2005 srt-4 vs new mitsubishi eclipse
ORIGINAL: Tonka25
This whole thing started cus you were all bashing the new eclipse. (stating your opinion) So i wrote to state mine. You all got so bent out of shape about it made me laugh harder than when i read that you all thought the neon was a great looking car and the eclipse was butt ugly. Your all rediculous and take life way to seriouly. Lighten up a little bit. I agreed that the eclipse is ugly. But also stated that the neon isnt that great either. You jumped all over me for what i think. I really dont care what people think about or say about me or my car. I still love it. I own a 91 Supra turbo. Modded to the point of insanity. I love it but a lot of people find them to be ugly. Am i going to pick a fight with everyone who thinks my car is ugly....NO. And since most of the population thinks the Neon is ugly you really cant fight everyone now can you ? ? If you like your car great ! but dont get pissed at people who dont. And getting pissed off at someone who stated there opinion the same way you were is also rediculous. How is it ok for you to bash the eclipse but no one can bash the srt-4 ? ? If you cant play fair dont play at all
This whole thing started cus you were all bashing the new eclipse. (stating your opinion) So i wrote to state mine. You all got so bent out of shape about it made me laugh harder than when i read that you all thought the neon was a great looking car and the eclipse was butt ugly. Your all rediculous and take life way to seriouly. Lighten up a little bit. I agreed that the eclipse is ugly. But also stated that the neon isnt that great either. You jumped all over me for what i think. I really dont care what people think about or say about me or my car. I still love it. I own a 91 Supra turbo. Modded to the point of insanity. I love it but a lot of people find them to be ugly. Am i going to pick a fight with everyone who thinks my car is ugly....NO. And since most of the population thinks the Neon is ugly you really cant fight everyone now can you ? ? If you like your car great ! but dont get pissed at people who dont. And getting pissed off at someone who stated there opinion the same way you were is also rediculous. How is it ok for you to bash the eclipse but no one can bash the srt-4 ? ? If you cant play fair dont play at all
ORIGINAL: Tonka25
There is a reason the fans at the track snicker and point at you.
There is a reason the fans at the track snicker and point at you.
I just got my srt4 and before i did i test drove the eclipse. it is a car that feels like its towing a boat behind it, it's not overly fast from the get go and its got no room at all in it. for such a big car compared to an srt4 its got no room for anyone over 5'8 in the back seat. no doubt its a step up from the last eclipse but i see a srt4 beating it, its just alot of weight and not enough hp to get that thing goin in the beginning
Cant we all just get along? Ha Ha. Anyway saw the Eclipse reviewed on Motor Week? few months ago. talked about improvments such as getting rid of the "Cheese grater" door panels, their words not mine. Yes it's heavy not really a tru performance car. they made a good observation, they have the Evo's that is their top dog, why wood they want to confuse the issue? I'm not saying it's right to not make the Eclipse faster but see it all over, marketing and branding. chevy never made a car faster than the Corvette, that was their top dog (sorry Camaro owners) like it or not.
Second thing, I'm not a gear head (not that smart), for the most part you can look at HP to weight and tell which car is faster. I know there are other factors, for example our cars have launch issues. FWD but more so traction issues with stock tires too much power stock or the wrong tires. I know drive train and many other things matter but none of them have ever added even 1 HP from the flywheel back they just minimize the loss. So unless some part of your system is badley designed it goes back to HP to weight. that should limit some of these disscusions! Also reasonable to compare SRT-4 to cars with 260-270 HP at fly wheel. Now look at Weight I think the rest all falls into place!
Second thing, I'm not a gear head (not that smart), for the most part you can look at HP to weight and tell which car is faster. I know there are other factors, for example our cars have launch issues. FWD but more so traction issues with stock tires too much power stock or the wrong tires. I know drive train and many other things matter but none of them have ever added even 1 HP from the flywheel back they just minimize the loss. So unless some part of your system is badley designed it goes back to HP to weight. that should limit some of these disscusions! Also reasonable to compare SRT-4 to cars with 260-270 HP at fly wheel. Now look at Weight I think the rest all falls into place!
This thread got way out of controll.
I think eclipses are one of the greatest stock looking cars, My opinion. I also think the srt4 came out and kicked some *** it looks so mean.
I am a fan of the 1st and 2nd geration eclipses. Well i like the talon bodys better but ill keep it on subject.
I have yet to see the new eclipse in person, and drive either the srt4 or the new eclipse.
BTW I would put my money on the srt4 over the NEW eclispe. Not much more hp from the eclipse and they are a little heavier. just my opinion.
I think eclipses are one of the greatest stock looking cars, My opinion. I also think the srt4 came out and kicked some *** it looks so mean.
I am a fan of the 1st and 2nd geration eclipses. Well i like the talon bodys better but ill keep it on subject.
I have yet to see the new eclipse in person, and drive either the srt4 or the new eclipse.
BTW I would put my money on the srt4 over the NEW eclispe. Not much more hp from the eclipse and they are a little heavier. just my opinion.


