2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Lift related talk

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 06:57 PM
  #11  
Mutt Bryant's Avatar
Mutt Bryant
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: Rural, Alabama
Default

Ive heard bout the "bulldog stance". It's not that bad but it kinda kills visibility. The truck came stock with 2 blocks in the back. Would adding another one do any harm?
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 07:01 PM
  #12  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,479
Likes: 4,223
From: Clayton MI
Default

You already have two blocks in back? (as in, two on each side...) That shouldn't be like that if it's stock.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 07:04 PM
  #13  
Mutt Bryant's Avatar
Mutt Bryant
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: Rural, Alabama
Default

Yep. I think is one 3" lift block and 1 seating block ( 1" inch tall at most). That's on each side. The front is quite stock as far as I can tell.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 07:38 PM
  #14  
BackwoodsRam's Avatar
BackwoodsRam
Record Breaker
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Default

as far as mpgs i run 37's and get about 9.5 mpgs. that also with a slightly numericall higher gear ratio than you at 3.93
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 07:57 PM
  #15  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,479
Likes: 4,223
From: Clayton MI
Default

Originally Posted by Mutt Bryant
Yep. I think is one 3" lift block and 1 seating block ( 1" inch tall at most). That's on each side. The front is quite stock as far as I can tell.
I'd have to go look at mine... but, I think the stock block is supposed to be like five inches, and there is only one...... Will look tomorrow.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 08:04 PM
  #16  
Mutt Bryant's Avatar
Mutt Bryant
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: Rural, Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by BackwoodsRam
as far as mpgs i run 37's and get about 9.5 mpgs. that also with a slightly numericall higher gear ratio than you at 3.93
So if I decided to slap on 35-37 tires with 4.88's, then my gas milage shouldn't be altered very much by the tires themselves. Am I right?
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 08:08 PM
  #17  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,479
Likes: 4,223
From: Clayton MI
Default

Originally Posted by Mutt Bryant
So if I decided to slap on 35-37 tires with 4.88's, then my gas milage shouldn't be altered very much by the tires themselves. Am I right?
It will suffer less with good gears, than it would without 'em. Bigger tires are heavier.... if you went with the 35's, and 4.88s, you might actually get BETTER gas mileage around town, but, would suffer on the freeway. 4.56 and 35's would keep rpm right around where they are stock, and you would prolly drop a point or so on gas mileage. 33's and 4.10s would be pretty similar.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 08:12 PM
  #18  
BackwoodsRam's Avatar
BackwoodsRam
Record Breaker
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Default

Originally Posted by Mutt Bryant
So if I decided to slap on 35-37 tires with 4.88's, then my gas milage shouldn't be altered very much by the tires themselves. Am I right?
4.88's are better match for 37's or 38's. and like HeyYou said it wont suffer as much as mine has, but it will still suffer. 37+ inch tires are very, very heavy(my rims and tires weigh about 150lbs or so on each corner, and your motor still has to turn those heavy SOB's(albeit will take slightly less effort)
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 08:41 PM
  #19  
Mutt Bryant's Avatar
Mutt Bryant
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: Rural, Alabama
Default

So 4.56 or 4.10 gears are better suited for the 35's? My usual driving consist of around town driving and some times a 10 mile trip up the highway (55-65 mph tops) to the larger town for some things (walmart, autoparts, etc)
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 09:09 PM
  #20  
kejobe's Avatar
kejobe
Record Breaker
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,241
Likes: 12
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by Mutt Bryant
So 4.56 or 4.10 gears are better suited for the 35's? My usual driving consist of around town driving and some times a 10 mile trip up the highway (55-65 mph tops) to the larger town for some things (walmart, autoparts, etc)
I would go with the 4.56's. I do mostly country/city driving, 55mph speed limit and less, but do have to highway travel at times, sometimes up to 5-600 miles maybe 1-2 times a year. But do hit the highway at least once a week for 50 miles or so. I plan (when money permits) on going with 4.56's and 33's.

I looked at doing 4.10's but with all the towing and hauling I do, I felt the 4.56's are better siuted.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:21 PM.