2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.
Old Aug 7, 2015, 12:55 PM
How-Tos on this Topic
Last edit by: IB Advertising
See related guides and technical advice from our community experts:

Browse all: Engine
Print Wikipost

Kegger Intake Mod DIY

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 30, 2011 | 07:40 PM
  #241  
S S0DEN's Avatar
S S0DEN
Professional
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: Fort Carson, CO
Default

I think everyone understands that Heads (Valves,Cam) and manifolds are the restriction, but if you are removing the intake to repair the leak, why not cut the runners and polish it up?
 
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2011 | 10:52 PM
  #242  
15austin's Avatar
15austin
Amateur
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Default

Ok i may be beating a dead horse but i just read all 8 pages on the dyi section and just found this and its 25pages. All i want to know is- should i cut the runners and remove middle piece? I haul my 19 ft boat every other weekend and next year ill be haulin a 20ft rv. I dont race the ram in fact ive never put it to the floor before. So i dont daily drive it either. It was bought for lake, snow and truck purposes. Whats the advice. My aluminum plate is ordered, i can use a cutter well.
 
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2011 | 11:02 PM
  #243  
aim4squirrels's Avatar
aim4squirrels
Legend
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,843
Likes: 13
From: DFW, Texas
Default

I didn't notice any low end loas when I cut mine down, did notice a slight bump in power right around 2200-2500 RPMs and up, which is where you'll be on the highway if OD is off towing.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2011 | 12:58 AM
  #244  
biggreen2500's Avatar
biggreen2500
All Star
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 787
Likes: 1
From: bellingham wa
Default

Originally Posted by xskylinedx
Silver: I would like to find out someday if there is any noticable difference between the way you cut them and the way I did.

Before:


After 1" cut @ 45*



Any guesses?




so is this the right way to cut them all the way down for the 360s ? cause i got a 01 2500 4x4 with the 360
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2011 | 07:50 AM
  #245  
8uzzsaw's Avatar
8uzzsaw
Professional
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: NewBrunswick, Canada
Default

I'm planning on leaving in the center divider and cutting down the runners. Myself and another member have been tossing that idea around for a little while now and it seems like it would make more sense to do it that way. Plus if I am not happy with the divider in, I can remove it down the road. If funds/time/availability permits, I will get pre and post dyno's of the mod. Probably no real point in getting the dyno's done, because I will be doing new timing chain and gears, water pump, thermostat, kegger mod with ebay plenum plate. So My gains will most likely be from all of that.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2011 | 08:32 AM
  #246  
Bens5.9l4x4's Avatar
Bens5.9l4x4
Rookie
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: nashville,tn
Default

Ok I got a question now. Haha so why if the kegger mod makes it run better would dodge of wasted the time and money for the extra medal on the factory design in the first place? There has to be some GOOD reason on why it is the way it is. And the reason isn't just to **** us off either lol.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2011 | 08:52 AM
  #247  
8uzzsaw's Avatar
8uzzsaw
Professional
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: NewBrunswick, Canada
Default

We once thought the earth was flat...
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2011 | 09:13 AM
  #248  
Bens5.9l4x4's Avatar
Bens5.9l4x4
Rookie
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: nashville,tn
Default

Lmfao
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2011 | 09:21 AM
  #249  
8uzzsaw's Avatar
8uzzsaw
Professional
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: NewBrunswick, Canada
Default

Haha What I mean is that just because they built it that way once, it was a perfect flawless design that couldnt be made better.

I mean even toilet paper is still evolving right? If we can't get a**wipe perfected after a hundred years, how can we expect to get this right?
 

Last edited by 8uzzsaw; Oct 28, 2011 at 10:29 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2011 | 12:10 PM
  #250  
Gary-L's Avatar
Gary-L
Legend
Veteran: Navy
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,663
Likes: 8
From: Central Oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by Bens5.9l4x4
Ok I got a question now. Haha so why if the kegger mod makes it run better would dodge of wasted the time and money for the extra medal on the factory design in the first place? There has to be some GOOD reason on why it is the way it is. And the reason isn't just to **** us off either lol.

1) Go to school and learn proper spelling and grammar.
2) Vehicles built in a mass production capacity are built along the lines of a common denominator, meaning the Bean Counters are very stringent when it comes to cutting costs. If the cost of properly casting the intake to conform to the Kegger Mod is feasible, then the Bean Counters will sign off on it; otherwise, it is considered non-essential. All of the vehicle's operating parameters are designed and structured to an "average" driver. Why do you think it's possible for many tuning programs to unlock "hidden" torque from the transmissions? It's all done under the name of reducing costs and also meeting fuel efficiency guidelines.

Apparently, you lack a great deal of experience and understanding of how vehicles have been built for the past 100+ years, or for that matter anything built for pass production. No matter what, people are always tinkering with said item and improving on it in ways the designers never thought or were able to do.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:35 PM.