2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Rock Solid steering column bushing

Old Dec 17, 2024 | 12:45 PM
  #21  
Keith_L's Avatar
Keith_L
Thread Starter
|
Record Breaker
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 191
From: United States
Default

Dunno what to tell ya except the Ali bearing fits in the OEM cup (shrug)
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2024 | 01:06 PM
  #22  
Smithsonite's Avatar
Smithsonite
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2024
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default

Well, that answers the question then - it's a non issue.

I figured that extra 2mm would be beneficial anyway - a slight press fit is much better than an EXACT fit, otherwise the bearing would constantly slide down over every big bump.
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2025 | 05:26 PM
  #23  
Skeptic68W's Avatar
Skeptic68W
Veteran
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 412
Likes: 26
Default

Hey boys, can anyone report on how this bearing setup worked out? I have mine apart right now since I've got the driver fender off. The stock setup appears to be in good condition, I could clean it up and re-install if necessary, but if this has produced any marked improvement, I'll slam a full bearing in there. I ordered a good NSK Japanese bearing in that size before taking mine apart, so now I'm just faced with the decision of whether to use it or the stock setup.
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2025 | 06:24 PM
  #24  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,461
Likes: 4,218
From: Clayton MI
Default

If you already have it, might just as well install it.
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2025 | 06:34 PM
  #25  
Skeptic68W's Avatar
Skeptic68W
Veteran
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 412
Likes: 26
Default

Originally Posted by HeyYou
If you already have it, might just as well install it.
I guess I'm just curious if there's any need for the axial control. I mean why would Chrysler use such a weird type of bearing instead of a standard one in the first place? I have a hard time believing it was significantly cheaper, but maybe it was. Idk.
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2025 | 06:36 PM
  #26  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,461
Likes: 4,218
From: Clayton MI
Default

It's chrysler. Someone probably mis-ordered them for some other application, they would fit, so dodge figgered "Why not."
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2025 | 07:07 PM
  #27  
Skeptic68W's Avatar
Skeptic68W
Veteran
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 412
Likes: 26
Default

Lol, that's true.

I'm probably going to make the swap. Any reason to re-install the preload spring with that bearing?
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2025 | 09:18 PM
  #28  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,461
Likes: 4,218
From: Clayton MI
Default

Not sure what it's purpose is, so, I don't have an answer for that..... I would be tempted to reinstall it, just *because*.....
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2025 | 09:49 PM
  #29  
Skeptic68W's Avatar
Skeptic68W
Veteran
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 412
Likes: 26
Default

Originally Posted by HeyYou
Not sure what it's purpose is, so, I don't have an answer for that..... I would be tempted to reinstall it, just *because*.....
The purpose is to preload the centering ring that interfaces with the "wedding ring" bearing. The force of the spring is actually what centers the steering shaft. Without spring pressure it would wobble a fair bit, and I suspect because of the fact that the retainer has no groove on the shaft to create uniform installation, there were probably a bunch of trucks where that spring preload was weak and/or the retainer just slipped over time because it was trying to hold onto a slick surface, explaining the desire for people to seek out this Rock Solid solution to begin with.

In some sense the benefit to this arrangement is that it does allow for some play, which might absorb a little NVH. But mostly the benefit was probably that they didn't have to be that precise with the machining. Just slap it on there and let the spring preload take up the slack.

After more reading, I don't think the spring will serve any purpose with a full groove bearing.
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2025 | 09:53 PM
  #30  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,461
Likes: 4,218
From: Clayton MI
Default

Originally Posted by Skeptic68W
The purpose is to preload the centering ring that interfaces with the "wedding ring" bearing. The force of the spring is actually what centers the steering shaft. Without spring pressure it would wobble a fair bit, and I suspect because of the fact that the retainer has no groove on the shaft to create uniform installation, there were probably a bunch of trucks where that spring preload was weak and/or the retainer just slipped over time because it was trying to hold onto a slick surface, explaining the desire for people to seek out this Rock Solid solution to begin with.

In some sense the benefit to this arrangement is that it does allow for some play, which might absorb a little NVH. But mostly the benefit was probably that they didn't have to be that precise with the machining. Just slap it on there and let the spring preload take up the slack.

After more reading, I don't think the spring will serve any purpose with a full groove bearing.
Yeah, I do believe you are correct. So long as the bearing stays in place, you should be just fine.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:43 PM.