2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

5.2L Ram Motor In Dakota?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 04-09-2012, 01:08 PM
pinkfloydeffect's Avatar
pinkfloydeffect
pinkfloydeffect is offline
All Star
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: ☮ Earth ☮
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HeyYou
In 98, the instrument cluster changed, and also how the PCM communicated with it, Dodge introduced the "Central Timer Module".... basically, you have a little network in your truck, and the CTM is the 'hub'. Earlier models don't have that... which makes them MUCH easier to retrofit.
+REP man this is some great stuff to know!

Are we sure there were no half-years for this CTM? I'm still shocked they did their math correctly (or took a loss) during the OBDII upgrade on January 1st 1996...

To summarize:
1995- OBD1
1996- OBD2
1997- OBD2 + more control over engine performance
1998- OBD2 + more control over engine performance & CTF network
 

Last edited by pinkfloydeffect; 04-09-2012 at 01:11 PM.
  #32  
Old 04-09-2012, 01:11 PM
Wombat Ranger's Avatar
Wombat Ranger
Wombat Ranger is offline
Grand Champion
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Wild West
Posts: 5,672
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

The '96 model years started in '95 anyway... If they are out there, no ones ever talked about them here in all my ridiculous amount of searching.
 
  #33  
Old 04-09-2012, 01:14 PM
pinkfloydeffect's Avatar
pinkfloydeffect
pinkfloydeffect is offline
All Star
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: ☮ Earth ☮
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2x1972
The '96 model years started in '95 anyway... If they are out there, no ones ever talked about them here in all my ridiculous amount of searching.
I need someone to post a picture of their OBDII plug and also what to look for (#s etc.) to know if it has the CTM network or not.
 

Last edited by pinkfloydeffect; 04-09-2012 at 07:50 PM.
  #34  
Old 04-09-2012, 01:29 PM
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
HeyYou is online now
Administrator
Dodge Forum Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Clayton MI
Posts: 81,532
Likes: 0
Received 3,273 Likes on 3,020 Posts
Default

CTM may have started in 98.5.... but, I am not 100% sure on that. 96 and 97 trucks won't have it. Basically, if it has the digital odometer, it's gonna be complicated. Mechanical odometer, and you should be golden.
 
  #35  
Old 04-09-2012, 08:03 PM
pinkfloydeffect's Avatar
pinkfloydeffect
pinkfloydeffect is offline
All Star
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: ☮ Earth ☮
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Good call; if I find a 98' I will check for a mechanical odometer!

If it comes down to a 95.5 I will check for OBDII, assuming the following information below is correct for Dakotas:

OBD1


OBD2:



Here is a sketch of my concept truck:
http://youtu.be/nC2Vahxg9Pc?hd=1
 
  #36  
Old 04-09-2012, 08:26 PM
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
HeyYou is online now
Administrator
Dodge Forum Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Clayton MI
Posts: 81,532
Likes: 0
Received 3,273 Likes on 3,020 Posts
Default

The shape is all you need to look at. Not every connector will have the same pinout... not even on the same vehicle line. Squareish is OBDI, rounded is OBDII.
 
  #37  
Old 07-31-2012, 05:14 PM
Derek R. Tracey's Avatar
Derek R. Tracey
Derek R. Tracey is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Potential correction

Originally Posted by HeyYou
CTM may have started in 98.5.... but, I am not 100% sure on that. 96 and 97 trucks won't have it. Basically, if it has the digital odometer, it's gonna be complicated. Mechanical odometer, and you should be golden.
I own a '97 Dakota with a 5.2L Automatic. Build date is 04/15/97. It has the digital odometer. I new someone that replaced his '97 PCM with a '96 PCM, he gained horsepower and torque, but the Dash Cluster was inoperable.

Now that I am in a position to do some performance upgrades to my Dak, I'm not really sure what and where I can go to do What I would like to do, maybe more HP Torque, upgrade Trans and Rear axle.

Any ideas would be great, truck has 140k on it. ( purchased new with 147 miles, I am only owner )

Please email me derekrtracey@yahoo.com for help.

Thanks.
 
  #38  
Old 07-31-2012, 05:37 PM
pinkfloydeffect's Avatar
pinkfloydeffect
pinkfloydeffect is offline
All Star
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: ☮ Earth ☮
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Derek R. Tracey
I own a '97 Dakota with a 5.2L Automatic. Build date is 04/15/97. It has the digital odometer. I new someone that replaced his '97 PCM with a '96 PCM, he gained horsepower and torque, but the Dash Cluster was inoperable.

Now that I am in a position to do some performance upgrades to my Dak, I'm not really sure what and where I can go to do What I would like to do, maybe more HP Torque, upgrade Trans and Rear axle.

Any ideas would be great, truck has 140k on it. ( purchased new with 147 miles, I am only owner )

Please email me derekrtracey@yahoo.com for help.

Thanks.
Try starting your own thread...
 
  #39  
Old 08-01-2012, 09:35 AM
Derek R. Tracey's Avatar
Derek R. Tracey
Derek R. Tracey is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

sorry about that, i kind of ran two posts together. the initial reply was to help someone else with their question.
 
  #40  
Old 09-06-2012, 10:56 PM
pinkfloydeffect's Avatar
pinkfloydeffect
pinkfloydeffect is offline
All Star
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: ☮ Earth ☮
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Lightbulb

So much for the title...but now I'm really thinking if I'm going to do this I might as well make it a 360. Gas was a factor but if I was light footed I don't think there is much of a difference at all between a 318 and 360....it's probably just when stepped on or driven over 60mph?

If I kept all the regular 318 swap items in mind, what else am I branching into here? It's the same from the intake up correct? I can still use a 318 PCM/intake/everything? Block still bolts up like a 318? NV-3500 will fit with a 3.9/5.2 bell housing?
 


Quick Reply: 5.2L Ram Motor In Dakota?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:19 AM.