2009 Ram Hemi Superchips Tuning Released
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Just ordered mine as well, paid 390 total with tax/shipping.
2010 support will be next, still working the TM for the 09.
It should still be the same model numbers for the 2010, so you could get one now and once the tune comes out, all you have to do is DL it and plug and play.
2010 support will be next, still working the TM for the 09.
It should still be the same model numbers for the 2010, so you could get one now and once the tune comes out, all you have to do is DL it and plug and play.
Thread Starter
|
All Star
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
From: GA
2010 support is next. No ETA.
Next the 09 beta testers will be testing shift schedule and torque management adjustments. Once that's ironed out, it will be released.
I'm running the expanded trans options now as a beta tester and it transforms the truck into a beast.
Sil
Next the 09 beta testers will be testing shift schedule and torque management adjustments. Once that's ironed out, it will be released.
I'm running the expanded trans options now as a beta tester and it transforms the truck into a beast.
Sil
Admin formally known as 94rt10ohio
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 9,025
Likes: 3
From: Curtice, OH
Someone needs to post a real street experience. My money is on M15 to come through first.
My Diablo sold in 2 hours on EBay @ $245.
Diablo review....
Fuel saver light no longer correct
93 tune was very NICE! But issues with downshift when cold air temps existed.
87 tune = PING when under moderate to hard accerleration and coming out of MDS with moderate to heavy acceleration.
MPG was about .8 MPG difference. This is as honest a number as I could give. I knew it was in the mail, ran a FULL tank down to about 1 gallon with stock tune driving easy. Put on 93 tune, filled up and drove the same with the exception on one WOT and ended up .8 different. Of course air temp, ect can affect, so take it for what it is worth.
Support poor IMHO.
No 91 tune.
Confusing product to an extent. Unless you know before hand or have a reseller who cares you WILL end up with a tuner and no way to attach to your PC to download updates unless you buy the optional comm kit.
Superchips is on my list in 3 weeks, waiting on the real world review. I will of course post my experience as well, good or bad. The SC I had on a 02 TransAm was great.
My Diablo sold in 2 hours on EBay @ $245.
Diablo review....
Fuel saver light no longer correct
93 tune was very NICE! But issues with downshift when cold air temps existed.
87 tune = PING when under moderate to hard accerleration and coming out of MDS with moderate to heavy acceleration.
MPG was about .8 MPG difference. This is as honest a number as I could give. I knew it was in the mail, ran a FULL tank down to about 1 gallon with stock tune driving easy. Put on 93 tune, filled up and drove the same with the exception on one WOT and ended up .8 different. Of course air temp, ect can affect, so take it for what it is worth.
Support poor IMHO.
No 91 tune.
Confusing product to an extent. Unless you know before hand or have a reseller who cares you WILL end up with a tuner and no way to attach to your PC to download updates unless you buy the optional comm kit.
Superchips is on my list in 3 weeks, waiting on the real world review. I will of course post my experience as well, good or bad. The SC I had on a 02 TransAm was great.
Last edited by CarGuyOhio; Feb 21, 2010 at 02:26 PM.
