2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Gear ratios and four wheel drive

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 29, 2020 | 11:14 AM
  #1  
Bk.randall's Avatar
Bk.randall
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default Gear ratios and four wheel drive

Hello all, I have a 2000 ram 1500 with the 5.9l auto. Recently I have swapped the front axle with a 1996. My truck says to have 3:55s, I believe it bc it’s a dog with 35s lol. But I changed on the fluid in the new to me front axle from a 96’ and when I did I counted the gear teeth to find out what the ratio is and I came up with 3:54. Now with winter approaching and needed my 4x4 again. I’m wondering if the 3:54s are just 3:55s but Chrysler just rounded up, or if I need new gears before installing my front driveshaft again and using 4x4. Any feedback is greatly appreciated.
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2020 | 11:29 AM
  #2  
MoparFanatic21's Avatar
MoparFanatic21
Legend
Veteran: Marine Corps
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 8,098
Likes: 318
Default

Originally Posted by Bk.randall
Hello all, I have a 2000 ram 1500 with the 5.9l auto. Recently I have swapped the front axle with a 1996. My truck says to have 3:55s, I believe it bc it’s a dog with 35s lol. But I changed on the fluid in the new to me front axle from a 96’ and when I did I counted the gear teeth to find out what the ratio is and I came up with 3:54. Now with winter approaching and needed my 4x4 again. I’m wondering if the 3:54s are just 3:55s but Chrysler just rounded up, or if I need new gears before installing my front driveshaft again and using 4x4. Any feedback is greatly appreciated.
That's how Chrysler was 3.54s were 3.55s the bigger issue would be going to a smaller brake caliper
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2020 | 12:34 PM
  #3  
Bk.randall's Avatar
Bk.randall
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MoparFanatic21
That's how Chrysler was 3.54s were 3.55s the bigger issue would be going to a smaller brake caliper
So they are the same then? For sure? I don’t really wanna change the transfer case lol. And the smaller calipers are no biggy. I already have the axle in and been driving the truck. Brakes feel the same honestly.
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2020 | 01:05 PM
  #4  
MoparFanatic21's Avatar
MoparFanatic21
Legend
Veteran: Marine Corps
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 8,098
Likes: 318
Default

Originally Posted by Bk.randall
So they are the same then? For sure? I don’t really wanna change the transfer case lol. And the smaller calipers are no biggy. I already have the axle in and been driving the truck. Brakes feel the same honestly.
That's exactly how Chrysler did it. Even if they didn't .01 difference won't hurt anything. Chrysler marketed 3.54s as 3.55s
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2020 | 01:09 PM
  #5  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,453
Likes: 4,218
From: Clayton MI
Default

Yeah, that tiny bit of possible difference simply isn't going to matter. Still and all, do NOT use 4x4 on high traction surfaces. That WILL break things.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:17 AM.