7.5 mpg, all I can expect??
Maybe the brakes are dragging? Do you drive with both feet? How about the parking brake, could it be hanging up somehow?
It seems to me that if the truck was getting that bad of mileage, that there would be a noticeable lack in performance of some kind.
It seems to me that if the truck was getting that bad of mileage, that there would be a noticeable lack in performance of some kind.
As you will find out someday, checking/changing the plugs is not something that you can do in 10 minutes like on most vehicles.
Yeah, I dunno where they pulled that window sticker out of, but the best MPG configuration of any 2010 is a base, regular cab ST V6 4x2 which is rated for 20/14.
But regardless, 7.5 mpg is horrid and would tell me either A) your city driving is about all stop and go, B) your driving habits are terrible, or C) there is an issue with your truck.
I have my NON MDS Hemi 4x4 weighing almost 7000 lbs., am rolling on 35" tires and can at least average 10 mpg in the middle of Orlando. 15/12 is about the norm for me.
But regardless, 7.5 mpg is horrid and would tell me either A) your city driving is about all stop and go, B) your driving habits are terrible, or C) there is an issue with your truck.
I have my NON MDS Hemi 4x4 weighing almost 7000 lbs., am rolling on 35" tires and can at least average 10 mpg in the middle of Orlando. 15/12 is about the norm for me.
Why they would put the 3.7L V6 in the Ram much less anyone actually buy one is beyond me. The Hemi is rated at the same MPG and the 4.7 is only 1 mpg less. Maybe there is something here I just don't get? I mean to me, the ONLY advantage of a smaller engine would be fuel economy, that just isn't the case in the Ram.
I'm not trying to insult anyone with a V6 Ram here, but I just don't get the logic. Although with my reasoning, I guess the same would hold true about a 4.7 V8...
I'm not trying to insult anyone with a V6 Ram here, but I just don't get the logic. Although with my reasoning, I guess the same would hold true about a 4.7 V8...
Why they would put the 3.7L V6 in the Ram much less anyone actually buy one is beyond me. The Hemi is rated at the same MPG and the 4.7 is only 1 mpg less. Maybe there is something here I just don't get? I mean to me, the ONLY advantage of a smaller engine would be fuel economy, that just isn't the case in the Ram.
I'm not trying to insult anyone with a V6 Ram here, but I just don't get the logic. Although with my reasoning, I guess the same would hold true about a 4.7 V8...
I'm not trying to insult anyone with a V6 Ram here, but I just don't get the logic. Although with my reasoning, I guess the same would hold true about a 4.7 V8...
BTW, I dunno if it's changed because mine is an '04, but I am a pack rat and still have my window sticker (I have always folded them and stuck them in the owners manual packet with every new vehicle I ever purchased). The option line lists the 5.7 Hemi EFI engine at $795. Although I know in the used truck market around here, it does usually command about $1500-2000 over a 4.7 of the same year and type...
I wonder if the jump in price came with MDS in '06 or with the 4th Gen an it's increase in HP? Out of curiosity, I may have to check into it.
Without having to go outside, get my window sticker and scan it this is from a review of the '04 Ram I just Googled:
The Hemi produces 345 horsepower and 375 foot-pounds of torque. When properly equipped, that increases the towing capacity to 9200 pounds and payload by an additional 500 pounds. The 5.7-liter Hemi adds $795 to the price.
Without having to go outside, get my window sticker and scan it this is from a review of the '04 Ram I just Googled:
The Hemi produces 345 horsepower and 375 foot-pounds of torque. When properly equipped, that increases the towing capacity to 9200 pounds and payload by an additional 500 pounds. The 5.7-liter Hemi adds $795 to the price.



