3rd Gen Dakota 2005 - 2011 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 3rd Gen Dakota.

Rear Wheel Dakota MPG - 4.7 6 Speed vs 3.7 6 Speed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-28-2012, 01:26 PM
madredr1's Avatar
madredr1
madredr1 is offline
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Rear Wheel Dakota MPG - 4.7 6 Speed vs 3.7 6 Speed

Hello all,

So I'm undecided as to which one I should buy:

2006 4.7 RWD Dakota 6-Speed

or

2008 3.7 RWD Dakota 6-Speed

I know both of them sit around the 19mpg on the highway mark - my drive to work is ALL highway and I'm just curious, can some current owners of v6 and v8 2 wheel drive Dakotas chime in on their mpg numbers they see?

I'm swaying towards the v8, but if the 6 is going get me consistently better mpg, I may go that route...
 
  #2  
Old 11-28-2012, 02:43 PM
lghtngblt02's Avatar
lghtngblt02
lghtngblt02 is offline
The RAM Administrator
Dodge Forum Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lemoyne, Pennsylvania
Posts: 9,649
Received 22 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

I can't speak for the 6 Speeds as mine is the 5 speed auto, but one of the reasons I chose the v8 over the v6 was because the mileage was practically the same between the two and for the little difference, I decide the v8 would give me more options for hp, torque, towing, resale, aftermarket, etc. Also note I owned a 3.9 prior to this so I kind of understood the even less attention it received as compared to the others
 
  #3  
Old 11-28-2012, 03:12 PM
DodgeCares's Avatar
DodgeCares
DodgeCares is offline
Champion
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Mopar HQ
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by madredr1
Hello all,

So I'm undecided as to which one I should buy:

2006 4.7 RWD Dakota 6-Speed

or

2008 3.7 RWD Dakota 6-Speed

I know both of them sit around the 19mpg on the highway mark - my drive to work is ALL highway and I'm just curious, can some current owners of v6 and v8 2 wheel drive Dakotas chime in on their mpg numbers they see?

I'm swaying towards the v8, but if the 6 is going get me consistently better mpg, I may go that route...

Mad,

If you want a build sheet on either or both of these PM me the vins and I'll send them out. I will also check for recalls and warranty restrictions.
 
  #4  
Old 11-28-2012, 04:01 PM
dakotaff's Avatar
dakotaff
dakotaff is offline
Champion
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Jersey
Posts: 3,954
Received 82 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

Yeah, there's only a minor difference in mpg's. I would definitely get the 4.7, you'll be kicking yourself later if you don't.
There's not too many 4.7 manuals around, it seems, you're lucky to have found one.
 
  #5  
Old 11-28-2012, 05:40 PM
DaKoCuN's Avatar
DaKoCuN
DaKoCuN is offline
Professional
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The ugly&boring Cancun!
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

3.7L V6 here...
If I could I would get the V8, and I said "if I could" 'cause the V8 is not for sale where I live.
 
  #6  
Old 11-29-2012, 11:53 PM
madredr1's Avatar
madredr1
madredr1 is offline
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So I was reading the car fax on the 4.7 2006 and the previous owner had tie rod ends replaced in 2007 2009 and 2011....what is that all about?!?
 
  #7  
Old 11-30-2012, 08:42 AM
cheeseburger's Avatar
cheeseburger
cheeseburger is offline
All Star
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Talladega Alabama
Posts: 942
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by madredr1
So I was reading the car fax on the 4.7 2006 and the previous owner had tie rod ends replaced in 2007 2009 and 2011....what is that all about?!?
the factory tie rods are absolute Crap, and they were probably replaced by the dealer under warranty (possibly) so they kept replacing crap with crap.

there's no way around it, The factory front end components (bushings and tie rods, ball joints) are not built to last.


Get the v8, Its just cooler.
 
  #8  
Old 12-02-2012, 02:14 PM
thecause17's Avatar
thecause17
thecause17 is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SW PA
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That's why all my stuff has been replaced with Moog. Once and one.
 
  #9  
Old 12-05-2012, 06:42 PM
madredr1's Avatar
madredr1
madredr1 is offline
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thecause17
That's why all my stuff has been replaced with Moog. Once and one.
So replacing with Moog will take care of the early wear issues? If that's the case, I will make sure I do that if they fail again.
 
  #10  
Old 12-05-2012, 08:12 PM
thecause17's Avatar
thecause17
thecause17 is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SW PA
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They're a better quality part, and have grease fittings that you need to grease as needed for everything to last. I don't mind greasing everything. It's a lot better, and cheaper than replacing parts again.
 


Quick Reply: Rear Wheel Dakota MPG - 4.7 6 Speed vs 3.7 6 Speed



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:28 AM.