2nd Gen Dakota Tech 1997 - 2004 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 2nd Gen Dakota.

First Time Buyer (2000-2004 Dakota)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 04-03-2023, 03:55 PM
KG911's Avatar
KG911
KG911 is offline
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default First Time Buyer (2000-2004 Dakota)

Hey all, potential first time buyer of a 2000-2004 Dodge Dakota. Have found a few options right around 100K miles which is my soft target (the lower the better without paying a lot). I'm sure there are a bunch of historical threads on things to worry about/look for when buying a used truck. Any thoughts from the rest of the forum would be great.

Any insights on the 2wd vs. 4wd, automatic vs. manual, and any particular year that has had more problems than others? Any areas (frame, engine mounts, etc.) to focus on when buying? Thanks in advance.
 
  #2  
Old 04-03-2023, 04:55 PM
KillerLemming's Avatar
KillerLemming
KillerLemming is offline
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 164
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KG911
Hey all, potential first time buyer of a 2000-2004 Dodge Dakota. Have found a few options right around 100K miles which is my soft target (the lower the better without paying a lot). I'm sure there are a bunch of historical threads on things to worry about/look for when buying a used truck. Any thoughts from the rest of the forum would be great.

Any insights on the 2wd vs. 4wd, automatic vs. manual, and any particular year that has had more problems than others? Any areas (frame, engine mounts, etc.) to focus on when buying? Thanks in advance.
The biggest thing to look out for is make sure the auto trans is in good condition and shifts smooth, Manual is definitely preferable. 2wd vs 4wd is kinda a personal preference IMO.
 
  #3  
Old 04-03-2023, 07:32 PM
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
HeyYou is offline
Administrator
Dodge Forum Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Clayton MI
Posts: 81,531
Likes: 0
Received 3,273 Likes on 3,020 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KillerLemming
The biggest thing to look out for is make sure the auto trans is in good condition and shifts smooth, Manual is definitely preferable. 2wd vs 4wd is kinda a personal preference IMO.
Even manual vs. auto is more personal preference.

I actually take something I am considering buying into my local shop, and have it inspected. They will find stuff that I wouldn't even think to look for. Yep, it costs money. (generally, and hour labor... or less) But, it has saved my bacon more than once.
 
  #4  
Old 04-03-2023, 07:54 PM
Dodgevity's Avatar
Dodgevity
Dodgevity is offline
Champion
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 3,552
Received 379 Likes on 340 Posts
Default

I'd stick with 2003-2004 because they have rear disk brakes and the larger twin piston front calipers. Otherwise you'll end up with rear drums and weaker + more problematic front calipers. Stay away from 2000. I can't remember all the reasons, but it's a quirky year, from the many threads I've read.

I love a stick, but personally I'd do automatic with these trucks. My 545RFE has been flawless even now at 340K and it will be hard finding a stick anyway. Finding one with a tow package (that hasn't towed all it's life) would be another plus. Tow package comes with HD cooling for engine and trans. Good cooling = longer life. Find something that has had ATF fluid replacements. Stay away from trucks with glazed looking dipsticks. Dipsticks that get checked and wiped don't get glazed and crusty, meaning someone is keeping up with the oil level.

As for 4WD vs 2WD, the latter is less to break and simpler to maintain. If you don't have to deal with snow a lot, I'd go with the 2wd. Bring along a code reader. Gas the truck hard in place (owners won't like this). Lotsa smoke is not a good sign
 

Last edited by Dodgevity; 04-03-2023 at 10:18 PM.
The following users liked this post:
V8Cowboy (04-05-2023)
  #5  
Old 04-03-2023, 10:11 PM
magnethead's Avatar
magnethead
magnethead is offline
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 7,975
Received 161 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Also need to know where you're at. The front cab mounts tend to rot quite quickly, even if the rocker panel is intact.
 
  #6  
Old 04-07-2023, 08:12 AM
steve05ram360's Avatar
steve05ram360
steve05ram360 is offline
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 12,817
Received 225 Likes on 210 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dodgevity
I'd stick with 2003-2004 because they have rear disk brakes and the larger twin piston front calipers. Otherwise you'll end up with rear drums and weaker + more problematic front calipers. Stay away from 2000. I can't remember all the reasons, but it's a quirky year, from the many threads I've read.

I love a stick, but personally I'd do automatic with these trucks. My 545RFE has been flawless even now at 340K and it will be hard finding a stick anyway. Finding one with a tow package (that hasn't towed all it's life) would be another plus. Tow package comes with HD cooling for engine and trans. Good cooling = longer life. Find something that has had ATF fluid replacements. Stay away from trucks with glazed looking dipsticks. Dipsticks that get checked and wiped don't get glazed and crusty, meaning someone is keeping up with the oil level.

As for 4WD vs 2WD, the latter is less to break and simpler to maintain. If you don't have to deal with snow a lot, I'd go with the 2wd. Bring along a code reader. Gas the truck hard in place (owners won't like this). Lotsa smoke is not a good sign
I did the brake upgrade on my 2002 QC 4wd, I'd advise against the '02 or older and go with the '03/'04. The original brakes sucked and gave me some headaches. The upgrade to the 2003 durango fronts was straight forward and worth the effort on my part. I went with all JY parts (pads & rotors included) to get it all ironed out and now its good to go for a brake job when the time comes.
 
  #7  
Old 04-09-2023, 11:25 PM
magnethead's Avatar
magnethead
magnethead is offline
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 7,975
Received 161 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by steve05ram360
I did the brake upgrade on my 2002 QC 4wd, I'd advise against the '02 or older and go with the '03/'04. The original brakes sucked and gave me some headaches. The upgrade to the 2003 durango fronts was straight forward and worth the effort on my part. I went with all JY parts (pads & rotors included) to get it all ironed out and now its good to go for a brake job when the time comes.
I did the same. Took the wrenched and pickle fork with me, and brought home 2 fully loaded spindles and bolted them to my A-Arms.
 
The following users liked this post:
steve05ram360 (04-10-2023)



Quick Reply: First Time Buyer (2000-2004 Dakota)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:35 AM.