Last edit by: IB Advertising
See related guides and technical advice from our community experts:
Browse all: Engine Guides
- Dodge Ram 1994-2008: V8 Performance Modifications
Overview of populra modifications to customize your Ram
Browse all: Engine Guides
Headers for 05 1500 hemi ram
#1
#2
#3
#4
#6
#7
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Georgia/East Florida
Posts: 24,686
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes
on
19 Posts
I asked a few guys who did the shorties on Rams who told me not to bother, the small gains didn't justify the cost or effort. But I talked to a couple with LTs (some who had tried shorties first) who swore by the long tubes - plus I was able to obtain some dyno files from Marty when he was at KRC Performance to confirm gains with LTs.
Personally, I couldn't feel much if anything really down low but in the mid and upper rpms it's very distinctive.
My cats are back about 14" or so, or at least that's about how much I had to splice in to my '02 sensor wires...
Personally, I couldn't feel much if anything really down low but in the mid and upper rpms it's very distinctive.
My cats are back about 14" or so, or at least that's about how much I had to splice in to my '02 sensor wires...
Trending Topics
#10
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Georgia/East Florida
Posts: 24,686
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes
on
19 Posts
Headers of any length provide gains over a stock manifold, both torque and HP. The thing you need to realize is that the engine doesn't need to work as hard to expel gases with headers since headers scavenge these gases instead of letting them sit and mixing in the manifold, thus forcing the engine to have to "push" these gases out into the exhaust system. Generally, the longer the tubes, the more vacuum is created to help scavenge these gases.
The "issue" here is since the engine doesn't have to "work" as hard at these very low end RPMs, there is a perceptible feeling of low end torque loss. The engine is actually running more efficiently. It's commonly said that better breathing equates to torque loss with HP gains, but in reality a dyno will show torque is actually increased - BUT the peak torque is moved up higher in the RPM band.
Since shorties do not scavenge as efficiently as long tubes (although certainly better than manifolds) the torque curve is not moved up into the RPM band as far as it is with long tubes. Of course there are other mods you can do with LT headers to increase torque down low (cam with a grind cut for more low end, less top end for example) which will give you the best of both worlds.
In my case, with the cats still in-tact, I don't feel any low end torque loss - but I can't say I see any gains either. However, there is no doubt the gains from say 2200 rpm and up are VERY feel-able after I went to long tube headers...
The "issue" here is since the engine doesn't have to "work" as hard at these very low end RPMs, there is a perceptible feeling of low end torque loss. The engine is actually running more efficiently. It's commonly said that better breathing equates to torque loss with HP gains, but in reality a dyno will show torque is actually increased - BUT the peak torque is moved up higher in the RPM band.
Since shorties do not scavenge as efficiently as long tubes (although certainly better than manifolds) the torque curve is not moved up into the RPM band as far as it is with long tubes. Of course there are other mods you can do with LT headers to increase torque down low (cam with a grind cut for more low end, less top end for example) which will give you the best of both worlds.
In my case, with the cats still in-tact, I don't feel any low end torque loss - but I can't say I see any gains either. However, there is no doubt the gains from say 2200 rpm and up are VERY feel-able after I went to long tube headers...