3rd Gen Ram Tech 2002-2008 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2002 through 2008 Rams Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

4.7L Lost To Buddies 2007 Chrysler 300

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 12-09-2009, 09:42 AM
Off_Road_Teacher's Avatar
Off_Road_Teacher
Off_Road_Teacher is offline
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,759
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The 08 4.7 is rated at 310 hp.
 
  #22  
Old 12-09-2009, 10:07 AM
josemer09's Avatar
josemer09
josemer09 is offline
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

n/m i thought he was talking about the 08 hemi
 
  #23  
Old 12-09-2009, 11:03 PM
xill's Avatar
xill
xill is offline
Captain
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MikeHTally
300s don't get the 4.7 -- Choices are two sixes; 2.7 and 3.5, and two Hemis; 5.7 and 6.1 My Ram is fairly quick, but my C will eat his lunch. Same power and half a ton lighter.
v6s in that heavy car?? wtf?? i never looked into those cars simply because they're too popular among the wanna-be gangsters that like to pretend their driving a phantom. didnt wanna be lumped in with those clowns thats a pretty dumb move to put a 6 in a car like that though. i figured they would at least have smaller 8s for base models. what a joke...
 
  #24  
Old 12-09-2009, 11:09 PM
hemiguy0302's Avatar
hemiguy0302
hemiguy0302 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Edmonton Ab Canada
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The 3.5 is ok. The 2.7 is pretty anemic.
 
  #25  
Old 12-10-2009, 01:30 AM
Got_Hemi44's Avatar
Got_Hemi44
Got_Hemi44 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JoeHemi
There's a reason why the fat kid doesn't do good in track. You're truck is too fat to race.
Speak for yourself lol
 
  #26  
Old 12-10-2009, 02:16 PM
JoeHemi's Avatar
JoeHemi
JoeHemi is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Pierce County, Wa
Posts: 2,273
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

LOL, well Im sure you can beat the other fat kids but gravity will still make you his b!tch.
 
  #27  
Old 12-10-2009, 03:52 PM
BadHab1t's Avatar
BadHab1t
BadHab1t is offline
Grand Champion
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: TAMPA BAY
Posts: 5,930
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

http://cpwstore.carpartswholesale.co...S-V218205.html
you asked for intake deals here it is...best bang for your buck i love mine....dont buy tb spacers they are a waste of money get this and have your exhaust redone y-pipe free flowing exhaust and a superchips and youll have a new beast ....mine ok but its no ricer and i have minimal mods but i always remember its a TRUCK IT WEIGHS A TON.......
 
  #28  
Old 12-10-2009, 04:56 PM
V10Venom's Avatar
V10Venom
V10Venom is offline
Captain
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Imlay City, MI
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's not a 7,000# truck, more like 5300-5400#.
 
  #29  
Old 12-10-2009, 06:29 PM
MikeHTally's Avatar
MikeHTally
MikeHTally is offline
Champion
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: N. Florida
Posts: 4,702
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by xill
v6s in that heavy car?? wtf?? i never looked into those cars simply because they're too popular among the wanna-be gangsters that like to pretend their driving a phantom. didnt wanna be lumped in with those clowns thats a pretty dumb move to put a 6 in a car like that though. i figured they would at least have smaller 8s for base models. what a joke...
Heck, people put V-6s in Rams (3.7L). As for "clowns", maybe you'd like to try out my 300C against your truck. Try and follow me through some esses. There's a nice, long decreasing-radius turn off the interstate that my C will take at 70+ and not even make the tires fuss. I'll keep my "C" forever. Great comfort for trips and decent mileage.
 
  #30  
Old 12-10-2009, 06:32 PM
MikeHTally's Avatar
MikeHTally
MikeHTally is offline
Champion
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: N. Florida
Posts: 4,702
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by hemiguy0302
The 3.5 is ok. The 2.7 is pretty anemic.
True enough. When I was shopping for mine, I ignored the 2.7L, but tried the 3.5L. Rode great, handled well, but when I leaned on it, it was NOT a happy motor. My "C" just says, "bring it on".
 


Quick Reply: 4.7L Lost To Buddies 2007 Chrysler 300



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:47 PM.