2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

1998 4bt Cummins Swap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 15, 2012 | 11:51 AM
  #71  
DWick30's Avatar
DWick30
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Default

Do you think that there is any way that this swap would work in a 2nd gen Dakota?
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2012 | 12:03 PM
  #72  
aofarrell2's Avatar
aofarrell2
Champion
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,096
Likes: 2
From: Iowa
Default

IDK if there would be enough room as factory... I know of a project that put the Cummins in a Dakota.. Ill see if I can dig up the link later.. They had to really mod it tho.
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2012 | 12:27 PM
  #73  
stewie01's Avatar
stewie01
Legend
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,914
Likes: 4
From: Fredericksburg, Virginia
Default

Any updates Moochoff?
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2012 | 08:03 AM
  #74  
Moochoff's Avatar
Moochoff
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 293
Likes: 1
From: Spirit Lake, IA
Default

Sorry for neglecting the forum guys!!! I just had a dispute with USPS for 19 days over my engine mounts!! Arrgghhh...

Finally got them in the truck and tach welded it with the motor in. Ill pull the motor again today to add gussets and weld her in like its supposed to. Im using the block mounts that came with the liquid mounts. Im only fabbing the receiving(frame) end, which is almost too simple
Name:  photo-47.jpg
Views: 543
Size:  124.2 KB
Dakota and jeep swaps are actually more popular than 1500 swaps..
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2012 | 08:43 AM
  #75  
h3lzsn1p3r's Avatar
h3lzsn1p3r
Captain
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
From: Eganville. On
Default

the 4 bt fits in a ranger and dakota simple
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2012 | 10:08 AM
  #76  
aofarrell2's Avatar
aofarrell2
Champion
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,096
Likes: 2
From: Iowa
Default

So Moochoff, what is the size of that engine?
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2012 | 10:17 AM
  #77  
crazzywolfie's Avatar
crazzywolfie
Legend
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,025
Likes: 72
From: orangeville ontario
Default

how do you want to size? i am pretty sure it should be a 3.9L or 239
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2012 | 10:21 AM
  #78  
aofarrell2's Avatar
aofarrell2
Champion
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,096
Likes: 2
From: Iowa
Default

3.9L? That's what I wanted to know. Wonder why one wouldn't put the big 5.9L in... But then again if you aren't doing much towing it should be awesome... Probably will have some great fuel mileage.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2012 | 08:45 PM
  #79  
Wombat Ranger's Avatar
Wombat Ranger
Grand Champion
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 5,672
Likes: 4
From: Wild West
Default

Originally Posted by techningeer
3.9L? That's what I wanted to know. Wonder why one wouldn't put the big 5.9L in... But then again if you aren't doing much towing it should be awesome... Probably will have some great fuel mileage.
^^ Better fuel economy yes, but also 350 lbs lighter, not much more than the original small block.
 
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2012 | 02:56 PM
  #80  
aofarrell2's Avatar
aofarrell2
Champion
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,096
Likes: 2
From: Iowa
Default

Ahh 350 lbs.. Wow! moochoff let us know what your fuel mileage is! Also, is it a turbo?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:57 PM.