3rd Gen Dakota 2005 - 2011 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 3rd Gen Dakota.

CAI and 3.7

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-11-2009 | 09:44 PM
fieldmedic8404's Avatar
fieldmedic8404
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: st. charles mo
Default CAI and 3.7

i am currently using the K&N drop in filter. and was looking at the CAI part # 63-1558 the web site dynos a raider and shows a 9.22 hp @ 4200 rpm.

i was wondering if any other 3.7 drivers were useing and what to expect out of real world power and gas milage.
 
  #2  
Old 07-11-2009 | 11:57 PM
biker_ahoy's Avatar
biker_ahoy
Captain
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 623
Likes: 1
From: Fort St. John BC
Default

You'll get a few more HP out of the deal but not as much as they claim,
I still think it's a good idea and want to get my truck done as well.
 
  #3  
Old 07-12-2009 | 10:38 PM
fieldmedic8404's Avatar
fieldmedic8404
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: st. charles mo
Default

i was more looking at $$ vs improvement and trieng to weight my optgions right now i am pretty happy with the drop in. i was hoping some one else had used both and could tell me what diff the seen between the drop in and the kit.
 
  #4  
Old 07-13-2009 | 09:04 AM
forestwcat58's Avatar
forestwcat58
Amateur
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Ocala, FL
Default

i made my own and go abou two mpg more
 
  #5  
Old 07-13-2009 | 04:00 PM
MonkeyWrench4000's Avatar
MonkeyWrench4000
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,513
Likes: 2
Default

I had it, and sold it. I had the plastic series, the one that claimed most hp gain.

I noticed nothing. Realistically, you wouldnt notice 5hp. Also, I gained NO mpg. The stock intake and paper filter would have to be starving the engine of air for an intake to give a vehicle more mpg. The intake really only gives the small hp gain at the top end of the rpm range, so technically it helps flow a little better in the 4000-5000rpm range. So there is no way anyone is gaining any MPG with an intake setup.

The only time I feel an intake is worth its cost, is when its going into an application with forced induction that has a bad intake setup from the get go. If I remember correctly, the SRT4 is a worth while application for an intake. Most all turbo applications will net a healthy gain with an intake kit.

I wouldnt invest in one for the 3.7L.

But there IS a HP gain with them, so if thats what your after, then go for it.
 
  #6  
Old 07-13-2009 | 10:20 PM
fieldmedic8404's Avatar
fieldmedic8404
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: st. charles mo
Default

no i was looking for more mpg if possible. am getting close to 18 mpg and would like to push it ti overf 20 if poss. i know it is probly just a dream but would be nice to suceed
 
  #7  
Old 07-14-2009 | 07:26 AM
cramerica's Avatar
cramerica
Record Breaker
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
From: Central NY
Default

Adjust your driving style. That is the only guaranteed way to gain MPG. Intake and exhaust are marginal at best. My truck averaged 18.1 last tank.
 
  #8  
Old 07-15-2009 | 01:54 PM
donkeypunch's Avatar
donkeypunch
King Jackass
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 5
From: Aurora, CO
Default

Well, I had an interesting idea. From most people's feedback, the CAI is not worth it for us 3.7L owners. However, lets take a look at what you get from installing a CAI.

Better airflow
Reusable filter element
Better gas milage (opinion, most claim that this does not do anything)
Cool "suck in air" sound when free reving the engine.

One should consider cost vs. benifit here. So I did.

I put in a K&N drop in filter. $40.00
Took out the factory air box and cut two healthy sized holes. $free

Didn't notice any power difference, didn't gain any gas milage, but got the cool "suck in air sound". Winner. And yes, the holes were located so that when I splash through big puddles, I am ok.
 




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:41 PM.