2006 Dodge Charger Gets Hate Mail:
#1
12-01-2004, 03:38 PM
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2006 Dodge Charger Gets Hate Mail:
2006 Dodge Charger:
1969 Dodge Charger:
Chrysler fends off a Charger coup:
The Chrysler group's revival of the Charger name on a Dodge sedan is generating "hate mail," says a senior executive. Production of the 2006 model starts in January, but correspondence is voluminous opposing the name on a four-door, says Trevor Creed, Chrysler senior vice president of design. The naysayers, writing primarily via e-mail, champion various Charger coupes that ran from 1966 through 1978 and from 1982 through 1987, Creed says. "They all think their Charger is the real thing."
Autoweek.com
redriderbob
#2
12-01-2004, 03:40 PM
Record Breaker
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: southern NH
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#4
12-01-2004, 04:17 PM
Record Breaker
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: southern NH
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2006 Dodge Charger Gets Hate Mail:
If the Charger had remained all along, it probably would have changed a lot. Ma Mopar did away with ALL rear drive cars in.... what was it... 1990? The Charger took a big departure from its roots in '75 when it became a Cordoba knock-off, and got even worse in '82 when it became a striped front-drive Omnirizon. On the other hand, looking at something from one of those OTHER companies... ie, Mustang, Corvette, etc.... they too strayed from their roots, not quite as far, but have remained a lot closer to their original concepts than this new 'Charger'. IMHO, they should have left the name dead and buried until they came up with a car closer to what the Charger was originally intended to be in '66. This 2006 version is a 300C in Dodge clothing.... not a bad car by any means, but NOT a Charger!
#5
12-01-2004, 07:07 PM
The Only Elite DF Member
#6
12-01-2004, 07:17 PM
Lady Administrator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Shelby Twp, Michigan
Posts: 13,114
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
RE: 2006 Dodge Charger Gets Hate Mail:
ORIGINAL: TeeWJay426
If the Charger had remained all along, it probably would have changed a lot. Ma Mopar did away with ALL rear drive cars in.... what was it... 1990? The Charger took a big departure from its roots in '75 when it became a Cordoba knock-off, and got even worse in '82 when it became a striped front-drive Omnirizon. On the other hand, looking at something from one of those OTHER companies... ie, Mustang, Corvette, etc.... they too strayed from their roots, not quite as far, but have remained a lot closer to their original concepts than this new 'Charger'. IMHO, they should have left the name dead and buried until they came up with a car closer to what the Charger was originally intended to be in '66. This 2006 version is a 300C in Dodge clothing.... not a bad car by any means, but NOT a Charger!
If the Charger had remained all along, it probably would have changed a lot. Ma Mopar did away with ALL rear drive cars in.... what was it... 1990? The Charger took a big departure from its roots in '75 when it became a Cordoba knock-off, and got even worse in '82 when it became a striped front-drive Omnirizon. On the other hand, looking at something from one of those OTHER companies... ie, Mustang, Corvette, etc.... they too strayed from their roots, not quite as far, but have remained a lot closer to their original concepts than this new 'Charger'. IMHO, they should have left the name dead and buried until they came up with a car closer to what the Charger was originally intended to be in '66. This 2006 version is a 300C in Dodge clothing.... not a bad car by any means, but NOT a Charger!
~Amanda
#7
12-01-2004, 07:43 PM
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2006 Dodge Charger Gets Hate Mail:
The new 2006 Dodge Charger's name doesn't bother me. But if I had it my way at Chrysler Group, this car would not be called the Charger, but instead the Dodge Coronet! I would save the Charger name for a two door coupe version, w/ more detail to the of the Chargers of the late 60's and early 70's. But the name Dodge Charger, just sounds right together. Just like the remake of the Dodge Magnum name... Dodge and Magnum just sound good for one another... now just build me a 2-door Coupe GTO/Mustang killer called the Dodge Challenger and we got ourself the best three cars on the planet!
redriderbob
redriderbob
Trending Topics
#8
12-01-2004, 07:58 PM
Record Breaker
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: southern NH
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2006 Dodge Charger Gets Hate Mail:
I don't object to Dodge reusing the Charger name. I object to the car they have chosen to put it on. Calling it the Coronet would have been a better choice.
On this point we agree. I don't object to the reuse of the Magnum name, either. The name 'Charger' just carries a lot more signifance, historically and image-wise, for Dodge..... such that they should have been a whole lot more selective on the car they chose to put it on.
I would save the Charger name for a two door coupe version, w/ more detail to the of the Chargers of the late 60's and early 70's.
#9
12-01-2004, 09:47 PM
RE: 2006 Dodge Charger Gets Hate Mail:
its crap..and thats that..i dont care if it runs 10, stock. much like i dont care if the SRTs can run low 13s/high 12s stock. they need to make a damn coupe other than the piece of mistu crap im stuck with. as a mopar driver, everywhere i go i have to listen to five-blow and cumaro drivers go on and on about how dodge doesnt make a "muscle car"...aside from the rich mans toy that is the viper..my only comeback is the SRT4...a 4 door neon...the neon part is fine but dodges proliferation of the 4 door disgusts me.
#10
12-01-2004, 10:01 PM
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 12,484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts