2015 R/T - Lemon, not lemonade.
#11
I was assuming he bought it new, in that case, the dealer would be liable if they sold a wrecked vehicle as new without disclosing that, but if he bought it used, your right.....buyer beware. But still, there is usually a damage disclaimer that is signed whenever vehicles are bought and sold...but, like a carfax, they are only as good as the information fed to them.
#12
I was assuming he bought it new, in that case, the dealer would be liable if they sold a wrecked vehicle as new without disclosing that, but if he bought it used, your right.....buyer beware. But still, there is usually a damage disclaimer that is signed whenever vehicles are bought and sold...but, like a carfax, they are only as good as the information fed to them.
Carfax would also tell you about title changes so you can verify it it's a "new vehicle" or not.
But yeah, if he took possession and it only had 2 miles on it like mine did, then it's a quality control issue with the plant that should have been noted on delivery and rejected delivery. But even though that's too late, they still should fix it.
#15
Rental car companies do the same thing when they can get away with it
#16
Unless someone knows different, I don't think a Carfax is worth the paper it's printed on. By what means do they collect data? It would rely on any car dealer (body shop, repair shop, etc.) to enter repairs based on VIN number and we all know that all dealers/body/repair shops are renowned for being scrupulously honest businesses.
#17
Unless someone knows different, I don't think a Carfax is worth the paper it's printed on. By what means do they collect data? It would rely on any car dealer (body shop, repair shop, etc.) to enter repairs based on VIN number and we all know that all dealers/body/repair shops are renowned for being scrupulously honest businesses.
As stated, they are only worth the information fed to them; however, they can be a good tool for finding out accidents that are public record.