2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

IAT Sensor ?.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 5, 2013 | 03:30 AM
  #1  
Ram Driver's Avatar
Ram Driver
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 475
Likes: 1
From: Idaho
Default IAT Sensor ?.

Ive read were some here and on other forums have moved the IAT sensor from the intake manifold to the tube of there cold air intake. Are there any gains to be had by doing this ?.

Ive owned other vehicles in the past were the IAT sensor was between the throttle body and the air filter housing, and that would seem like the better place for it to be to read the colder air coming into the engine.
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2013 | 10:18 AM
  #2  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,383
Likes: 4,210
From: Clayton MI
Default

Doesn't really matter where you put it. The engine will adjust mixture by seeing what the O2 sensor has to say in any event. IAT plays more of a role in open loop operation. (cold engine, or large throttle openings) Having it someplace other than the stock location will have you running a bit richer, that's about the only difference.
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2013 | 03:11 PM
  #3  
Ram Driver's Avatar
Ram Driver
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 475
Likes: 1
From: Idaho
Default

Originally Posted by HeyYou
Doesn't really matter where you put it. The engine will adjust mixture by seeing what the O2 sensor has to say in any event. IAT plays more of a role in open loop operation. (cold engine, or large throttle openings) Having it someplace other than the stock location will have you running a bit richer, that's about the only difference.
If your running a bit richer, wouldn`t that give you a little more power even thought it may be a very small gain ?.
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2013 | 03:49 PM
  #4  
jkeaton's Avatar
jkeaton
DF Admin
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 28,195
Likes: 362
From: Winston Salem, NC
Default

Those "+100 hp chips" on ebay operate off the same principal. It's nothing but a resistor yuo tap into the IAT wiring to trick the computer into thinking it is cold so it richens up the mixture a bit. The gains are hardly noticeable. I actually made one for my Dakota. I could not tell a difference in any sort of power gains, but my mileage did go down like 1 mpg or so.
 
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2013 | 10:26 AM
  #5  
Spillage's Avatar
Spillage
Record Breaker
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,437
Likes: 73
From: S. Florida
Default

I moved the IAT sensor from the keg to the inlet tube (K&N) about a month before fitting an FI-Airgap, so I could see the effect of moving the sensor.
The new location is ~6" before the TB, and did not require extending the sensor cable.
The air temperature is ~50°F cooler in this location.
I saw no change in performance or MPG.
 
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2013 | 01:37 PM
  #6  
Ram Driver's Avatar
Ram Driver
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 475
Likes: 1
From: Idaho
Default

Originally Posted by jkeaton
Those "+100 hp chips" on ebay operate off the same principal. It's nothing but a resistor yuo tap into the IAT wiring to trick the computer into thinking it is cold so it richens up the mixture a bit. The gains are hardly noticeable. I actually made one for my Dakota. I could not tell a difference in any sort of power gains, but my mileage did go down like 1 mpg or so.
I know those chips on ebay are junk and don`t do anything. I would never waste my money on them.
 
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2013 | 01:44 PM
  #7  
Ram Driver's Avatar
Ram Driver
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 475
Likes: 1
From: Idaho
Default

Originally Posted by Spillage
I moved the IAT sensor from the keg to the inlet tube (K&N) about a month before fitting an FI-Airgap, so I could see the effect of moving the sensor.
The new location is ~6" before the TB, and did not require extending the sensor cable.
The air temperature is ~50°F cooler in this location.
I saw no change in performance or MPG.
This is the kind of information I was looking for, wondering if there were any gains to be had if the IAT was moved to a location were it got colder air flow.
 
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2013 | 03:31 PM
  #8  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,383
Likes: 4,210
From: Clayton MI
Default

It would run richer in open loop. If there was any gain to be had there, you wouldn't notice it.
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2013 | 12:01 PM
  #9  
CSDavies26's Avatar
CSDavies26
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 487
Likes: 1
From: Evans City, PA
Default

Originally Posted by Spillage
I moved the IAT sensor from the keg to the inlet tube (K&N) about a month before fitting an FI-Airgap, so I could see the effect of moving the sensor.
The new location is ~6" before the TB, and did not require extending the sensor cable.
The air temperature is ~50°F cooler in this location.
I saw no change in performance or MPG.
+1, I did the exact same thing last month.
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2013 | 03:04 PM
  #10  
jkeaton's Avatar
jkeaton
DF Admin
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 28,195
Likes: 362
From: Winston Salem, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Ram Driver
I know those chips on ebay are junk and don`t do anything. I would never waste my money on them.
Guess what I was trying to say unsucessfully was relocating the IAT so it "sees" cooler air is the same concept of those chips.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:47 PM.