2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

boosted 360 questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 06-28-2014, 04:03 PM
Wildman4x4nut's Avatar
Wildman4x4nut
Wildman4x4nut is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Cle Elum, WA
Posts: 1,886
Received 158 Likes on 120 Posts
Default

If you want to build a true boosted engine you should be running 8 to1 pistons or close to that. The higher your compression level the better your timing had better be and the higher octane level you'll need for fuel. If you're building the engine and are going to add boost then contact one of the supercharger companies and ask them what they recommend for the engine. Ask about compression ratio and cam spec's. They can tell you what they feel is required. Also look up a company called Split Second as they have stuff to help with your tuning.

OOPS forgot to add something.

The lower your compression ratio is the more boost you can run. So at 9-9.5 to 1 you might only be able to get away with 5-7 pounds of boost. But if you drop the compression ratio to 8 to 1 then you can get away with 14-18 pounds of boost. Something to think about.
 

Last edited by Wildman4x4nut; 06-28-2014 at 04:08 PM.
  #12  
Old 06-28-2014, 08:02 PM
Hahns5.2's Avatar
Hahns5.2
Hahns5.2 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Battle Ground WA
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

10:1 is probably okay properly tuned with the right cam. I've ran 12PSI at stock compression for a long time. As far as carbs, you're on your own there.
 
  #13  
Old 06-28-2014, 10:22 PM
Blue Mopar01's Avatar
Blue Mopar01
Blue Mopar01 is offline
All Star
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So running a mildly built engine, like mine, could be ok running a super or pro charger? In the future id like to add one and I'm trying to get info on this subject as well.
 
  #14  
Old 06-28-2014, 10:24 PM
Ham Bone's Avatar
Ham Bone
Ham Bone is offline
Champion
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 4,072
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

stock compressions is kinda low really. 9.1:1
 
  #15  
Old 06-29-2014, 12:50 AM
Blue Mopar01's Avatar
Blue Mopar01
Blue Mopar01 is offline
All Star
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

We'll going off wildman's post, lower compression= higher boost if I comprehend that right...sorry I'm not trying to thread jack here. I'd just like a bit more power down the road and figured forced induction would be easier than a stroker.
 
  #16  
Old 06-29-2014, 11:00 AM
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
HeyYou is offline
Administrator
Dodge Forum Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Clayton MI
Posts: 82,533
Likes: 0
Received 3,391 Likes on 3,131 Posts
Default

Nothing can compare to the power boost of forced induction. Of course, it ain't cheap either. Used to be a selection of bolt-on kits for our trucks, but, not so much anymore. They can occasionally be found on the used market, but, don't expect anything new. (new they ran around 3K, and up......)

Trick is, to balance compression ratio, and boost level. Which way builds more power (low compression/high boost vs high compression/low boost.) I don't know....... I think low compression, with moderate boost would be more reliable though, and still give you some serious power.
 
  #17  
Old 07-01-2014, 08:10 AM
Blue Mopar01's Avatar
Blue Mopar01
Blue Mopar01 is offline
All Star
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hmm alright, thanks for the info. I'll have to research some more too.
 



Quick Reply: boosted 360 questions



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:31 AM.