Wanna whoop them chipped diesles!
Originally Posted by John M
There's nothing magic about the CTD's power production. It's because it's big cubes + forced induction. The fact that it's in a HD truck means the rest of the drivetrain is better prepared to handle the power. Diesel is particularly suited to forced induction because it better tolerates the added heat.
You can turbo a Hemi, but like any add-on turbo it isn't anywhere near as good as a factory setup. Aftermarket programming methods just don't offer he same level of tuning control as an OEM setup. If there was a way to fit a Roots-style blower to a Hemi it'd be a lot closer comparison.
The inline 6 form is not holding back the Cummins in the power department. That's an inherently strong package with better natural balance and thicker walls in the block.
FWIW, gasoline engines can make the same kind of power. My brother's Mercedes (CL65 AMG) makes 740 torque bone stock, and does so from 2k through 4k rpm. Chip it and it goes to over 900 ft/lbs. That's just what turbos + cubes (6.0 liter v12) will do for you.
I run even with a friend's chipped/intake/exhaust 2wd 7.3 Excursion. I know, mine is 1k lbs lighter since it's a 1500 but I'm still happy with "just" a Hemi.
You can turbo a Hemi, but like any add-on turbo it isn't anywhere near as good as a factory setup. Aftermarket programming methods just don't offer he same level of tuning control as an OEM setup. If there was a way to fit a Roots-style blower to a Hemi it'd be a lot closer comparison.
The inline 6 form is not holding back the Cummins in the power department. That's an inherently strong package with better natural balance and thicker walls in the block.
FWIW, gasoline engines can make the same kind of power. My brother's Mercedes (CL65 AMG) makes 740 torque bone stock, and does so from 2k through 4k rpm. Chip it and it goes to over 900 ft/lbs. That's just what turbos + cubes (6.0 liter v12) will do for you.
I run even with a friend's chipped/intake/exhaust 2wd 7.3 Excursion. I know, mine is 1k lbs lighter since it's a 1500 but I'm still happy with "just" a Hemi.
Nope, I don't know anything about any kind of forced induction. Unlike those that regurgitate what they read, I actually modify vehicles. I supercharged a 4Runner (roots) which made it much more fun to drive. I've owned over a dozen turbo vehicles including two twin-turbo Stealths and a six Diamond Star vehicles. I'm finishing a 400whp buildup on the Subaru sedan in my driveway -- the same place I built a 500+ whp Supra a few years ago.
I know about efficiencies. I also know that if you want a Hemi to produce a diesel-like powerband (instant torque right off idle) and response, you're going to have to do it with a roots blower. You'll make more peak power with a turbo or centrifugal supercharger but it'll never have the "snap" a roots blower does.
I know about efficiencies. I also know that if you want a Hemi to produce a diesel-like powerband (instant torque right off idle) and response, you're going to have to do it with a roots blower. You'll make more peak power with a turbo or centrifugal supercharger but it'll never have the "snap" a roots blower does.
Now, on the regurgitation part???.... Roots style is a factory style supercharger. They BLOW! The Eaton's are called Heatons for a reason. That's all they produce. They are very inneficient and would be the last thing that would ever go on my vehicle especially on a higher revving engine. A Twin Screw is 100x better than a roots anyday. Much more efficient and can produce 20-30% even more power in the same psi range and has a much wider power range. They have a very low starting powerband and are the new Era Roots.
Didn't the 4runners come stock with an available TRD supercharger?? That means you must have been running the stock tune at 6.5psi with only 195hp. Also, stock Vr-4's were only 296hp and 415ft'lbs. They had a descent amount of drivetrain looss because of the AWD feature as well as many were auto's. i think they were 18% loss with stick and like 22% w/auto thorugh the drivetrain.
And the Dimond stars.....well, they had a whole lotta problems factory with them. All they are good for is rebuilding the motor, replacing the super weak crappy trans and adding a turbo set-up with 30+psi to get enough power to overtake the v8's. I ran a 92 laser w/35psi and toasted it with my Cobra. The kid had 10k into the car and it wasn't even painted and had rust???wtf??
Just because you have owned turbo'd or S/C'ed vehicels doesn't mean you know exactly how they work or how they are installed or which components interchange with which sorta thing. They are Billions of car drivers and I bet half of them cannot even change their own tire yet they have been driving for Years! So, to say just because I owned a turbo car means I can pull everything apart and put it together bilnd folded and in my sleep. No. but close....lol I haven't had dirct contact with many Turbo set-ups, but have had a fair hand in installing Superchargers both Centrifugal and twin screw. The only time i have touched a Roots style is to remove it and throw it in the garbage.
lol. We don't have a lot of real modded ctd's around here. The fastest I've seen one run is low 13s. There's 1 11sec single cab duramax I see every now and then. Other then that its usually my 2 buddies powerjokes. One runs low 13s and the other mid 12s on spray high 12s without it. They are pretty impressive for 8000lb trucks, but they should be with more then 6L and 30+psi of boost. hell if my truck had that i'd be in the low 10s high 9s
See that? TUNING CONTROL. I never once said the factory tune was best. You're not going to get fine control by slapping on piggyback modules. That's especially true with Dodge's super-secret ECMs. You won't get OEM driveability with a turboed Ram unless you replace the computer with an aftermarket unit. You can get close but there will be gremlins. Meanwhile, turbo diesels are tunable because all that control is available in the factory ECM.
I never said I didn't tune. I moved from piggybacks on the DSMs to direct control of the factory ECU on my Subaru. I have access to every parameter and no longer have to trick the ECU into doing what I want. There are similar products for domestics like LSEdit and HP Tuners. The Stealth used the VPC and GCC products (no longer made) from HKS. It converted the car from mass air flow to MAP and allowed rpm-based fueling corrections.
Now, on the regurgitation part???.... Roots style is a factory style supercharger. They BLOW! The Eaton's are called Heatons for a reason. That's all they produce. They are very inneficient and would be the last thing that would ever go on my vehicle especially on a higher revving engine. A Twin Screw is 100x better than a roots anyday. Much more efficient and can produce 20-30% even more power in the same psi range and has a much wider power range. They have a very low starting powerband and are the new Era Roots.
And the Dimond stars.....well, they had a whole lotta problems factory with them. All they are good for is rebuilding the motor, replacing the super weak crappy trans and adding a turbo set-up with 30+psi to get enough power to overtake the v8's. I ran a 92 laser w/35psi and toasted it with my Cobra. The kid had 10k into the car and it wasn't even painted and had rust???wtf??
Eyeball dsmtimes.org and you'll see that the top 200 cars run 10s or quicker; there are 83 in the nines or faster. They're not the perfect car but they're no less capable than any other car. You can't use the usual recipe of "strip the car, big cubes, spray, slicks" to go fast but a fast daily driver is easy.
I've been e-arguing since ~ 1993, when all the major message board software was still in beta testing.

Sorry... That was just begging for this.








They are pretty though.