3rd Gen Ram Tech 2002-2008 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2002 through 2008 Rams Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Thermostat Good?Bad?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 12:27 PM
  #1  
butch1581's Avatar
butch1581
Thread Starter
|
Captain
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 635
Likes: 1
From: Neenah WI
Default Thermostat Good?Bad?

I posted in the FAQ section, but nobody really looks there very often so.....

It was mentioned in the FAQ that the 180* t stat lowers the temp and changes the A/F ratio for better preformance.........

With my mods (CAI, Predator 93 tune) would I bennefit from a 180 t-stat?

I thought that the predator took care of advancing the timing and modifying the A/F ratio? If it does I dont see any bennefit from it other than having colder heat in the middle of WI winter!
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 03:19 PM
  #2  
lxman1's Avatar
lxman1
Site Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 9,657
Likes: 24
From: Louisville, Ky
Default

Cooler heater and more engine wear is the only benefit from the 180 thermostat.
If it was a race only vehicle, then colder is better. You need the heat of the stock thermostat to seal the rings at their best and keep the oil from wanting to sludge up.
Not a wise investment on a late model engine with such tight tolerances.
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 03:22 PM
  #3  
xfeejayx's Avatar
xfeejayx
3rd gen Ram, Newbies
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,815
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

given that you are complaining abot could heat, i'd recommend against the colder tstat. I have seen no evidence that it helps anything prformance based. Even if it does, its nothing big.

maybe someone will contest this, but I don't see how colder coolant will change your A/F ration.
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 04:51 PM
  #4  
HammerZ71's Avatar
HammerZ71
Administrator
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,686
Likes: 21
From: South Georgia/East Florida
Default

I will contest this, I have had a wideband on my truck at KRC Performance. With CAI and Tuner with a Performance tune on my truck already, the addition of LT headers all worked to lean me out quite a bit. Not CEL lean, but fairly close.
Marty suggested I go to a 180* thermostat to keep the truck in closed loop, in which, the PCM will richen the mixture slightly (just as happens when your truck is warming up.

Worked for me, the change to the cooler thermostat brought me almost up to bone stock, factory A/F ratio.

I have NO numbers with just a CAI and performance tune (both act to lean the mix, one via more air entering the TB, the other by advancing the timing) but since my truck was still not lean enough to produce a CEL with LT headers as well, I don't think you are so lean that you NEED one.

For me, it's a band aide, since the only real way for me to richen the A/F would have been to get a piggyback A/F controller or a custom tune. The $20 thermostat is a much cheaper solution...
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 05:33 PM
  #5  
xfeejayx's Avatar
xfeejayx
3rd gen Ram, Newbies
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,815
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

that actually makes sense. how would keeping the engine cooler keep it closed loop? that's the opposite of what I would think would happen.
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 06:34 PM
  #6  
HammerZ71's Avatar
HammerZ71
Administrator
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,686
Likes: 21
From: South Georgia/East Florida
Default

Originally Posted by xfeejayx
that actually makes sense. how would keeping the engine cooler keep it closed loop? that's the opposite of what I would think would happen.
Sorry 'Feej, I were watching the Giant game whilst typing your reply, meant to say that the cooler t-stat would keep from entering closed loop...

I am getting too many logs on the fire, the other day I had guy buy 10 quarts of fluid for his diffs. I told him the rear took about 4.75 Qts and the front slightly less. Of course I meant to say pints... lol........................
 

Last edited by HammerZ71; Nov 22, 2009 at 06:37 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 06:53 PM
  #7  
lxman1's Avatar
lxman1
Site Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 9,657
Likes: 24
From: Louisville, Ky
Default

Well, at least he will have enough left for the next couple of changes
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 09:00 PM
  #8  
butch1581's Avatar
butch1581
Thread Starter
|
Captain
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 635
Likes: 1
From: Neenah WI
Default

thanks guys I know there is a little bit of a debate over this. With the predator tuner and the CAI do you think my truck is really running lean at all? I would think the predator would add fuel to make the correct ratio, am I wrong on that? Thanks again.
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 10:17 PM
  #9  
xfeejayx's Avatar
xfeejayx
3rd gen Ram, Newbies
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,815
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

with just a tuner and CAI, you're fine with the stocker. you'd probably do more harm than good with the tstat, cuz then your hands might be cold
 
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2009 | 05:03 AM
  #10  
abarmby's Avatar
abarmby
Champion
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,875
Likes: 1
From: North Eastern England
Default

If you fit a 180 in the depths of Winter........be prepared for very cold feet and some codes to be thrown.
I did this in the UK when temps were like 2-5 deg C and although it did add a "little pep" It hurt my mileage 2-3mpg and my heater was sooooo cold!
Not worth it in my case.
Al.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:44 PM.