2nd Gen Dakota Tech 1997 - 2004 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 2nd Gen Dakota.

2003 dak 4.7 vs 04 hemi?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23, 2009 | 06:16 PM
  #11  
habiak's Avatar
habiak
Rookie
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Alberta Canada
Default

dont ask us just run em and see who wins
 
Reply
Old May 23, 2009 | 07:16 PM
  #12  
bpark8824's Avatar
bpark8824
Champion
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 2
From: Plattsburgh, NY
Default

well i remember bryant did a couple runs in his and could only get like a 12 sec 0-60 with a 5 speed quad cab. So if that is really how fast they are 0-60, then I don't think you will be able to beat him but then again the rams are huge so I don't know.

And we won't know until you run him so please do lol.
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2009 | 04:26 AM
  #13  
Loud Pedal's Avatar
Loud Pedal
The Total Package
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Default

Originally Posted by tamcnally
Dak'a are the fastest trucks ever created.
coming from a guy with a 3.7L pfffffffffffffffffhahhahahahah!!!!
Originally Posted by tamcnally
its not the size of your engine that matters, its how you use it...
again....vee sux..cough cough... i ment v6
Originally Posted by bpark8824
The QC daks aren't all that fast. I think hes got you.
he also has a QC...plus bigger tires...and the same intake/exhaust work...it ought to be damn near even
Originally Posted by reddakota34
Dood you will smoke him 1500 hemi's arnt that fast plus he has 36 inch tires on it, you have nothing to worry about!
coming from a guy with 71 post...hahaha go away noob!!
Originally Posted by revdodge600sdi
the daks got a challange infront of it..haha
it ought to be pretty even...id say run em and video it!!!
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2009 | 09:06 AM
  #14  
bpark8824's Avatar
bpark8824
Champion
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 2
From: Plattsburgh, NY
Default

Yeah we don't need bench racing... Just run him and then we will know.
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2009 | 03:21 PM
  #15  
big.bryant's Avatar
big.bryant
Champion
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,664
Likes: 0
From: University of Colorado-Boulder
Default

yeah mine was pretty slow, it should be better with my new clutch (stage 2 which will hook up better) but I haven't had a chance to run it, that and I am just going to wait for my cams and superchips then I will see how much quicker it is

Just make sure you get it and put it up on youtube so we have some "proof"
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2009 | 03:24 PM
  #16  
Blown287's Avatar
Blown287
Grand Champion
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,293
Likes: 3
From: Kekaha, HI
Default

Originally Posted by bpark8824
The QC daks aren't all that fast.
There's one or two out there
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2009 | 03:26 PM
  #17  
big.bryant's Avatar
big.bryant
Champion
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,664
Likes: 0
From: University of Colorado-Boulder
Default

Originally Posted by Blown287
There's one or two out there
lol I would be one of them if they still made superchargers for 01's
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2009 | 03:28 PM
  #18  
Blown287's Avatar
Blown287
Grand Champion
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,293
Likes: 3
From: Kekaha, HI
Default

Originally Posted by big.bryant
lol I would be one of them if they still made superchargers for 01's
STS Turbo Superchargers are out there you just have to find them.
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2009 | 10:07 PM
  #19  
Loud Pedal's Avatar
Loud Pedal
The Total Package
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Default

true that!!!! turbos are more effiecient IMO
 
Reply
Old May 25, 2009 | 12:09 AM
  #20  
Hahns5.2's Avatar
Hahns5.2
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 3
From: Battle Ground WA
Default

I saw a mostly stock 4.7 (intake exhaust) QC auto running at the strip a couple weeks ago, it was running a 17.5, a full second slower than my truck.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:25 AM.