2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Lift related talk

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 01-10-2012, 06:57 PM
Mutt Bryant's Avatar
Mutt Bryant
Mutt Bryant is offline
Professional
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Rural, Alabama
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ive heard bout the "bulldog stance". It's not that bad but it kinda kills visibility. The truck came stock with 2 blocks in the back. Would adding another one do any harm?
 
  #12  
Old 01-10-2012, 07:01 PM
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
HeyYou is offline
Administrator
Dodge Forum Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Clayton MI
Posts: 81,538
Likes: 0
Received 3,274 Likes on 3,021 Posts
Default

You already have two blocks in back? (as in, two on each side...) That shouldn't be like that if it's stock.
 
  #13  
Old 01-10-2012, 07:04 PM
Mutt Bryant's Avatar
Mutt Bryant
Mutt Bryant is offline
Professional
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Rural, Alabama
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yep. I think is one 3" lift block and 1 seating block ( 1" inch tall at most). That's on each side. The front is quite stock as far as I can tell.
 
  #14  
Old 01-10-2012, 07:38 PM
BackwoodsRam's Avatar
BackwoodsRam
BackwoodsRam is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

as far as mpgs i run 37's and get about 9.5 mpgs. that also with a slightly numericall higher gear ratio than you at 3.93
 
  #15  
Old 01-10-2012, 07:57 PM
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
HeyYou is offline
Administrator
Dodge Forum Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Clayton MI
Posts: 81,538
Likes: 0
Received 3,274 Likes on 3,021 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mutt Bryant
Yep. I think is one 3" lift block and 1 seating block ( 1" inch tall at most). That's on each side. The front is quite stock as far as I can tell.
I'd have to go look at mine... but, I think the stock block is supposed to be like five inches, and there is only one...... Will look tomorrow.
 
  #16  
Old 01-10-2012, 08:04 PM
Mutt Bryant's Avatar
Mutt Bryant
Mutt Bryant is offline
Professional
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Rural, Alabama
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BackwoodsRam
as far as mpgs i run 37's and get about 9.5 mpgs. that also with a slightly numericall higher gear ratio than you at 3.93
So if I decided to slap on 35-37 tires with 4.88's, then my gas milage shouldn't be altered very much by the tires themselves. Am I right?
 
  #17  
Old 01-10-2012, 08:08 PM
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
HeyYou is offline
Administrator
Dodge Forum Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Clayton MI
Posts: 81,538
Likes: 0
Received 3,274 Likes on 3,021 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mutt Bryant
So if I decided to slap on 35-37 tires with 4.88's, then my gas milage shouldn't be altered very much by the tires themselves. Am I right?
It will suffer less with good gears, than it would without 'em. Bigger tires are heavier.... if you went with the 35's, and 4.88s, you might actually get BETTER gas mileage around town, but, would suffer on the freeway. 4.56 and 35's would keep rpm right around where they are stock, and you would prolly drop a point or so on gas mileage. 33's and 4.10s would be pretty similar.
 
  #18  
Old 01-10-2012, 08:12 PM
BackwoodsRam's Avatar
BackwoodsRam
BackwoodsRam is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mutt Bryant
So if I decided to slap on 35-37 tires with 4.88's, then my gas milage shouldn't be altered very much by the tires themselves. Am I right?
4.88's are better match for 37's or 38's. and like HeyYou said it wont suffer as much as mine has, but it will still suffer. 37+ inch tires are very, very heavy(my rims and tires weigh about 150lbs or so on each corner, and your motor still has to turn those heavy SOB's(albeit will take slightly less effort)
 
  #19  
Old 01-10-2012, 08:41 PM
Mutt Bryant's Avatar
Mutt Bryant
Mutt Bryant is offline
Professional
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Rural, Alabama
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So 4.56 or 4.10 gears are better suited for the 35's? My usual driving consist of around town driving and some times a 10 mile trip up the highway (55-65 mph tops) to the larger town for some things (walmart, autoparts, etc)
 
  #20  
Old 01-10-2012, 09:09 PM
kejobe's Avatar
kejobe
kejobe is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,241
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mutt Bryant
So 4.56 or 4.10 gears are better suited for the 35's? My usual driving consist of around town driving and some times a 10 mile trip up the highway (55-65 mph tops) to the larger town for some things (walmart, autoparts, etc)
I would go with the 4.56's. I do mostly country/city driving, 55mph speed limit and less, but do have to highway travel at times, sometimes up to 5-600 miles maybe 1-2 times a year. But do hit the highway at least once a week for 50 miles or so. I plan (when money permits) on going with 4.56's and 33's.

I looked at doing 4.10's but with all the towing and hauling I do, I felt the 4.56's are better siuted.
 


Quick Reply: Lift related talk



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:07 AM.