Shaking when stopped
#31
11-04-2011, 07:46 PM
#32
11-05-2011, 01:31 PM
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Washington State
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You might be right. I'm sitting in my Dodge Ram now and it's ideling at 600 RPM's. Oh and no shakes lol!
#33
11-05-2011, 04:19 PM
EDIT:I want to know if these aftermarket motor mounts are filled with hydraulic fluid like the factory ones supposedly are...
Last edited by darthroush; 11-05-2011 at 04:23 PM.
#34
11-07-2011, 10:16 PM
I have it exactly at 5.7 inch space at the top strut and it's still shaking. However the vibration at high speed has gone away. But the very annoying shaking while stopped is still there ! Gonna go out tomorrow and maybe adjust it more, but I'm getting sick of this. Had I known this I would have never bought this car, because one of my pet peeves is a smooth idle. I come from a Linclon Towncar ! LMFAO ! Anyway I'll let you know how it goes, but you are right at 750 it does not vibrate .
#35
11-08-2011, 10:38 PM
#36
11-09-2011, 12:37 PM
I think it's a design flaw, and someone should start a class action suit against Dodge. It's got me going nuts here, and I have to put it in neutral at every stop light what a pita. I did back off the motor mounts from the wheel well because it was shaking real bad, i mean real bad . I have the torque measured to exact 4.7 with all new mounts.
#37
11-09-2011, 05:22 PM
I PM'ed user DodgeCares on here, and he looked something up for me.
Do you have a Mopar part# by chance? Or how about a VIN? If you can provide me with either of these I can find the answer to your question.
Should be PN 05086709AA. Thanks!
Tyler,
The updated part# is 05086709AB and that is a fluid filled mount.
Now, here is the reply I received from Anchor, who I believe most of us get our replacement mounts from:
I guess the question now is, what's the deal? I'll be sending an e-mail back to Anchor with the part number to see what they say. I have a feeling I already know, but it couldn't hurt. I will also post this up as a sticky so everyone can take a look at it.
The answer seems it may be: we need an expensive factory mount.
Originally Posted by DodgeCares
Originally Posted by darthroush
Originally Posted by DodgeCares
Originally Posted by darthroush
Good afternoon,
I was wondering if it would possible to find out some information about a specific part. We in the Neon community have a very large problem with bad vibrations in these cars. The cars idle low to begin with, for some reason, but there is also a concern with the rear engine mount. I'm trying to figure out if the factory one is indeed a filled mount or not. The aftermarket mounts we commonly replace the factory one with are not filled, so that might shed some light on the issue. Would you happen to know who I might be able to get in contact with to find this out?
Thank you for your time,
Tyler
I was wondering if it would possible to find out some information about a specific part. We in the Neon community have a very large problem with bad vibrations in these cars. The cars idle low to begin with, for some reason, but there is also a concern with the rear engine mount. I'm trying to figure out if the factory one is indeed a filled mount or not. The aftermarket mounts we commonly replace the factory one with are not filled, so that might shed some light on the issue. Would you happen to know who I might be able to get in contact with to find this out?
Thank you for your time,
Tyler
The updated part# is 05086709AB and that is a fluid filled mount.
I received your inquiry this morning and your question about the 2947 being a filled mount. I guess you mean hydraulic fluid in the mount. Ours is not, nor was the original.
Regards,
John Leonard
Anchor Industries
Regards,
John Leonard
Anchor Industries
The answer seems it may be: we need an expensive factory mount.
#38
11-10-2011, 07:53 AM
I'm not putting another penny into this situation. I have paid 500 bucks and it's money down the drain it's still like it was with the original motor mounts. I hope people reading this will save their money until they figure out what the problem is. It might in fact be a flash ! Anyway please keep us updated and if a attorney is reading this I think we need to start a class action suit and at least be compensated for this fiasco .
#39
11-10-2011, 04:16 PM