2nd Gen Dakota Tech 1997 - 2004 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 2nd Gen Dakota.

12.5 mpg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 26, 2020 | 09:16 PM
  #11  
magnethead's Avatar
magnethead
Legend
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,058
Likes: 183
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default

An 02 socket will make life easier at times, just depends on position. If you can swing a 12" long wrench and not hit anything, go for it.o, m

also, a coworker in Houston took his 40 foot 5'er to Black Hills, South Dakota and back for a 2 week vacation. He has a 6.7 powersuck and averaged 12.5 MPG for his whole trip.
 
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2020 | 09:58 AM
  #12  
Mopar44134's Avatar
Mopar44134
Amateur
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Parma ohio
Default

i have a 2000 extended cab 4.7 4x4, 3.91's ac works, 217k. i only drive city, 5 miles each way to work. 14mpg. my lil ram has 4 o2's. ive been getting cat 1 efficiency codes for a while. Now my truck has be lightened significantly thanks to north east ohio winters.
 
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2020 | 02:56 PM
  #13  
Dodgevity's Avatar
Dodgevity
Thread Starter
|
Champion
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 3,771
Likes: 448
From: Atlanta
Default

Originally Posted by Mopar44134
Now my truck has be lightened significantly thanks to north east ohio winters.
Rust?
 
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2020 | 06:43 PM
  #14  
Skreelink's Avatar
Skreelink
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Default

Don't be fooled by how easy those O2 sensors LOOK to get at. They'll somehow teleport your hand a foot over and guarantee a busted knuckle.

I've changed to more city driving and my MPG has tanked a bit. I used to averag 50/50 16-17MPG. Last fuel up was a grand 14.5... Ouch. '98 RC 3.9L auto. It is, however, due for an oil change, anyone wanna volunteer?
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2020 | 09:37 AM
  #15  
Dodgevity's Avatar
Dodgevity
Thread Starter
|
Champion
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 3,771
Likes: 448
From: Atlanta
Default

I just purchased a pair of Denso sensors last night on
Amazon Amazon
for roughly 24 bucks apiece (dealer quoted me $134 apiece for Mopar). Lets see if they have an effect on mileage.



I've federal got emissions, same sensor for upstream and down. At 50 bucks for the pair, I can swallow the loss if there is absolutely no difference in mileage. They're so cheap that I wondered if they were knockoffs, but when I looked them up on the Denso website, some of their recommended sellers were also selling them for that price, while some had em for double.

For future reference in case someone is looking...

https://densoautoparts.com/find-my-p...#ProductDetail (Click cross ref and type in your Mopar part # below)

My Mopar part number (dealer ran my VIN) = 56028765AA
Denso cross referenced part = 234-4718
 

Last edited by Dodgevity; Sep 11, 2020 at 01:53 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2020 | 06:27 PM
  #16  
Vimes's Avatar
Vimes
Veteran
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 451
Likes: 64
From: Midwest
Default

Denso makes a pretty good sensor, it's one of my go-to brands. They're OEM for Toyota, which is where I started using them. Used to have a 2006 Corolla for a work beater until my knee couldn't handle the stick anymore and I had to get an auto. Now have a 2008 Colorado for a beater.
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2020 | 08:43 PM
  #17  
Dodgevity's Avatar
Dodgevity
Thread Starter
|
Champion
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 3,771
Likes: 448
From: Atlanta
Default

Originally Posted by Skreelink
Don't be fooled by how easy those O2 sensors LOOK to get at. They'll somehow teleport your hand a foot over and guarantee a busted knuckle
Sensors got here pretty quick. Now to build up the will power to get the job done and not have them sitting on the shelf for months. I don't relish getting under the truck these days and Skreelink is right, getting at least one of them unplugged is going to be a knuckle buster.





 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2020 | 08:57 PM
  #18  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,413
Likes: 4,214
From: Clayton MI
Default

Yeah, I really don't know what the engineers were thinkin' with the locations of some of those connectors..... (aside from maybe... "Take that you idiots!! Good luck with that one.") I am firmly convinced that engineers/designers HATE technicians.
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2020 | 09:05 PM
  #19  
magnethead's Avatar
magnethead
Legend
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,058
Likes: 183
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default

Yea, the downstream is likely on top of the transmission.
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2020 | 11:43 PM
  #20  
Vimes's Avatar
Vimes
Veteran
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 451
Likes: 64
From: Midwest
Default

Originally Posted by HeyYou
Yeah, I really don't know what the engineers were thinkin' with the locations of some of those connectors..... (aside from maybe... "Take that you idiots!! Good luck with that one.") I am firmly convinced that engineers/designers HATE technicians.
After years and years of working on GM stuff I'm fully convinced GM has a department whose sole function in life is to make life harder on mechanics. I swear it's the only way to explain why stuff that could be put anywhere is put in the one place that it almost but won't quite come off without spending an hour removing several unrelated items. I wouldn't be a bit surprised if all three automakers had the same engineering thoughts on this. After all, they're all in Detroit, you know they all get together for beers on the weekend and talk shop, and when they job hop they're all right there in the same place.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:02 PM.