Can someone explain to me the huge HP difference between stock 360 and crate 360?
What gives? How come we see rams dyno at like 180hp at the wheels (so like 230 at the crank), and no one can seem to pull any power out of them without stroker kits or forced induction (meaning 50+ horsepower) but yet Mopar sold crate engine 360s rated at 300hp with a completely stock production bottom end and cam, with the only functional differences being a carb intake/carb.
Then, the HotRod guys can bolt on a conventional distributor, msd ignition, new carb, and long tubes and get one to put down 319 horse at 4400 and 425 lb-ft at 3700. That's with the stock bottom end! Are we to believe that the addition of multi-port fuel injection kills nearly 100 horsepower and torque?
I understand that they aren't running all the drive accessories and that the stock tune on the injected motor isn't as performance oriented, but if that were the issue, a custom tune, long tubes, and a better ignition should match or exceed the 319/425 figure(at the crank anyway)...but I haven't seen that on the forums. You only see guys getting those numbers out of strokers or at least with a big cam. On stock displacement motors with stock camshafts, guys report essentially no difference with headers(Steve Dulcich confirmed this on engine masters or hot rod garage), maybe 10 horsepower with a tune, and nothing with ignition. Furthermore, the addition of an M1 or Hughes Intake doesn't appear to make up the difference either(30 horse maybe?), but rather add some power and shift the operating range up the band.
This just seems like a common theme to me. If you watch the shows or read the mags, the guys grab an injected motor, swap the intake, put a carb on it(they do it for convenience, not power), and pick up 50 horsepower instantly. Yet guys on forums who have the injection still in place, have them custom tuned and don't see near those gains. I just don't get it.
Then, the HotRod guys can bolt on a conventional distributor, msd ignition, new carb, and long tubes and get one to put down 319 horse at 4400 and 425 lb-ft at 3700. That's with the stock bottom end! Are we to believe that the addition of multi-port fuel injection kills nearly 100 horsepower and torque?
I understand that they aren't running all the drive accessories and that the stock tune on the injected motor isn't as performance oriented, but if that were the issue, a custom tune, long tubes, and a better ignition should match or exceed the 319/425 figure(at the crank anyway)...but I haven't seen that on the forums. You only see guys getting those numbers out of strokers or at least with a big cam. On stock displacement motors with stock camshafts, guys report essentially no difference with headers(Steve Dulcich confirmed this on engine masters or hot rod garage), maybe 10 horsepower with a tune, and nothing with ignition. Furthermore, the addition of an M1 or Hughes Intake doesn't appear to make up the difference either(30 horse maybe?), but rather add some power and shift the operating range up the band.
This just seems like a common theme to me. If you watch the shows or read the mags, the guys grab an injected motor, swap the intake, put a carb on it(they do it for convenience, not power), and pick up 50 horsepower instantly. Yet guys on forums who have the injection still in place, have them custom tuned and don't see near those gains. I just don't get it.
Last edited by Skeptic68W; Oct 5, 2017 at 01:23 PM.
Links to the engines in question?
Last edited by HeyYou; Oct 5, 2017 at 09:15 PM. Reason: Edited the wrong post. oops.
So where are they claiming the additional 60 horsepower is coming from? Or are they simply overrating the engine? (no one would ever do that......)
Links to the engines in question?
Links to the engines in question?
Last edited by HeyYou; Oct 5, 2017 at 09:15 PM.
You can get a power increase like that with a set of good heads
Post #19 for the dyno sheet
https://dodgeforum.com/forum/2nd-gen...installed.html
Post #19 for the dyno sheet
https://dodgeforum.com/forum/2nd-gen...installed.html
You can get a power increase like that with a set of good heads
Post #19 for the dyno sheet
https://dodgeforum.com/forum/2nd-gen...installed.html
Post #19 for the dyno sheet
https://dodgeforum.com/forum/2nd-gen...installed.html
Last edited by adukart; Oct 6, 2017 at 12:14 AM.
Really the stock 5.7 that replaced the 5.9 didn't really have much more cam, just heads and an intake that flow ridiculously well.
Links to the engines in question?
Trending Topics
You can get a power increase like that with a set of good heads
Post #19 for the dyno sheet
https://dodgeforum.com/forum/2nd-gen...installed.html
Post #19 for the dyno sheet
https://dodgeforum.com/forum/2nd-gen...installed.html
Sheriff beat me too it. Way better flowing heads and intake.Those alone can make up for an asthmatic cam, or at least help. Really the stock 5.7 that replaced the 5.9 didn't really have much more cam, just heads and an intake that flow ridiculously well. A mild towing type 5.9 cam has more lift and duration than a 5.7 hemi but it isn't putting down more "power" than the 5.7 probably more torque though.
Haha you find me his email and I'll get right on that.
I'm not about to submit a question on their facebook page and then watch 500 Q & A sessions hoping they will answer it.
I'm not about to submit a question on their facebook page and then watch 500 Q & A sessions hoping they will answer it.













