2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

3.9l V6

Old Mar 10, 2019 | 04:16 AM
  #1  
MoparFanatic21's Avatar
MoparFanatic21
Thread Starter
|
Legend
Veteran: Marine Corps
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 8,098
Likes: 318
Default 3.9l V6

Anybody have any experience with them? Im going to look at a 2002 Dakota with that engine for my pap and washer to make sure it's a good motor. I always stayed away from V6s as they are known to be weak compared to V8s. The four said the only known is it will shut off sometimes but will start right back up. My dad's 06 Ram does that, so any suggestions there? I talked the guy down from $1500 to $500.
Thanks guys
Also he's coming over from FORD lol
 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2019 | 08:53 AM
  #2  
rebeltaz83's Avatar
rebeltaz83
Veteran
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 494
Likes: 8
From: at home
Default

Just in a Dakota. They are weak, don't really save on gas from the v8s. I averaged 15 highway and City it didn't matter. Good for a daily if you don't haul/tow allot. I pulled a goldwing on a 6'x12' trailer the truck knew it was back there, it was pathetic lol. But it got the truck itself around pretty good, never had any trouble, just a water pump after 110,000 miles.
 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2019 | 11:46 AM
  #3  
MoparFanatic21's Avatar
MoparFanatic21
Thread Starter
|
Legend
Veteran: Marine Corps
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 8,098
Likes: 318
Default

Originally Posted by rebeltaz83
Just in a Dakota. They are weak, don't really save on gas from the v8s. I averaged 15 highway and City it didn't matter. Good for a daily if you don't haul/tow allot. I pulled a goldwing on a 6'x12' trailer the truck knew it was back there, it was pathetic lol. But it got the truck itself around pretty good, never had any trouble, just a water pump after 110,000 miles.
Goog to know! He won't be towing at all, he maybe hauling some house stuff (boxes, tables, etc).
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2019 | 10:28 AM
  #4  
Bumblet00th's Avatar
Bumblet00th
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default

They aren't bad, they're just as reliable as their 5.2 counterparts, mine currently has the 3.9 and she's trooped along since December 2000. All thats been changed heavy maintainence wise is a water pump. They endure a lot and are pretty strong, but they lack the power v8s do. Only reason I'd see using a v6 is if you were to doing light duty work like hauling garbage or lumber or such. As much flak as they get they aren't that bad of a motor
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2019 | 02:41 PM
  #5  
MoparFanatic21's Avatar
MoparFanatic21
Thread Starter
|
Legend
Veteran: Marine Corps
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 8,098
Likes: 318
Default

Originally Posted by Bumblet00th
They aren't bad, they're just as reliable as their 5.2 counterparts, mine currently has the 3.9 and she's trooped along since December 2000. All thats been changed heavy maintainence wise is a water pump. They endure a lot and are pretty strong, but they lack the power v8s do. Only reason I'd see using a v6 is if you were to doing light duty work like hauling garbage or lumber or such. As much flak as they get they aren't that bad of a motor
He won't be doing heavy hauling or towing so he should be fine
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2019 | 03:18 PM
  #6  
00t444e's Avatar
00t444e
Captain
5 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 684
Likes: 45
From: Southern OH
Default

They run good and are reliable but they don't have much power, even with a 5 speed my 3.9 feels slow. I had a Ford Ranger automatic with the 4.0 V6 and it would run circles around this 3.9. I plan on putting a V8 in it soon.
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2019 | 03:44 PM
  #7  
MoparFanatic21's Avatar
MoparFanatic21
Thread Starter
|
Legend
Veteran: Marine Corps
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 8,098
Likes: 318
Default

Originally Posted by 00t444e
They run good and are reliable but they don't have much power, even with a 5 speed my 3.9 feels slow. I had a Ford Ranger automatic with the 4.0 V6 and it would run circles around this 3.9. I plan on putting a V8 in it soon.
He wanted a v6 truck so I figured a little Dakota would give him a little bit better gas mileage as that's what he wanted
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2019 | 03:49 PM
  #8  
00t444e's Avatar
00t444e
Captain
5 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 684
Likes: 45
From: Southern OH
Default

I average about 13-14 mpg in mine.
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2019 | 06:51 PM
  #9  
MoparFanatic21's Avatar
MoparFanatic21
Thread Starter
|
Legend
Veteran: Marine Corps
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 8,098
Likes: 318
Default

Originally Posted by 00t444e
I average about 13-14 mpg in mine.
That's what I get in my 2500 360!
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2019 | 06:52 PM
  #10  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,397
Likes: 4,213
From: Clayton MI
Default

Supercharge the 3.9. Probably get better gas mileage too.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:44 PM.