2000 gc 3.3 mpgs
hey the idea of replies to problems it to be so completely off base that no-one has a clue how to solve the problem posted by the OP. Like getting totally off track on a non-relevant issue.
Oh and if you stack up various issues, you sure can get to a 50% loss of fuel economy.
Oh and if you stack up various issues, you sure can get to a 50% loss of fuel economy.
Hey whadya know. You two are in agreement, yet you're bickering. Both said the same thing but you used used mathematics and he used a visualization. Same point, different route to get there. Variety really is the spice of life.
hey the idea of replies to problems it to be so completely off base that no-one has a clue how to solve the problem posted by the OP. Like getting totally off track on a non-relevant issue.
Oh and if you stack up various issues, you sure can get to a 50% loss of fuel economy.
Oh and if you stack up various issues, you sure can get to a 50% loss of fuel economy.
So the guy's engine runs fine in the first post. So explain why would he have a 50% reduction of fuel mileage!!!!!!!!!!!!!! without a driveability issue!!!!!
You guys already smashed the $hit out of me for suggesting brake drag!!!
You guys already smashed the $hit out of me for suggesting brake drag!!!
Last edited by 22DODGE22; Mar 26, 2011 at 12:43 AM.
Do you honestly believe that you could experience a 50 percent drop in mileage without a hint of a problem?
I personally don't!
Perhaps he is one of the clueless people you so kindly described in your earlier post and doesn't know how to calculate gas mileage.
It wouldn't pass an inspection or emission test.
I personally don't!
Perhaps he is one of the clueless people you so kindly described in your earlier post and doesn't know how to calculate gas mileage.
It wouldn't pass an inspection or emission test.
Last edited by wtribeflyer; Mar 26, 2011 at 12:47 AM.
BTW. I have never heard of any synthetic oils causing sludge in an engine. Quite the contrary actually



