3rd Gen Ram Tech 2002-2008 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2002 through 2008 Rams Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

4.7 Throttle Body Spacer with 70MM TB

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 11, 2022 | 09:10 AM
  #11  
steve05ram360's Avatar
steve05ram360
Thread Starter
|
Hall Of Fame
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12,946
Likes: 309
Default

Originally Posted by Magnoom
That it's easier to just get the nitrous plate already setup.
Whats the typical thickness of a nitrous plate?
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2022 | 09:17 AM
  #12  
steve05ram360's Avatar
steve05ram360
Thread Starter
|
Hall Of Fame
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12,946
Likes: 309
Default

Just had a look, those are pretty pricey. Some of the designs would cause a restriction.

My thinking is to extend the TB out to allow the flow to become more laminar as it enters the intake. The TBS would do that however it would also cause a restriction and would need to be cut down to match the output of the 70MM TB.

 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2022 | 09:34 AM
  #13  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,483
Likes: 4,223
From: Clayton MI
Default

What size is the opening into the intake manifold? You don't want a 'step' there, as that would make for some turbulent airflow...... which seems to be what you are trying to avoid.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2022 | 09:46 AM
  #14  
steve05ram360's Avatar
steve05ram360
Thread Starter
|
Hall Of Fame
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12,946
Likes: 309
Default

Not sure, just getting the wheels turning on ideas on this... not sure if I will ever do anything on it with the project list as full as it is. It would be off quite a bit in the future if I dove into it. To many lower hanging fruits to leverage 1st.
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2022 | 12:17 PM
  #15  
Magnoom's Avatar
Magnoom
Record Breaker
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Coast Guard
5 Year Member
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 262
Default

Forget screwing around with a spacer. Find an early 00's 4.7HO manifold (harder to find) or the 08+ intake manifold (easier to find but requires a TB adapter since the 08+ was FBW) and bolt that on. Automatically superior to your stock manifold.
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2022 | 01:35 PM
  #16  
steve05ram360's Avatar
steve05ram360
Thread Starter
|
Hall Of Fame
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12,946
Likes: 309
Default

Originally Posted by Magnoom
Forget screwing around with a spacer. Find an early 00's 4.7HO manifold (harder to find) or the 08+ intake manifold (easier to find but requires a TB adapter since the 08+ was FBW) and bolt that on. Automatically superior to your stock manifold.
I dont learn anything by not experimenting... you dont know what you dont know until you figure it out. Remember, would not be using it as shipped, would be extending the throttle body out an inch and adding volume to the IM.

The 08+ manifold and most likely the HO manifold may not work for my objectives. The shorter runners moves the power up the RPM range, I want it lower. I am after peak torque down around 1800~2000 rpms.
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2022 | 02:21 PM
  #17  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,483
Likes: 4,223
From: Clayton MI
Default

Originally Posted by steve05ram360
I dont learn anything by not experimenting... you dont know what you dont know until you figure it out. Remember, would not be using it as shipped, would be extending the throttle body out an inch and adding volume to the IM.

The 08+ manifold and most likely the HO manifold may not work for my objectives. The shorter runners moves the power up the RPM range, I want it lower. I am after peak torque down around 1800~2000 rpms.
But we already know that tb spacers don't do squat. You can play with it, but, pretty sure it's just a waste of time.
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2022 | 02:49 PM
  #18  
Magnoom's Avatar
Magnoom
Record Breaker
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Coast Guard
5 Year Member
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 262
Default

1. You aren't going to achieve that goal with an extra long TB neck (which is what you're doing).
2. You aren't going to achieve that goal with that particular engine without more extensive changes because it isn't designed that way. You want peak torque that much lower on a 4.7? You need custom cams and the needed PCM recalibration to go with them. That whole engine family (the 3.7 and all variations of the 4.7) has always been that way.
3. You want peak torque that low with the same approximate power? Swap in a 4.0L Jeep I6.
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2022 | 03:32 PM
  #19  
steve05ram360's Avatar
steve05ram360
Thread Starter
|
Hall Of Fame
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12,946
Likes: 309
Default

Originally Posted by HeyYou
But we already know that tb spacers don't do squat. You can play with it, but, pretty sure it's just a waste of time.
So your saying a TBS does not change anything in the way a motor performs? There are the same commenters on the intake horn on the cummins motor. The IH does nothing for performance... my 1st hand experience tells me otherwise relating to the stock IH & the ATS Arcflo.

Originally Posted by Magnoom
1. You aren't going to achieve that goal with an extra long TB neck (which is what you're doing).
2. You aren't going to achieve that goal with that particular engine without more extensive changes because it isn't designed that way. You want peak torque that much lower on a 4.7? You need custom cams and the needed PCM recalibration to go with them. That whole engine family (the 3.7 and all variations of the 4.7) has always been that way.
3. You want peak torque that low with the same approximate power? Swap in a 4.0L Jeep I6.
What will an extra long TB neck to do performance? I have not found anything on the web that shows me what would happen to lengthening the area behind the TB. I did find info that tells me what happens in front of the TB though, but not behind.

The HO manifold vs the '99-'03 (?) manifold... what did they do to make it an "HO" manifold, shorten the runner length which moved the power up the rpm range...


https://dodgeforum.com/forum/3rd-gen...ml#post2812024

The 2008 4.7L intake has 350mm long intake runners and it will make the most HP of any 4.7L intake manifold. The 2008 4.7L cams are also good for over 305 SAE corrected flywheel HP.
The 2011 design is the new replacement intake for all 2008 & UP 4.7L engines. It appears to be very close in design to the 2008 intake with just a few subtle differences. The overall size of the two intakes appears to be the same although the 2011 appears to have smoother transitions with the absence of plugged holes left from manufacturing. They both share the same vacuume ports and EGR ports in the same location... all in all the 2011 appears to be an improvment in design over the 2008 intake. We cant say if there is a HP gain or not quite yet.
The original HO lost core design flows more air and makes more power than the later common shell mold design, even though they both have 415mm intake runner lengths.
Original 4.7L SO intake has 510mm (20.0787 inches) intake runners and is a lost core design.
Original 4.7L HO intake has 415mm (16.3386 inches) intake runners and is a lost core design.
Common 4.7L SO/HO intake has 415mm (16.3386 inches) intake runners and is a shell mold design.
2008 4.7L intake has 350mm (13.7795 inches) intake runners and I'm unsure of the exact design.

The shorter the intake runners the stronger the top end HP. The HO intake manifold with it's 415mm long runners falls on it's face above 5200 RPM.
The 2008 4.7L intake manifold with it's 350mm long runners will pull strong to 5600-5800 RPM (not exactly sure of the final rev limiter.)
That post indicates that they shortened the runners as the years went on, then a lot of folks jumped on the band wagon and swapped over to the shorter runner manifolds. Most of those from what I have read are looking for top end power.

This mod... https://www.cumminsforum.com/threads...od-v3.2550392/ one of my favorites... I didnt wake up one day and decide to do this, first was the CAI and the loss of approx 1 mpg that came with it. Then came the return to the stock air box and the return of the 1 mpg lost. Then came the V1 version with an $8 vent on the bottom of the air box. Open gave the benefit of the CAI (with the drop in mpg because of the tq peak moving higher up in the rpms... enough to see the mpg drop)... Closed gave me the current mpg's. Then came V2 at a cost of close to $300, where I put an electric exhaust cutout on it... I get the best of both worlds at the flip of a switch. Finally came V3 at a cost of about $100 because I used parts from V2, automatic control over the boost controlled cut out. The best of both worlds on the fly, every throttle event every day. It did increase mpg's but it was also combined with another mod (i forget which one) so it was hard to say which did what. V3 of the air box mod... one of my favorites.

The point is, just because a lot of people say one thing, does not mean it will apply in all cases. You can continue to stay inside the box and go with the herd but I prefer to stay outside the box and learn what I can.

Thanks to both of you for motivating me... I will go spend the $ and learn what I can from it, I will see 1st hand how it can be used.
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2022 | 04:32 PM
  #20  
Magnoom's Avatar
Magnoom
Record Breaker
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Coast Guard
5 Year Member
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 262
Default

Originally Posted by steve05ram360
You can continue to stay inside the box and go with the herd but I prefer to stay outside the box and learn what I can.
LMAO....yes that's all very nice. What you are failing to realize is that there is a reason (probably several) both the factory and aftermarket basically ignored this engine beyond anything stock. You have fun, bubba. I'm sure you'll show us 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣��🤣
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:21 AM.