SRT-4 vs GTO vs 350Z vs Mustang vs S2000
#11
#12
#13
#15
#16
RE: SRT-4 vs GTO vs 350Z vs Mustang vs S2000
An SRT-4 running on 3 cylinders could beat a WRX. You must be thinking of a WRX STi, because a WRX is only good for 6.1 sec. 0-60 MPH and 14.52@92.86 MPH in the 1/4. However, the STi is good for 5.1 sec. 0-60 MPH and 13.35@102.58 MPH in the 1/4.[sm=smiley2.gif]
#17
#18
RE: SRT-4 vs GTO vs 350Z vs Mustang vs S2000
the mirada is nearing streetability, i just need to find out which PA tag will allow me to skirt the emmissioon laws. id like to get it to 12.50s, then plate it up.
when that happens, bring on the SRT4s
but seriously, if by some chance, my new job should find me a way to get the SRT i may jump on the chance.
when that happens, bring on the SRT4s
but seriously, if by some chance, my new job should find me a way to get the SRT i may jump on the chance.
#19
RE: SRT-4 vs GTO vs 350Z vs Mustang vs S2000
Well, WRX are said to be able to(tested by Car & Driver) go to 0-60 in 5.4 and 1/4 in 14.1@95, also tested by car and driver, the SRT-4, going 0-60 in 5.6 and 1/4 in 14.3. I have tested my buddies WRX and with two pass. and easy out of 1st and ran a 6.01 0-60 and a 14.7@92. So, I am quite sure the a WRX (with an average driver) could beat a SRT(as much as I like the SRT) atleast in the 1/4. Has anyone personally,both stock, beat a WRX on here with an SRT? The STi I know could blow the doors off one, but they're $33k. I really like the SRT but dont know how they could beat a comparable in weight car with more hp and AWD. Just my own opinion, I really DO love the SRT, I just know that the WRX is a quicker car(stock).
#20
RE: SRT-4 vs GTO vs 350Z vs Mustang vs S2000
I would just like to correct you on one thing, Cra and Driver did a test on a 2004 SRT-4 with 230 hp and got 0-60 in 5.3 and a 1/4 mile in 13.9, so the SRT-4 could probably beat the WRX, but not the STi by no means. Sorry I cant answer your question though, I wont be getting my license for another 2 years.