3rd Gen Dakota 2005 - 2011 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 3rd Gen Dakota.

Colorado pickup for 2009

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 09:13 PM
  #41  
turbot_bird's Avatar
turbot_bird
Record Breaker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,147
Likes: 0
From: Winter Garden, Fl
Default

Originally Posted by lghtngblt02
Talk abotu a good run of bad luck for Jamey! Man everything is out for ya
I know, I heard the noise and was like "what did I do now" as I watched the light bounce.
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 08:17 AM
  #42  
Racinartist's Avatar
Racinartist
All Star
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
From: Dirty Jerzey
Default

Originally Posted by BAdassR/T
thats a load of **** if you go check out the curb weight on these pigs its 5k..
and to be honest dont expect to see many of these on the road......
Oh? Right from dodge.com it says my truck (TRX4 crew cab 4X4) weighs 4654 lbs with the V6. So add another 50-100 lbs for the V8, along with 1 or 2 other options and voila! You end up with 4700+ lbs.
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 08:42 AM
  #43  
lghtngblt02's Avatar
lghtngblt02
The RAM Administrator
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,647
Likes: 12
From: Lemoyne, Pennsylvania
Default

Originally Posted by turbot_bird
I know, I heard the noise and was like "what did I do now" as I watched the light bounce.
haha I can imagine.

Originally Posted by Racinartist
Oh? Right from dodge.com it says my truck (TRX4 crew cab 4X4) weighs 4654 lbs with the V6. So add another 50-100 lbs for the V8, along with 1 or 2 other options and voila! You end up with 4700+ lbs.
Yeah my Dak weighs in at 4700 lbs
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 09:52 AM
  #44  
graythang's Avatar
graythang
Thread Starter
|
Record Breaker
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, FL
Default

No matter what it may be killer fast but it is still *** ugly. Too small too light not much in a way of a real truck. If your only buying it for go then have at it.
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 11:16 AM
  #45  
baracis's Avatar
baracis
Record Breaker
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
Default

That's why I bought the Dakota, but yea, they are expensive. I'll pay off my Dak first...hopefully the SS will be out by then and I'll be at a new job.
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 01:28 PM
  #46  
baracis's Avatar
baracis
Record Breaker
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
Default

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64-j1...eature=related

I think I just creamed myself...
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 02:08 PM
  #47  
Altair's Avatar
Altair
Dak attack!
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 11,333
Likes: 1
From: Turn down the heat please
Default

SS or not it's still ugly and it's a poor excuse of a truck. Their old S10's were better built and get more respect from me than the Colorado/Canyon twins...
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 03:46 PM
  #48  
Cuban11182's Avatar
Cuban11182
All Star
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

My Raider Durocross weights 4940.
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 05:14 PM
  #49  
BAdassR/T's Avatar
BAdassR/T
Record Breaker
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
From:
Default

Originally Posted by Racinartist
Oh? Right from dodge.com it says my truck (TRX4 crew cab 4X4) weighs 4654 lbs with the V6. So add another 50-100 lbs for the V8, along with 1 or 2 other options and voila! You end up with 4700+ lbs.
i thought u were saying that the Colorado was light..... bc there not.. my bad if i misunderstood you......
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 09:46 PM
  #50  
cramerica's Avatar
cramerica
Record Breaker
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
From: Central NY
Default

A Hemi Dakota would eat one of these for lunch
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:26 AM.