4th Gen Ram Tech 2009 - 2018 Rams and the 2019 Ram Classic: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2009 - 2018 Rams and the 2019 Ram Classic. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

whos pulling a fifth wheel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 12, 2013 | 11:51 AM
  #41  
Nate769's Avatar
Nate769
All Star
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 824
Likes: 1
From: Alberta
Default

Originally Posted by scatpack_69
Wait. What!?

Please, what stats does the 6.7 Cummins have that are "AMAZING" and better than the Duramax?? You mean, the lower power?

And a tuner on a stock setting waking it up? (*shakes head*)

The Duramax (current LML) is rated at 397hp/756trq. Current Cummins 6.7 is 350hp/800trq. That extra horsepower combined with the V8 architecture will walk the Cummins every day of the week, empty or loaded. The Ram will get its a$$ handed to it. Everyone knows that. That 397hp/756trq will also walk the 400hp/800trq 6.7 Powerstroke, all day every day. The Duramax is a running SOB.

It also gets better mileage than the 6.7 Cummins does and has a better transmission backing it.
I didn't want a can of worms here...but I guess I got it...

IF you look at the "stats" the cummins puts out numbers at much lower values then the duramax. Which I am sure you already know is better. As far as the new powerstroke, it is much more comparable to the cummins, and kicks the duramax butt in stats. If you don't already know this either, 200rpm in a diesel means a world of difference vs a gas.

BUT AGAIN! I don't look at those stats. You take all three trucks, STOCK 2012 models. Pull the same trailer up the same road. The duramax pulls the best hands down. Best pulling power/engine response times, with reasonable economy. Fords got the mileage part beaten, but that motor lags worse then the cummins. Cummins is laggy all the way, although has the best exhaust brake (for what its worth) with again reasonable mileage.

What I meant with the tuner part. Take and put the tuner and just run it on stock setting for comparison between tuner stock and STOCK. The tuner is gonna get rid of all that computer crap that lags that motor down. When I hit the pedal I want it to go! Not decide on how much power/turbo its gonna cut off at. Yes of course your gonna see the same type of thing with the other motors, but the cummins gets the best responses. (By word from H&S forums) I can also say from experience that its a whole truck. If I kept the truck and could not tune it, id have traded it off in a week and gone back the Hemi, cause it pulled better than that. Oh and I am not talking tuning up 3 levels and seeing HP increases here.

Also look at the mileage stats givin off by automakers. They are ALL out to lunch I don't care what you say...The ecoboost? 32MPG? Good luck, I know a few guys who couldn't hit 22! On a good day! They also advertise the new Hemi here in Canada at 36MPG! There is no way you will ever reach that!

All those numbers are advertising numbers, the bigger the more interest your gonna get...

All I am trying to say is stats mean nothing until you can actually put that motor in the truck...Now we are just starting to see what the reliability of these new motors are, but in all reality its still too early to tell whos gonna win there. But with the older models you can learn that from EXPERIENCE.
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2013 | 02:38 PM
  #42  
scatpack_69's Avatar
scatpack_69
All Star
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
From: Wyoming
Default

Originally Posted by Deadsquiggles
Actually, the Cummins is a better motor, especially for towing. It's an inline 6 so it's in balance with itself. It doesn't need a special crankshaft for it to be balanced. And, they have higher torque at lower RPMs, all thanks to the mechanics of the inline 6. And out of the three diesels in production, (Powerstroke, Cummins, and Duramax), the Cummins gets the best gas mileage.
You're still wrong. The Duramax and 6.7 Powerstroke make peak torque at the EXACT same rpm as the Cummins does, 1600rpm. And that's a fact. There goes your "the inline makes more torque down low" argument.

The Cummins makes 350hp at 3,000rpm, the 6.7 Powerstroke makes 400hp at 2,800rpm, the Duramax makes 397hp at 3,000rpm. The Cummins also gets the worst mileage out of the three, another fact. It lacks SCR, which the other two use, and dumps far more gasses back through the intake via EGR and has to regen more than the other two. More regens equals more fuel burnt.

Go drive them, all three. I guarantee you the Duramax will be the quicker, the Powerstroke will be second, and the Cummins last. The "feel" will be different, but the V8's will outpull and outhaul the Cummins every day of the week.

NVH, ever heard of it? The Cummins shakes a hell of a lot more than the V8's do.


Originally Posted by Deadsquiggles
And the Powerstroke will walk the Duramax any day of the week.
No it won't.

Originally Posted by Deadsquiggles
And just food for thought, the new Ram 3500 with a Cummins has a tow rating of 30,000lbs. The new Chevy 3500 with a Duramax does not.
New, as-in not even released yet. I'm talking what's on the roads NOW. Give it a couple months and Ford will undoubtedly magically release larger numbers...

Originally Posted by Nate769
IF you look at the "stats" the cummins puts out numbers at much lower values then the duramax. Which I am sure you already know is better. As far as the new powerstroke, it is much more comparable to the cummins, and kicks the duramax butt in stats. If you don't already know this either, 200rpm in a diesel means a world of difference vs a gas.
See above^^

Originally Posted by Nate769
BUT AGAIN! I don't look at those stats. You take all three trucks, STOCK 2012 models. Pull the same trailer up the same road. The duramax pulls the best hands down. Best pulling power/engine response times, with reasonable economy. Fords got the mileage part beaten, but that motor lags worse then the cummins. Cummins is laggy all the way, although has the best exhaust brake (for what its worth) with again reasonable mileage.
Agreed

Originally Posted by Nate769
What I meant with the tuner part. Take and put the tuner and just run it on stock setting for comparison between tuner stock and STOCK. The tuner is gonna get rid of all that computer crap that lags that motor down. When I hit the pedal I want it to go! Not decide on how much power/turbo its gonna cut off at. Yes of course your gonna see the same type of thing with the other motors, but the cummins gets the best responses. (By word from H&S forums) I can also say from experience that its a whole truck. If I kept the truck and could not tune it, id have traded it off in a week and gone back the Hemi, cause it pulled better than that. Oh and I am not talking tuning up 3 levels and seeing HP increases here.
It depends on your programmer. If I take Smarty and set it to stock, it's stock. If I remove my EFILive and put a stock file in, it's stock. Edge does adjust timing some over stock, but I don't think it's drastically different. I don't know what H&S does on stock. Are you deleted?

I fully agree on the mileage numbers, it's all BS. EPA mileage numbers are in near-perfect conditions inside a lab, not in the real world.



Not trying to argue, but the old school thinking is gone nowadays. I'm not new to the diesel game, I'm not ignorant, there is an underlying reason I have a Dodge diesel (I much prefer the Dodge pickup itself, and the Cummins is in my opinion the best engine out there) but the V8's are right there with it, and that Duramax is on par with the Cummins in being the best engine out there. One hell of an engine in a crap wrapper
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2013 | 06:58 PM
  #43  
cyclone429's Avatar
cyclone429
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 2
From: Alberta
Default

*A 3500 2013 Ram will never tow 30,000 pounds, the 450 to 650 versions of the HD ram are the trucks with thease stats.
 

Last edited by cyclone429; Jan 12, 2013 at 07:01 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2013 | 07:30 PM
  #44  
scatpack_69's Avatar
scatpack_69
All Star
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
From: Wyoming
Default

Originally Posted by cyclone429
*A 3500 2013 Ram will never tow 30,000 pounds, the 450 to 650 versions of the HD ram are the trucks with thease stats.
Incorrect.

Do people actually do ANY research before typing??

I could go hook up to 30k with my 07 right now and pull it, no problem. It's been done for years.

The new 2013 is indeed rated at max 30k lb towing. The chassis cab trucks (there is NO 650/6500 Ram BTW) have higher payload ratings
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2013 | 07:39 PM
  #45  
dlyter09's Avatar
dlyter09
Champion
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg,PA
Default

I research alot of things that get me curious... Others dont... It is pointless in arguing with people who just think they know...

http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2013/01...30000-lbs.html
 
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2013 | 03:57 PM
  #46  
cyclone429's Avatar
cyclone429
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 2
From: Alberta
Default

Originally Posted by scatpack_69
Incorrect.

Do people actually do ANY research before typing??

I could go hook up to 30k with my 07 right now and pull it, no problem. It's been done for years.

The new 2013 is indeed rated at max 30k lb towing. The chassis cab trucks (there is NO 650/6500 Ram BTW) have higher payload ratings
I will read up again on the articals posted here, I may have got the pay load and tow rattings confused, and Im sure dodge chassis cabs are made above the 3500 frame but thier wearing the stearling name plate on a dodge body.

Okay, the artical posted above and on the datta sheet at the verry bottom, a 6speed automatic with a 410 in a ctd 3500 will pull 30,000 lbs, I stand Corrected!!!
 

Last edited by cyclone429; Jan 13, 2013 at 04:04 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2013 | 04:09 PM
  #47  
RSDodgelover's Avatar
RSDodgelover
Professional
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 245
Likes: 1
From: Pennsylvania
Default

The main thing to remember with these maximum tow capacities is they are with properly balanced loads on properly maintained equipment with good to excellent brakes, tires etc under normal weather conditions. There is very little room for error or oversights in these numbers. Everyone be safe .
 
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2013 | 06:07 PM
  #48  
dlyter09's Avatar
dlyter09
Champion
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg,PA
Default

Originally Posted by RSDodgelover
The main thing to remember with these maximum tow capacities is they are with properly balanced loads on properly maintained equipment with good to excellent brakes, tires etc under normal weather conditions. There is very little room for error or oversights in these numbers. Everyone be safe .
Agreed.. The GCVW of the new 3500's is somewhere around 38k... You wanna haul that you need a CDL or farm tags.. And if you have that and throw 30k on a trailer that leaves you no room for any extra....
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2013 | 12:39 PM
  #49  
aofarrell2's Avatar
aofarrell2
Champion
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,096
Likes: 2
From: Iowa
Default

Originally Posted by hounddogg
I can't stop laughing. Dodge 360. Gutless gas hog. LOL. you so funny.
Sorry man but a Ford V8 sucks more gas outta your pocket than a Dodge V8.
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2013 | 12:48 PM
  #50  
hounddogg's Avatar
hounddogg
Record Breaker
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 0
From: Ila Georgia
Default

Ford V8s do for the most part. I agree. I have had three Mercury Marquis and I like the 4.6 in that application. The RV owners like the Ford V10
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:06 PM.