1st Gen Durango 1998 - 2003 Durango's

Durango SAS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 6, 2017 | 03:22 AM
  #1  
Skreewy420's Avatar
Skreewy420
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default Durango SAS

OK so my question is since the durangos do not have a solid front axle would I be able to do a full swap if I have a donor ram for the front axle and a rear axle swap, could I use all the driving components and suspension for the front and rear from the ram
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2017 | 06:44 AM
  #2  
shrpshtr325's Avatar
shrpshtr325
THE ULTI-MOD
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,797
Likes: 36
From: Union NJ
Default

i believe the answer is no since the RAM trucks are wider than the durangos, the axles would be too long.

there is a guy in the 2nd gen dakota section who has done a SAS on his dakota, it should be the same if you can find his thread it should have alot of information
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2017 | 08:46 AM
  #3  
JeeperDon's Avatar
JeeperDon
All Star
10 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 993
Likes: 11
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

Originally Posted by Skreewy420
OK so my question is since the durangos do not have a solid front axle would I be able to do a full swap if I have a donor ram for the front axle and a rear axle swap, could I use all the driving components and suspension for the front and rear from the ram
You can swap whatever you want into whatever you want. The difficulty, expense and work effort will just vary. You can lift, use 40" tires, cut fenders, change gear ratios, etc. Only you can decide if the project in your head is too large for your wallet, skill, time, and effort.

[Sorry, Jeep thinking, skys the limit.]
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2017 | 01:09 PM
  #4  
44dakota's Avatar
44dakota
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 333
Likes: 1
From: new knoxville,ohio
Default

you can use full size axles, just buy wheels with more offset if you dont want them sticking out so much, my front axle is a dana 44 out of a full size 77 f150..
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2017 | 08:24 AM
  #5  
Pspklutch's Avatar
Pspklutch
Veteran
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 428
Likes: 2
From: Oklahoma
Default

You'll find more info on Dakotas. Dana 44 is a good bet. Ram 1500s of our generation only used dana 35s and 30s I believe so I wouldn't touch one of those. But as far as axle width, I'm 99% sure the Durangos use full width rear axles, just offset wheels to the inside. I read and compared a long time ago.
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2017 | 09:25 AM
  #6  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,479
Likes: 4,223
From: Clayton MI
Default

2nd Gen Rams (94-01) had Dana 44's up front.
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2017 | 07:13 PM
  #7  
Pspklutch's Avatar
Pspklutch
Veteran
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 428
Likes: 2
From: Oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by HeyYou
2nd Gen Rams (94-01) had Dana 44's up front.
Odd. Gonna have to climb up under it again. Checked the ID tag on my buddy's 2000 1500 to get a pinion bearing and seal and according to the axle ID tag it turned up to be a 35 and I did some research and people said the 35 was very common. It's a very small differential housing, not what I would expect to find underneath a half ton truck with a cast iron V8 but that's what it said.
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2017 | 07:25 PM
  #8  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,479
Likes: 4,223
From: Clayton MI
Default

Originally Posted by Pspklutch
Odd. Gonna have to climb up under it again. Checked the ID tag on my buddy's 2000 1500 to get a pinion bearing and seal and according to the axle ID tag it turned up to be a 35 and I did some research and people said the 35 was very common. It's a very small differential housing, not what I would expect to find underneath a half ton truck with a cast iron V8 but that's what it said.
Indeed. I wonder if it was changed at some point in the trucks life, as so far as I know, the 44 was standard on the half tons.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2017 | 12:12 PM
  #9  
Pspklutch's Avatar
Pspklutch
Veteran
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 428
Likes: 2
From: Oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by HeyYou
Indeed. I wonder if it was changed at some point in the trucks life, as so far as I know, the 44 was standard on the half tons.
Definitely weird. All the parts lookups were showing parts for Dana 35 as well so I don't know. It's a very small differential I know that. I wouldn't trust it under my truck. A 44 I would but not what's under my buddy's truck
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2017 | 02:29 PM
  #10  
adukart's Avatar
adukart
Record Breaker
10 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,387
Likes: 41
From: Bismarck, ND
Default

Originally Posted by Pspklutch
Definitely weird. All the parts lookups were showing parts for Dana 35 as well so I don't know. It's a very small differential I know that. I wouldn't trust it under my truck. A 44 I would but not what's under my buddy's truck
As far as I have ever seen all 1500 4x4s had a dana 44. The durangos and dakotas had a 35 ifs until 2000 when they switched to a chrysler 8" ifs iirc. Randy's ring and pinion only lists a dana 44 for the 1500 as well.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:05 PM.