2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Edelbrock Intake Manifold

Old Aug 22, 2010 | 05:16 PM
  #1  
mfabris04's Avatar
mfabris04
Thread Starter
|
Amateur
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Bloomington, IN
Default Edelbrock Intake Manifold

I'm thinking about installing an Edelbrock Intake Manifold (7577) instead of doing the plenum fix, has anyone installed this intake manifold on their on ride? and if so what differences did you notice? Thanks
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2010 | 05:20 PM
  #2  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,550
Likes: 4,230
From: Clayton MI
Default

That is a four barrel manifold, with no provisions for the fuel injectors, you will either need to go carbed, which will be a real exercise, as you will need an ignition system as well.... or, have the manifold modified to accept the injector bungs. Not cheap.

Might be cheaper to go with the Dodge M1, or Hughes AirGap manifold.
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2010 | 05:25 PM
  #3  
bigslick050's Avatar
bigslick050
All Star
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 970
Likes: 0
From: Dacula GA
Default

I agree...go with the Hughes AirGap Manifold. Lots of fellas done this mod on here and give you help and advice about this specificly.
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2010 | 05:43 PM
  #4  
mfabris04's Avatar
mfabris04
Thread Starter
|
Amateur
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Bloomington, IN
Default

I knew there was a reason why it was alot cheaper. Thanks.
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 09:42 AM
  #5  
mfabris04's Avatar
mfabris04
Thread Starter
|
Amateur
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Bloomington, IN
Default

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/DCC-5007790/

Is this what you guys are talking about?
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 09:51 AM
  #6  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,550
Likes: 4,230
From: Clayton MI
Default

That's one of 'em. Yes. Keep in mind, that is a single plane manifold, and moves the power band further up the rpm range, you will lose a good bit of bottom end with that style of manifold.
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 09:48 PM
  #7  
dhvaughan's Avatar
dhvaughan
Hall Of Fame
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,204
Likes: 10
From: Gainesville, Ga.
Default

i didn't know you could get one that cheap.
so why do you lose bottom end ? you're talking about lower rpm torque? correct.

lol, i'm not sure i've got any to lose.
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 10:39 PM
  #8  
dodgeram07's Avatar
dodgeram07
Champion
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,363
Likes: 1
From: ohio
Default

here is the one you want
http://www.hughesengines.com/Index/p...p?partid=24773
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 10:43 PM
  #9  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,550
Likes: 4,230
From: Clayton MI
Default

Originally Posted by dhvaughan
i didn't know you could get one that cheap.
so why do you lose bottom end ? you're talking about lower rpm torque? correct.

lol, i'm not sure i've got any to lose.
Manifolds are designed with a specific application in mind. You can have bottom end torque, or, you can have upper RPM power, not both. (unless you use forced induction.) The manifold you linked is a single plane, designed for higher RPM, the Hughes unit is a dual plane, little more in line with what you have in mind for a truck.
 
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:54 PM.