2nd Gen Dakota Tech 1997 - 2004 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 2nd Gen Dakota.

might become a traitor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 09:19 PM
  #21  
bpark8824's Avatar
bpark8824
Champion
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 2
From: Plattsburgh, NY
Default

Get a 5.2 then, you can mod the $hit out of those...

Just don't down grade your self to a Yota. The Dakota is best in class in power, towing, looks, IMO and many others, and the 96 yota will rot like its been sitting in a big bucket of salt water. POS yotas and their unbelievable frame rust.
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2009 | 01:52 AM
  #22  
User's Avatar
User
Champion
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 6
From: Roanoke, Texas
Default

... is all she wrote ...
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2009 | 12:59 PM
  #23  
DuckandDodge's Avatar
DuckandDodge
Professional
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 129
Likes: 1
From: Tampa, FL
Default

don't do this to yourself. you obviously don't want it. why else would you make a thread telling us to tell you not to do it?

and wtf i only get 13.8 mpg with 3.9 2wd and i dont have a lead foot. what do you guys think could help raise my mpg?
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2009 | 03:04 PM
  #24  
CSCustomCars's Avatar
CSCustomCars
All Star
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 955
Likes: 10
From: Upstate NY
Default

^^ I was kinda thinking the same thing.

I've got a 4x4 4.7 auto, but I do kinda have a bit of a lead foot. City I get 14.5-15, and highway I get 17-17.5. Idk if that's about right or not.
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2009 | 06:35 PM
  #25  
usmrocks's Avatar
usmrocks
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: mississippi
Default

not really sure if i'll even get a new truck at all. it was more of me thinking it over when he said he was gunna sell it. but i've been looking around and can't really find one as cheap as ya'll are saying with a v8. i think i could talk him lower before any of the v8's with that low of mileage
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2009 | 06:36 PM
  #26  
rpowell's Avatar
rpowell
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 368
Likes: 1
From: Burleson, TX
Default

Originally Posted by CSCustomCars
^^ I was kinda thinking the same thing.

I've got a 4x4 4.7 auto, but I do kinda have a bit of a lead foot. City I get 14.5-15, and highway I get 17-17.5. Idk if that's about right or not.
Yeah your pretty close, but its always that way for 4X4w/4.7 auto.
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2009 | 07:48 PM
  #27  
bpark8824's Avatar
bpark8824
Champion
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 2
From: Plattsburgh, NY
Default

Originally Posted by DuckandDodge
don't do this to yourself. you obviously don't want it. why else would you make a thread telling us to tell you not to do it?

and wtf i only get 13.8 mpg with 3.9 2wd and i dont have a lead foot. what do you guys think could help raise my mpg?
3.9 + QC + auto = horrible gas milage.
- the 3.9 does poorly to begin with
- QC's are much heavier, more weight, less mpg
- a dodge auto is horrible at getting power to the rear wheels, weighs more, and obviously manuals do better with mpg

To tell you the truth I do better w/ my 4.7 5speed 4x4 then i did with my 3.9 auto 2wd... and by a good bit too.

You got a triple kill on the whole gas consumption thing there... sorry bud, but a good tune up can never hurt

And USM whats your budget? I paid 7k for my truck, and I now you could get one for around that or less especially depending on your area.
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2009 | 10:04 PM
  #28  
usmrocks's Avatar
usmrocks
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: mississippi
Default

i'm not really looking and don't have budget but i think i could get this tacoma if i wanted to for 5k or less
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:08 PM.