2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Turbo or Supercharged? 96 ram 5.2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 08:39 PM
  #1  
Chaddd07's Avatar
Chaddd07
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Rowlett, TX
Default Turbo or Supercharged? 96 ram 5.2

Alright....

So I am getting my motor and tranny rebuilt for around $5000 (aiming high) and when the truck is done, I wanted to put either a supercharger or a turbo in it. Right now, the truck has 256,000 miles on it and it still runs like a baby but if I put a turbo or supercharger...it will stress the engine. So I am trying to figure out what to put in it.

It is 2WD...so nothing else to do other than make it fast

Any suggestions or comments?

Chad.
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 08:48 PM
  #2  
PurplDodge's Avatar
PurplDodge
Legend
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,321
Likes: 12
From: Indiana
Default

What are you gonna build the engine to?

Personally, I'd go with the turbo. I like turbos.
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 08:48 PM
  #3  
Maxx_Magnum's Avatar
Maxx_Magnum
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 4
From: NB, Canada
Default

I'm not the best one to give you an educated answer, but if it were me, I'd SUPERCHARGE, turbos seem too ricey for me these days, unless it's on a big ol diesel of course
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 09:02 PM
  #4  
Chaddd07's Avatar
Chaddd07
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Rowlett, TX
Default

Originally Posted by PurplDodge
What are you gonna build the engine to?

Personally, I'd go with the turbo. I like turbos.

For right now, I just want to slowly put more stuff into it. I have been wanting to do this for a long time but just recently been able to afford everything. If I go with the turbo, I want to eventually get twin turbo...but I will need a tranny that will be able to support that...but I am not very educated with all that good stuff.
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 09:17 PM
  #5  
rumble_truck's Avatar
rumble_truck
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
From: St. Petersburg FL
Default

If it were me, and money wasn't an object, i'd go with a s/c. Instant torque rather than turbo lag, and the whine.. /drool
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 09:33 PM
  #6  
redheadhunter21's Avatar
redheadhunter21
Champion
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,831
Likes: 1
From: Miami, Fl
Default

I personally like superchargers but there expensive, and im not sure if anyone one is still making them for our trucks, but KRCperformance has both a single turbo and twin turbo kit for our trucks, there around 3k I think.
Heard mostly good things about them might want to call them up see what they say
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 09:43 PM
  #7  
PurplDodge's Avatar
PurplDodge
Legend
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,321
Likes: 12
From: Indiana
Default

Why is everyone doggin Turbochargers?
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 09:48 PM
  #8  
yakkier's Avatar
yakkier
Banned
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,667
Likes: 1
From: Burnsville, mn - Pensacola, fl
Default

You will get better performance from a supercharger, also you wont get any lag from a supercharger. Maybe more expensive but you will thank your self in the end, turbo's have alot of lag and alot of blow off and alot of time and money wasted.

Put the same car side by side, one with a supercharger one with a turbo and the supercharger would blow the turbo outta the water.
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 09:57 PM
  #9  
silver06cummins's Avatar
silver06cummins
Professional
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville Tn
Default

I beg to differ, It all depends on how your turbo is built
compressor housing, AR etc etc if its small enough it will spool quickly and no lag, but it also needs to be big enough to support what you trying to do with it.
I'm a drag racer (mustangs) and you wouldnt believe all the folks that have swapped from a SC to a turbo set-up. unless of course its a direct drive procharger/drool drool lol

Everyone will have a different opinion of the debate SC vs TC so dont take anything I say/type to heart or the wrong way for that matter, i'm only talking about my experience with it....
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 10:07 PM
  #10  
yakkier's Avatar
yakkier
Banned
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,667
Likes: 1
From: Burnsville, mn - Pensacola, fl
Default

I can agree to a certian extent but you have to realise that turbo's only run at higher RPM's, superchargers are belt driven an it is a continous power supply.

Turbo's are great for dragracing because you run 99% at full throttle so ofcourse you're going to see more power because it takes less to spool the turbo because they run on exhaust fumes.

there is no end to this debate it's been around as long as turbo's and superchargers have. I have had both superchargers and turbo's and personally i recommend superchargers to any one who ask's because 1 out of 10 people are on a drag strip, If you want instant power to the wheels at a redlight or just passing a car or towing, a supercharger is way more effective than a turbo.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:13 PM.