2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

boosted 360 questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 28, 2014 | 04:03 PM
  #11  
Wildman4x4nut's Avatar
Wildman4x4nut
Record Breaker
Veteran: Army
10 Year Member
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 162
From: Cle Elum, WA
Default

If you want to build a true boosted engine you should be running 8 to1 pistons or close to that. The higher your compression level the better your timing had better be and the higher octane level you'll need for fuel. If you're building the engine and are going to add boost then contact one of the supercharger companies and ask them what they recommend for the engine. Ask about compression ratio and cam spec's. They can tell you what they feel is required. Also look up a company called Split Second as they have stuff to help with your tuning.

OOPS forgot to add something.

The lower your compression ratio is the more boost you can run. So at 9-9.5 to 1 you might only be able to get away with 5-7 pounds of boost. But if you drop the compression ratio to 8 to 1 then you can get away with 14-18 pounds of boost. Something to think about.
 

Last edited by Wildman4x4nut; Jun 28, 2014 at 04:08 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2014 | 08:02 PM
  #12  
Hahns5.2's Avatar
Hahns5.2
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 3
From: Battle Ground WA
Default

10:1 is probably okay properly tuned with the right cam. I've ran 12PSI at stock compression for a long time. As far as carbs, you're on your own there.
 
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2014 | 10:22 PM
  #13  
Blue Mopar01's Avatar
Blue Mopar01
All Star
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: North Dakota
Default

So running a mildly built engine, like mine, could be ok running a super or pro charger? In the future id like to add one and I'm trying to get info on this subject as well.
 
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2014 | 10:24 PM
  #14  
Ham Bone's Avatar
Ham Bone
Champion
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,072
Likes: 7
From: Blacksburg, VA
Default

stock compressions is kinda low really. 9.1:1
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2014 | 12:50 AM
  #15  
Blue Mopar01's Avatar
Blue Mopar01
All Star
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: North Dakota
Default

We'll going off wildman's post, lower compression= higher boost if I comprehend that right...sorry I'm not trying to thread jack here. I'd just like a bit more power down the road and figured forced induction would be easier than a stroker.
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2014 | 11:00 AM
  #16  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,403
Likes: 4,214
From: Clayton MI
Default

Nothing can compare to the power boost of forced induction. Of course, it ain't cheap either. Used to be a selection of bolt-on kits for our trucks, but, not so much anymore. They can occasionally be found on the used market, but, don't expect anything new. (new they ran around 3K, and up......)

Trick is, to balance compression ratio, and boost level. Which way builds more power (low compression/high boost vs high compression/low boost.) I don't know....... I think low compression, with moderate boost would be more reliable though, and still give you some serious power.
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 08:10 AM
  #17  
Blue Mopar01's Avatar
Blue Mopar01
All Star
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: North Dakota
Default

Hmm alright, thanks for the info. I'll have to research some more too.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:50 PM.