2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

3.9l V6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-10-2019, 04:16 AM
MoparFanatic21's Avatar
MoparFanatic21
MoparFanatic21 is offline
Legend
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 8,035
Received 307 Likes on 299 Posts
Default 3.9l V6

Anybody have any experience with them? Im going to look at a 2002 Dakota with that engine for my pap and washer to make sure it's a good motor. I always stayed away from V6s as they are known to be weak compared to V8s. The four said the only known is it will shut off sometimes but will start right back up. My dad's 06 Ram does that, so any suggestions there? I talked the guy down from $1500 to $500.
Thanks guys
Also he's coming over from FORD lol
 
  #2  
Old 03-10-2019, 08:53 AM
rebeltaz83's Avatar
rebeltaz83
rebeltaz83 is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: at home
Posts: 494
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Just in a Dakota. They are weak, don't really save on gas from the v8s. I averaged 15 highway and City it didn't matter. Good for a daily if you don't haul/tow allot. I pulled a goldwing on a 6'x12' trailer the truck knew it was back there, it was pathetic lol. But it got the truck itself around pretty good, never had any trouble, just a water pump after 110,000 miles.
 
  #3  
Old 03-10-2019, 11:46 AM
MoparFanatic21's Avatar
MoparFanatic21
MoparFanatic21 is offline
Legend
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 8,035
Received 307 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rebeltaz83
Just in a Dakota. They are weak, don't really save on gas from the v8s. I averaged 15 highway and City it didn't matter. Good for a daily if you don't haul/tow allot. I pulled a goldwing on a 6'x12' trailer the truck knew it was back there, it was pathetic lol. But it got the truck itself around pretty good, never had any trouble, just a water pump after 110,000 miles.
Goog to know! He won't be towing at all, he maybe hauling some house stuff (boxes, tables, etc).
 
  #4  
Old 03-13-2019, 10:28 AM
Bumblet00th's Avatar
Bumblet00th
Bumblet00th is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They aren't bad, they're just as reliable as their 5.2 counterparts, mine currently has the 3.9 and she's trooped along since December 2000. All thats been changed heavy maintainence wise is a water pump. They endure a lot and are pretty strong, but they lack the power v8s do. Only reason I'd see using a v6 is if you were to doing light duty work like hauling garbage or lumber or such. As much flak as they get they aren't that bad of a motor
 
  #5  
Old 03-13-2019, 02:41 PM
MoparFanatic21's Avatar
MoparFanatic21
MoparFanatic21 is offline
Legend
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 8,035
Received 307 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bumblet00th
They aren't bad, they're just as reliable as their 5.2 counterparts, mine currently has the 3.9 and she's trooped along since December 2000. All thats been changed heavy maintainence wise is a water pump. They endure a lot and are pretty strong, but they lack the power v8s do. Only reason I'd see using a v6 is if you were to doing light duty work like hauling garbage or lumber or such. As much flak as they get they aren't that bad of a motor
He won't be doing heavy hauling or towing so he should be fine
 
  #6  
Old 03-13-2019, 03:18 PM
00t444e's Avatar
00t444e
00t444e is offline
Captain
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Southern OH
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

They run good and are reliable but they don't have much power, even with a 5 speed my 3.9 feels slow. I had a Ford Ranger automatic with the 4.0 V6 and it would run circles around this 3.9. I plan on putting a V8 in it soon.
 
  #7  
Old 03-13-2019, 03:44 PM
MoparFanatic21's Avatar
MoparFanatic21
MoparFanatic21 is offline
Legend
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 8,035
Received 307 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 00t444e
They run good and are reliable but they don't have much power, even with a 5 speed my 3.9 feels slow. I had a Ford Ranger automatic with the 4.0 V6 and it would run circles around this 3.9. I plan on putting a V8 in it soon.
He wanted a v6 truck so I figured a little Dakota would give him a little bit better gas mileage as that's what he wanted
 
  #8  
Old 03-13-2019, 03:49 PM
00t444e's Avatar
00t444e
00t444e is offline
Captain
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Southern OH
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

I average about 13-14 mpg in mine.
 
  #9  
Old 03-13-2019, 06:51 PM
MoparFanatic21's Avatar
MoparFanatic21
MoparFanatic21 is offline
Legend
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 8,035
Received 307 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 00t444e
I average about 13-14 mpg in mine.
That's what I get in my 2500 360!
 
  #10  
Old 03-13-2019, 06:52 PM
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
HeyYou is offline
Administrator
Dodge Forum Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Clayton MI
Posts: 82,514
Likes: 0
Received 3,388 Likes on 3,128 Posts
Default

Supercharge the 3.9. Probably get better gas mileage too.
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:21 AM.