3rd Gen Dakota 2005 - 2011 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 3rd Gen Dakota.

tuner

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #41  
Old 02-20-2010 | 10:38 AM
rengnath's Avatar
rengnath
Champion
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 0
From: Greenfield, Wisconsin
Default

I just dont have any place to really open it up safely. After 100mph, I dont feel to comfortable on a freeway passing other cars. I know currently when I go 70MPH Im sitting at about 2100 RPM. When I do open it up, 2nd gear will take me up to 80MPH.

My old 94 Chevy 2wd 1500 with a v6 and a 5 speed couldnt go any faster after it hit the top end in 3rd gear. I had 33in tires on the back, and at 80 I was going closer to 100, and that was just about as far as the engine would push it. When I red lined 3rd and threw it in to 4th, it just dogged down. So it would definetly be interesting to see where a Dakota hits that point.
 
  #42  
Old 02-21-2010 | 02:20 AM
rengnath's Avatar
rengnath
Champion
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 0
From: Greenfield, Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by bain64
I am very curious how fast stock will go. With 3.55 gears and the auto 545 tranny I run 74 mph at 1900 rpms. It doesn't even want to shift to 5th until you are at like 68 mph and letting off the go pedal. I think it would go pretty far! I know some of you have tested this, what will the 4.7 do stock? How fast guys?
Alright bain64, I finally found out tonight what a mostly stock truck does. First, I want to say I have the 3.55 gears, but Im running closer to 2000rpm @ 70mph FWIW, so I dont know why theres such a difference there between mine and yours. Other details are, the truck has a K&N drop in, a Airaid modular intake tube, and a SC tuned to the 91 performance tune and I run 93 octane fuel. For advanced options, the truck has an increased rev limiter to 6000 rpm, and the 1-2 and 2-3 WOT shifts are about 5700. I think the first shift is at 5750, and the second shift is at 5700.

The temp was about 35 degrees on a foggy night. The road was a country road, some bumps, and a couple hills. I didnt do any times or anything, I just wanted to see how fast I could really go. ***** out, my truck will only hit 110 on the average road. If the road was smooth and open, it might be different. I was hitting bumps though and had to let off a couple times for curves before I ran out of road. After 90 though, the pickup is nearly gone. At 110, there is absolutly no power. I guess I dont need my top speed increased to 140, I cant even hit the factory set 112.

Im kind of disappointed. I thought I could atleast hit 110 before running low on power, and 120 before there was no more. I have to find a nice smooth road though to really test this out. With bumps and everything, there were a couple times where I just had to let off.

Now with my 3.55 gearing, is that good or bad? I thought it was good for low end power, not as good for gas mileage. Is this correct? So pretty much, if you had the room, a truck with the 4.10 (or what ever the other option that was available is) gears should be able to go faster than a truck with 3.55 gearing?
 
  #43  
Old 02-22-2010 | 02:03 AM
Raptor7's Avatar
Raptor7
Thread Starter
|
Rookie
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: Alaska
Default

so what if the gas stations do not have 93 octane? how big of a difference is that going to make if you plan on doing some of the things like rengnath mentioned?
 
  #44  
Old 02-22-2010 | 02:07 AM
Blown287's Avatar
Blown287
Grand Champion
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,293
Likes: 3
From: Kekaha, HI
Default

It won't be that big of a deal. If you get pre-det "ping" just put the tuner in and load the 87 tune (less aggressive). You can also get octane booster, etc.
 
  #45  
Old 02-22-2010 | 10:43 AM
rengnath's Avatar
rengnath
Champion
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 0
From: Greenfield, Wisconsin
Default

Technically the 93 isnt even necessary, I just use it because they dont have 91 at the BP gas stations I go to. If I put 91 in there from another gas station, there shouldnt even be a pinging technically speaking.
 
  #46  
Old 02-22-2010 | 02:43 PM
Raptor7's Avatar
Raptor7
Thread Starter
|
Rookie
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: Alaska
Default

so with the stations here only having up to 90 octane and low as 87 octane, do you think i could get a tuner set to those specifications? also would it even be worth it at all? i mean really what all could i benefit from it?
 
  #47  
Old 02-23-2010 | 11:33 AM
rengnath's Avatar
rengnath
Champion
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 0
From: Greenfield, Wisconsin
Default

Correct me if Im wrong, but at higher altitudes a 90 octane gas is comparable to our higher octane at a lower alititude, right?
 
  #48  
Old 02-23-2010 | 06:14 PM
Raptor7's Avatar
Raptor7
Thread Starter
|
Rookie
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: Alaska
Default

i honestly have no clue...i will ask around with some of the guys here though. as soon as i get an answer i will post it here.
 
  #49  
Old 02-23-2010 | 06:25 PM
Blown287's Avatar
Blown287
Grand Champion
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,293
Likes: 3
From: Kekaha, HI
Default

The only reason I suggested ther higer octane was the proposal for aggressive tuning with hotter plugs. Generally a higher octane fuel will give more power without the risk of pre-det. I say give it a shot and see how it works. The good thing about tuners is you can always put a less aggressive tune in.
 
  #50  
Old 02-23-2010 | 07:07 PM
rengnath's Avatar
rengnath
Champion
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 0
From: Greenfield, Wisconsin
Default

At least you will get shifting performance.
If you want to go with the 91 tune but are getting the pinging from the engine, you can choose to 1. Switch to the 87 tune or 2. Get an octane booster
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:15 PM.