 360 in a first gen dak.

ORIGINAL: Ryathis

Yah was just thinkin ahead on how ill get traction, do those traction bars actually help at all? I plan on going with a posi, and probably somethin right around a 3.08 rear end ratio, without an overdrive i dont wanna be be pullin too high of a ratio.
Yes, traction bars make a HUGE difference. They reduce axle wrap... that's when your leaf springs twist, making your rear end rock back and forth which kills your 60ft times.
 
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2006 | 11:03 PM
  #33  
kayakman's Avatar
kayakman
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
From: Nova Scotia
Default RE: 360 in a first gen dak.

Hi Rayathis, usually I look in the ram forum, but my eye caught your posting and I did have a 91' Dak with a 318 - V8. This was the first full production Dak with a V8. Oh I know there was other years with a limited V8 production.

I was thinking of putting a cam in it for more pulling power fortowing. When the supplier could not find a cam right away, he had to call me back, which he did.
What we found out was a 1991 318 Dakota was a smaller unit than what would be in a 1991 318 Ram. This was to make it fit in the Dak even with the nose rounded out, a regular 318 would not have fitted.
Also the 1991-318 was a Magnum motor with throttle body fuel injection - 92' was multi port. This was an unique motor. The thing went like sink with a 3:91 AXLE.
Good luck with your project.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:50 AM.