Neon SRT-4 Dodge Neon SRT-4 is the pocket rocket that took the import scene and turned it upside down.

2005 srt-4 vs new mitsubishi eclipse

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 7, 2005 | 11:59 PM
  #31  
71RoadRunner's Avatar
71RoadRunner
Legend
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,543
Likes: 2
From: United States
Default RE: 2005 srt-4 vs new mitsubishi eclipse

ORIGINAL: Tonka25

This whole thing started cus you were all bashing the new eclipse. (stating your opinion) So i wrote to state mine. You all got so bent out of shape about it made me laugh harder than when i read that you all thought the neon was a great looking car and the eclipse was butt ugly. Your all rediculous and take life way to seriouly. Lighten up a little bit. I agreed that the eclipse is ugly. But also stated that the neon isnt that great either. You jumped all over me for what i think. I really dont care what people think about or say about me or my car. I still love it. I own a 91 Supra turbo. Modded to the point of insanity. I love it but a lot of people find them to be ugly. Am i going to pick a fight with everyone who thinks my car is ugly....NO. And since most of the population thinks the Neon is ugly you really cant fight everyone now can you ? ? If you like your car great ! but dont get pissed at people who dont. And getting pissed off at someone who stated there opinion the same way you were is also rediculous. How is it ok for you to bash the eclipse but no one can bash the srt-4 ? ? If you cant play fair dont play at all
This is a Dodge Forum and not an Eclipse forum, there would be a problem if we were on an Eclipse forum saying how we don't like it and that it's ugly since that would then most likely be considered flaming, but this being a Dodge Forum means it isn't. Saying bad things about a Dodge here would be considered flaming, but there are exceptions. It all comes down to how it is written/said. The way you worded your first post in this thread is a flamatory remark about what we happen to like. What you did and continue to do is no different than us going into a Supra forum and saying their Supra's are laughable fugly slow grocery getters, everyone there would get pissed and start attacking back, you would more than likely be one of them too. You and your like minded friends are not everyone and there are just as many that like the Neons as there are ones that don't. There are some Neons that I think look really good and others that I don't like, but the SRT-4 and some other Neons with the right body kit look great. Stating your opinion is one thing, taking it past that as you did is entirely another when you know just about everyone here has a differing view point. I've been to the track many times and I have yet to hear or see anyone pointing and snickering at any SRT-4.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2005 | 02:29 AM
  #32  
Midnight SRT's Avatar
Midnight SRT
Nightly Creeper
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 29,504
Likes: 6
From: Tallahassee, Florida
Default RE: 2005 srt-4 vs new mitsubishi eclipse

I'm glad to see everyone made good points and didn't get upset, unlike this troll is...
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2005 | 09:02 PM
  #33  
wozman78's Avatar
wozman78
Rookie
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 2005 srt-4 vs new mitsubishi eclipse

I personally think that my SRT and the new eclipse look good.But i never see the cars stock in my head,I always try and picture what they "could" look like.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2005 | 10:08 PM
  #34  
srt4 kid's Avatar
srt4 kid
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 2005 srt-4 vs new mitsubishi eclipse

Dang this discussion has gotten heated! I didn't mean for it to turn into an srt-4 vs mitsubishi eclipse death match. O well. [&:]
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2005 | 04:11 PM
  #35  
roachnigga's Avatar
roachnigga
Record Breaker
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,357
Likes: 0
From: KY/TN Area. Still NYC iz home!
Default RE: 2005 srt-4 vs new mitsubishi eclipse

shame on you....
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2005 | 07:49 PM
  #36  
Barneydriver's Avatar
Barneydriver
Captain
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 2005 srt-4 vs new mitsubishi eclipse

I like the '91 supra- do you have pics? I saw your truck but the supra is much more interesting.
[sm=smiley24.gif]
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2005 | 07:52 PM
  #37  
Barneydriver's Avatar
Barneydriver
Captain
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 2005 srt-4 vs new mitsubishi eclipse


ORIGINAL: Tonka25
There is a reason the fans at the track snicker and point at you.
oh yeah, about that- i have yet to have someone talk sh_t about my car at the track- on the contrary, all the other import guys always want to check it out, look under the hood, whatever, so i'm not sure where your statistical sample is from.
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2005 | 07:01 AM
  #38  
MikeyLittle's Avatar
MikeyLittle
Professional
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 2005 srt-4 vs new mitsubishi eclipse

I just got my srt4 and before i did i test drove the eclipse. it is a car that feels like its towing a boat behind it, it's not overly fast from the get go and its got no room at all in it. for such a big car compared to an srt4 its got no room for anyone over 5'8 in the back seat. no doubt its a step up from the last eclipse but i see a srt4 beating it, its just alot of weight and not enough hp to get that thing goin in the beginning
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2005 | 05:59 PM
  #39  
PONY KILLER's Avatar
PONY KILLER
Rookie
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Default RE: 2005 srt-4 vs new mitsubishi eclipse

Cant we all just get along? Ha Ha. Anyway saw the Eclipse reviewed on Motor Week? few months ago. talked about improvments such as getting rid of the "Cheese grater" door panels, their words not mine. Yes it's heavy not really a tru performance car. they made a good observation, they have the Evo's that is their top dog, why wood they want to confuse the issue? I'm not saying it's right to not make the Eclipse faster but see it all over, marketing and branding. chevy never made a car faster than the Corvette, that was their top dog (sorry Camaro owners) like it or not.

Second thing, I'm not a gear head (not that smart), for the most part you can look at HP to weight and tell which car is faster. I know there are other factors, for example our cars have launch issues. FWD but more so traction issues with stock tires too much power stock or the wrong tires. I know drive train and many other things matter but none of them have ever added even 1 HP from the flywheel back they just minimize the loss. So unless some part of your system is badley designed it goes back to HP to weight. that should limit some of these disscusions! Also reasonable to compare SRT-4 to cars with 260-270 HP at fly wheel. Now look at Weight I think the rest all falls into place!
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2005 | 06:21 PM
  #40  
Mindgame's Avatar
Mindgame
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 2005 srt-4 vs new mitsubishi eclipse

This thread got way out of controll.

I think eclipses are one of the greatest stock looking cars, My opinion. I also think the srt4 came out and kicked some *** it looks so mean.
I am a fan of the 1st and 2nd geration eclipses. Well i like the talon bodys better but ill keep it on subject.

I have yet to see the new eclipse in person, and drive either the srt4 or the new eclipse.

BTW I would put my money on the srt4 over the NEW eclispe. Not much more hp from the eclipse and they are a little heavier. just my opinion.

 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:38 AM.