3rd Gen Ram Tech 2002-2008 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2002 through 2008 Rams Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Hemi vs SS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 09-01-2009, 03:58 PM
dirtydog's Avatar
dirtydog
dirtydog is offline
Moderate User
Dodge Forum Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 17,003
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by butch1581
So how would my truck compare to my buddies 2009 silverado extended cab with the 5.3? Would he beat me? His truck is bone stock.
You'd tear him up by atleast a few lengths depending on his gearing.
 
  #12  
Old 09-01-2009, 04:27 PM
butch1581's Avatar
butch1581
butch1581 is offline
Captain
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Neenah WI
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

good to know.......Now I can challange him.....Maybe I will get my tuner first!

I wish I could beat my buddy with a 2000 F-350, chipped, full exhaust, perf. tranny, 33" tires. Never raced him, but I assume he would crush me. Not sure of his gearing though
 
  #13  
Old 09-01-2009, 04:50 PM
05DodgeRamHemi's Avatar
05DodgeRamHemi
05DodgeRamHemi is offline
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maine
Posts: 3,865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dirtydog
The SS;s don't have nearly the drivetrain loss as the Rams do, so even if the weight and numbers were identical. The SS would own a Ram for the simple fact of Chryslers terrible drivetrain loss. i need to have a chat with their Engineer's because clearly they are morons at nearly 30% loss.
Every dyno that I have seen is right about 28-30% drivetrain loss for the Rams. Where as other trucks like Titan and SS are not even 20% loss. 10% of 300hp is 30hp loss, so for 345 that's 100hp+ loss for the Rams. Thus why they dyno at 240ish rwhp on the dyno.
Honestly, that makes a whole lot of sense. I mean, don't get me wrong, I think my truck is a blast to drive and has a great boost for a truck, but it sure doesn't feel like 345 h/p at full throttle....so clearly the culprit is in the driveline.
 
  #14  
Old 09-01-2009, 05:03 PM
HemiLonestar's Avatar
HemiLonestar
HemiLonestar is offline
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: MD
Posts: 3,740
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

The transmission is the weak link in these vehicles. The TMR delete mod for 03's makes a world of difference as it is. A better torque converter is usually the next step before shelling out untold amounts of $$.
 
  #15  
Old 09-01-2009, 06:23 PM
dedogg's Avatar
dedogg
dedogg is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EJM05

bad a$$
 
  #16  
Old 09-01-2009, 06:39 PM
Bluesmanjesse's Avatar
Bluesmanjesse
Bluesmanjesse is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Anyone know of a tranny swap that would help the hemi? even a stick shift?
 
  #17  
Old 09-01-2009, 06:41 PM
mc35's Avatar
mc35
mc35 is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Canyon, TX
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

ok...here's a comparison. a buddy of mine has an SS, and another buddy has a single cab hemi. they raced back when the SS was completely stock, and the hemi was too. they raced twice....the hemi won both times by BARELY. so your quad cab, i'd imagine, would get dusted. if you want me to race his SS to let you find out, I will. But now he's got it lowered with a bed cover. and dual exhaust.
And another thing.....the baddest SS i have ever seen is on youtube. search: 04chase.
 
  #18  
Old 09-01-2009, 06:44 PM
mc35's Avatar
mc35
mc35 is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Canyon, TX
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

here's a quick vid of the SS i talked about. Here it is against a supercharged srt-8 charger.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHb5LGGJns4
 
  #19  
Old 09-01-2009, 07:20 PM
hemi slappin's Avatar
hemi slappin
hemi slappin is offline
Professional
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Saint Cloud, Florida
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HemiLonestar
The transmission is the weak link in these vehicles. The TMR delete mod for 03's makes a world of difference as it is. A better torque converter is usually the next step before shelling out untold amounts of $$.


TMR delete?? this is my first dodge.. so fill me in on this.. i dont know this abreviation
 
  #20  
Old 09-01-2009, 07:22 PM
hemiguy0302's Avatar
hemiguy0302
hemiguy0302 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Edmonton Ab Canada
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HammerZ71
'Tis true, every dyno I see of a stock Ram with 345 HP at the crank shows a RWHP in the upper 220s to mid 230s range. Pretty damn pathetic.

I bet I've said this a jillion times: Best engines on the planet matched with the worst trannies!!!
MMMM well even as a Hemi owner I will have to disagree with the best motors. GM in my opinion still wins with best over all drivetrain little power loss and way more bottom end. Then there is the aftermarket support which is basically endless. Just my cent and a half.
 


Quick Reply: Hemi vs SS



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:24 PM.